2014-10-08 21:20:51

by Beniamino Galvani

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: rn5t618: Convert to new style DT parsing

Use the simplified DT parsing method to remove some duplicated
code.

Since this is a MFD subdevice and its device object doesn't have an
associated DT node, the configuration instance used to register the
regulators has been changed to point to the parent device.

Signed-off-by: Beniamino Galvani <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c | 51 +++--------------------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c
index e58d79a..b85ceb8 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c
@@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ static struct regulator_ops rn5t618_reg_ops = {
#define REG(rid, ereg, emask, vreg, vmask, min, max, step) \
[RN5T618_##rid] = { \
.name = #rid, \
+ .of_match = of_match_ptr(#rid), \
+ .regulators_node = of_match_ptr("regulators"), \
.id = RN5T618_##rid, \
.type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, \
.owner = THIS_MODULE, \
@@ -60,60 +62,15 @@ static struct regulator_desc rn5t618_regulators[] = {
REG(LDORTC2, LDOEN2, BIT(5), LDORTC2DAC, 0x7f, 900000, 3500000, 25000),
};

-static struct of_regulator_match rn5t618_matches[] = {
- [RN5T618_DCDC1] = { .name = "DCDC1" },
- [RN5T618_DCDC2] = { .name = "DCDC2" },
- [RN5T618_DCDC3] = { .name = "DCDC3" },
- [RN5T618_LDO1] = { .name = "LDO1" },
- [RN5T618_LDO2] = { .name = "LDO2" },
- [RN5T618_LDO3] = { .name = "LDO3" },
- [RN5T618_LDO4] = { .name = "LDO4" },
- [RN5T618_LDO5] = { .name = "LDO5" },
- [RN5T618_LDORTC1] = { .name = "LDORTC1" },
- [RN5T618_LDORTC2] = { .name = "LDORTC2" },
-};
-
-static int rn5t618_regulator_parse_dt(struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- struct device_node *np, *regulators;
- int ret;
-
- np = of_node_get(pdev->dev.parent->of_node);
- if (!np)
- return 0;
-
- regulators = of_get_child_by_name(np, "regulators");
- if (!regulators) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "regulators node not found\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
-
- ret = of_regulator_match(&pdev->dev, regulators, rn5t618_matches,
- ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_matches));
- of_node_put(regulators);
- if (ret < 0) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error parsing regulator init data: %d\n",
- ret);
- }
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static int rn5t618_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct rn5t618 *rn5t618 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
struct regulator_config config = { };
struct regulator_dev *rdev;
- int ret, i;
-
- ret = rn5t618_regulator_parse_dt(pdev);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
+ int i;

for (i = 0; i < RN5T618_REG_NUM; i++) {
- config.dev = &pdev->dev;
- config.init_data = rn5t618_matches[i].init_data;
- config.of_node = rn5t618_matches[i].of_node;
+ config.dev = pdev->dev.parent;
config.regmap = rn5t618->regmap;

rdev = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev,
--
1.9.1


2014-10-13 13:25:23

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: rn5t618: Convert to new style DT parsing

On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:19:08PM +0200, Beniamino Galvani wrote:
> Use the simplified DT parsing method to remove some duplicated
> code.
>
> Since this is a MFD subdevice and its device object doesn't have an
> associated DT node, the configuration instance used to register the
> regulators has been changed to point to the parent device.
>
> Signed-off-by: Beniamino Galvani <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/rn5t618-regulator.c | 51 +++--------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)

Applied, thanks. That's a particularly nice diffstat!


Attachments:
(No filename) (600.00 B)
signature.asc (473.00 B)
Digital signature
Download all attachments