2021-02-11 16:32:27

by Pritthijit Nath

Subject: [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Fixed issue with alignment in rf.c

This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should match open parenthesis".

Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
index 5b8da06e3916..bcd4d467e03a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int vnt_rf_set_txpower(struct vnt_private *priv, u8 power,

if (hw_value < ARRAY_SIZE(vt3226d0_lo_current_table)) {
ret = vnt_rf_write_embedded(priv,
- vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
+ vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
--
2.25.1

2021-02-11 20:32:25

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Fixed issue with alignment in rf.c

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 08:54:26PM +0530, Pritthijit Nath wrote:
> This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should match open parenthesis".
>
> Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> index 5b8da06e3916..bcd4d467e03a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int vnt_rf_set_txpower(struct vnt_private *priv, u8 power,
>
> if (hw_value < ARRAY_SIZE(vt3226d0_lo_current_table)) {
> ret = vnt_rf_write_embedded(priv,
> - vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
> + vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.25.1

Please run this change, with the changelog above, through
checkpatch.pl, fix that, and resend.

thanks,

greg k-h

2021-02-11 20:40:31

by Pritthijit Nath

Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Fixed issue with alignment in rf.c

On 12/02/21 1:59 am, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 08:54:26PM +0530, Pritthijit Nath wrote:
>> This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should match open parenthesis".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
>> index 5b8da06e3916..bcd4d467e03a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
>> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int vnt_rf_set_txpower(struct vnt_private *priv, u8 power,
>>
>> if (hw_value < ARRAY_SIZE(vt3226d0_lo_current_table)) {
>> ret = vnt_rf_write_embedded(priv,
>> - vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
>> + vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>
> Please run this change, with the changelog above, through
> checkpatch.pl, fix that, and resend.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should
match open parenthesis".

Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
index 5b8da06e3916..bcd4d467e03a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int vnt_rf_set_txpower(struct vnt_private *priv, u8 power,

if (hw_value < ARRAY_SIZE(vt3226d0_lo_current_table)) {
ret = vnt_rf_write_embedded(priv,
- vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
+ vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
--
2.25.1

2021-02-11 20:49:01

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Fixed issue with alignment in rf.c

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:07:50AM +0530, Pritthijit Nath wrote:
> On 12/02/21 1:59 am, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 08:54:26PM +0530, Pritthijit Nath wrote:
> >> This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should match open parenthesis".
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> >> index 5b8da06e3916..bcd4d467e03a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> >> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int vnt_rf_set_txpower(struct vnt_private *priv, u8 power,
> >>
> >> if (hw_value < ARRAY_SIZE(vt3226d0_lo_current_table)) {
> >> ret = vnt_rf_write_embedded(priv,
> >> - vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
> >> + vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >
> > Please run this change, with the changelog above, through
> > checkpatch.pl, fix that, and resend.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> >
>
> This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should
> match open parenthesis".
>
> Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> index 5b8da06e3916..bcd4d467e03a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int vnt_rf_set_txpower(struct vnt_private *priv, u8 power,
>
> if (hw_value < ARRAY_SIZE(vt3226d0_lo_current_table)) {
> ret = vnt_rf_write_embedded(priv,
> - vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
> + vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> }

I can't take this type of submission, do you see other patches submitted
this way on the mailing list?

Also, you have a trailing space in your changelog text :(

thanks,

greg k-h

2021-02-11 21:07:32

by Pritthijit Nath

Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Fixed issue with alignment in rf.c

On 12/02/21 2:14 am, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:07:50AM +0530, Pritthijit Nath wrote:
>> On 12/02/21 1:59 am, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 08:54:26PM +0530, Pritthijit Nath wrote:
>>>> This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should match open parenthesis".
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
>>>> index 5b8da06e3916..bcd4d467e03a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
>>>> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int vnt_rf_set_txpower(struct vnt_private *priv, u8 power,
>>>>
>>>> if (hw_value < ARRAY_SIZE(vt3226d0_lo_current_table)) {
>>>> ret = vnt_rf_write_embedded(priv,
>>>> - vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
>>>> + vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
>>>> if (ret)
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.25.1
>>>
>>> Please run this change, with the changelog above, through
>>> checkpatch.pl, fix that, and resend.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>>
>>> greg k-h
>>>
>>
>> This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should
>> match open parenthesis".
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
>> index 5b8da06e3916..bcd4d467e03a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
>> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int vnt_rf_set_txpower(struct vnt_private *priv, u8 power,
>>
>> if (hw_value < ARRAY_SIZE(vt3226d0_lo_current_table)) {
>> ret = vnt_rf_write_embedded(priv,
>> - vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
>> + vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
>> if (ret)
>> return ret;
>> }
>
> I can't take this type of submission, do you see other patches submitted
> this way on the mailing list?
Actually I am having a hard time since this one's my first. I would really appreciate if you could be a little clear. Should I resend the entire patch as a new thread?

>
> Also, you have a trailing space in your changelog text :(

Thanks for pointing out. Yes, I have fixed the trailing space.

>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>

2021-02-11 21:18:41

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: vt6656: Fixed issue with alignment in rf.c

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:32:51AM +0530, Pritthijit Nath wrote:
> On 12/02/21 2:14 am, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:07:50AM +0530, Pritthijit Nath wrote:
> >> On 12/02/21 1:59 am, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 08:54:26PM +0530, Pritthijit Nath wrote:
> >>>> This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should match open parenthesis".
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <[email protected]>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c | 2 +-
> >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> >>>> index 5b8da06e3916..bcd4d467e03a 100644
> >>>> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> >>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> >>>> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int vnt_rf_set_txpower(struct vnt_private *priv, u8 power,
> >>>>
> >>>> if (hw_value < ARRAY_SIZE(vt3226d0_lo_current_table)) {
> >>>> ret = vnt_rf_write_embedded(priv,
> >>>> - vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
> >>>> + vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
> >>>> if (ret)
> >>>> return ret;
> >>>> }
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.25.1
> >>>
> >>> Please run this change, with the changelog above, through
> >>> checkpatch.pl, fix that, and resend.
> >>>
> >>> thanks,
> >>>
> >>> greg k-h
> >>>
> >>
> >> This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should
> >> match open parenthesis".
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath <[email protected]>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> >> index 5b8da06e3916..bcd4d467e03a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rf.c
> >> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ static int vnt_rf_set_txpower(struct vnt_private *priv, u8 power,
> >>
> >> if (hw_value < ARRAY_SIZE(vt3226d0_lo_current_table)) {
> >> ret = vnt_rf_write_embedded(priv,
> >> - vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
> >> + vt3226d0_lo_current_table[hw_value]);
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >
> > I can't take this type of submission, do you see other patches submitted
> > this way on the mailing list?
> Actually I am having a hard time since this one's my first. I would really appreciate if you could be a little clear. Should I resend the entire patch as a new thread?

Of course, the kernel documentation says to do this, correct?

Look at the patches on the list for examples of how this works.

thanks,

greg k-h