2015-05-23 05:11:04

by Shailendra Verma

Subject: [PATCH] mm:cma - Fix for typos in comments.

Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <[email protected]>
---
mm/cma.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
index 3a7a67b..6612780 100644
--- a/mm/cma.c
+++ b/mm/cma.c
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
if (!size || !memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size))
return -EINVAL;

- /* ensure minimal alignment requied by mm core */
+ /* ensure minimal alignment required by mm core */
alignment = PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order);

/* alignment should be aligned with order_per_bit */
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base,
/*
* high_memory isn't direct mapped memory so retrieving its physical
* address isn't appropriate. But it would be useful to check the
- * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justfiable to get
+ * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justifiable to get
* the physical address from it. On x86 there is a validation check for
* this case, so the following workaround is needed to avoid it.
*/
--
1.7.9.5

2015-05-25 15:54:38

by Michal Nazarewicz

Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm:cma - Fix for typos in comments.

On Sat, May 23 2015, Shailendra Verma wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz <[email protected]>

> ---
> mm/cma.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c
> index 3a7a67b..6612780 100644
> --- a/mm/cma.c
> +++ b/mm/cma.c
> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size,
> if (!size || !memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - /* ensure minimal alignment requied by mm core */
> + /* ensure minimal alignment required by mm core */
> alignment = PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order);
>
> /* alignment should be aligned with order_per_bit */
> @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base,
> /*
> * high_memory isn't direct mapped memory so retrieving its physical
> * address isn't appropriate. But it would be useful to check the
> - * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justfiable to get
> + * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justifiable to get
> * the physical address from it. On x86 there is a validation check for
> * this case, so the following workaround is needed to avoid it.
> */
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>

--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał “mina86” Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +--<[email protected]>--<xmpp:[email protected]>--ooO--(_)--Ooo--