kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required
Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vaneet Narang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
index fec487d..a85cd08 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
@@ -1575,8 +1575,7 @@ void amdgpu_device_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
amdgpu_fence_driver_fini(adev);
amdgpu_fbdev_fini(adev);
r = amdgpu_fini(adev);
- if (adev->ip_block_enabled)
- kfree(adev->ip_block_enabled);
+ kfree(adev->ip_block_enabled);
adev->ip_block_enabled = NULL;
adev->accel_working = false;
/* free i2c buses */
--
1.7.9.5
On 26.06.2015 15:25, Maninder Singh wrote:
> kfree(NULL) is safe and this check is probably not required
>
> Signed-off-by: Maninder Singh <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Vaneet Narang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index fec487d..a85cd08 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -1575,8 +1575,7 @@ void amdgpu_device_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> amdgpu_fence_driver_fini(adev);
> amdgpu_fbdev_fini(adev);
> r = amdgpu_fini(adev);
> - if (adev->ip_block_enabled)
> - kfree(adev->ip_block_enabled);
> + kfree(adev->ip_block_enabled);
> adev->ip_block_enabled = NULL;
> adev->accel_working = false;
> /* free i2c buses */
>
The shortlog prefix of both your patches should be "drm/amdgpu:" instead
of "gpu/drm:". With that fixed, both are
Reviewed-by: Michel Dänzer <[email protected]>
--
Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com
Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
Hi,
>The shortlog prefix of both your patches should be "drm/amdgpu:" instead
>of "gpu/drm:". With that fixed, both are
Do i need to send V2 of patch with that change or you have fixed that?
>Reviewed-by: Michel D?nzer <[email protected]>
Thanks.
..........????{.n?+???????+%?????ݶ??w??{.n?+????{??G?????{ay?ʇڙ?,j??f???h?????????z_??(?階?ݢj"???m??????G????????????&???~???iO???z??v?^?m????????????I?