Replace ((x) >> PAGE_SHIFT) with the predefined PFN_DOWN macro.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <[email protected]>
---
arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c b/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c
index 075aaab..f7836c6 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c
@@ -25,4 +25,5 @@
#include <asm/m54xxgpt.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_MMU
#include <asm/mmu_context.h>
+#include <linux/pfn.h>
#endif
/***************************************************************************/
@@ -91,1 +92,1 @@ static void __init mcf54xx_bootmem_alloc(void)
m68k_memory[0].size = _ramend - _rambase;
/* compute total pages in system */
- num_pages = (_ramend - _rambase) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ num_pages = PFN_DOWN(_ramend - _rambase);
/* page numbers */
memstart = PAGE_ALIGN(_ramstart);
- min_low_pfn = _rambase >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- start_pfn = memstart >> PAGE_SHIFT;
- max_low_pfn = _ramend >> PAGE_SHIFT;
+ min_low_pfn = PFN_DOWN(_rambase);
+ start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(memstart);
+ max_low_pfn = PFN_DOWN(_ramend);
high_memory = (void *)_ramend;
m68k_virt_to_node_shift = fls(_ramend - _rambase - 1) - 6;
--
2.5.0
Hi Alexander,
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Alexander Kuleshov
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Replace ((x) >> PAGE_SHIFT) with the predefined PFN_DOWN macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c b/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c
> index 075aaab..f7836c6 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c
> +++ b/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c
> @@ -25,4 +25,5 @@
> #include <asm/m54xxgpt.h>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> +#include <linux/pfn.h>
> #endif
>
> /***************************************************************************/
> @@ -91,1 +92,1 @@ static void __init mcf54xx_bootmem_alloc(void)
The numbers in the above line don't make sense?
> m68k_memory[0].size = _ramend - _rambase;
>
> /* compute total pages in system */
> - num_pages = (_ramend - _rambase) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + num_pages = PFN_DOWN(_ramend - _rambase);
>
> /* page numbers */
> memstart = PAGE_ALIGN(_ramstart);
> - min_low_pfn = _rambase >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> - start_pfn = memstart >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> - max_low_pfn = _ramend >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + min_low_pfn = PFN_DOWN(_rambase);
> + start_pfn = PFN_DOWN(memstart);
> + max_low_pfn = PFN_DOWN(_ramend);
> high_memory = (void *)_ramend;
>
> m68k_virt_to_node_shift = fls(_ramend - _rambase - 1) - 6;
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
On 08-11-15, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Alexander Kuleshov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Replace ((x) >> PAGE_SHIFT) with the predefined PFN_DOWN macro.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kuleshov <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c | 9 +++++----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c b/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c
> > index 075aaab..f7836c6 100644
> > --- a/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/coldfire/m54xx.c
> > @@ -25,4 +25,5 @@
> > #include <asm/m54xxgpt.h>
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
> > #include <asm/mmu_context.h>
> > +#include <linux/pfn.h>
> > #endif
> >
> > /***************************************************************************/
> > @@ -91,1 +92,1 @@ static void __init mcf54xx_bootmem_alloc(void)
>
> The numbers in the above line don't make sense?
>
Hello Geert, Are you about `-91,1 +92,1....`? Or what numbers. If you are about
this, sorry for noise. I've checked the patch with the git apply --check and it
will return some errors.
If other things are normal I will resend correct patch.
Thank you.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Alexander Kuleshov
<[email protected]> wrote:
>> > @@ -91,1 +92,1 @@ static void __init mcf54xx_bootmem_alloc(void)
>>
>> The numbers in the above line don't make sense?
>
> Hello Geert, Are you about `-91,1 +92,1....`? Or what numbers. If you are about
Yes.
> this, sorry for noise. I've checked the patch with the git apply --check and it
> will return some errors.
Indeed.
> If other things are normal I will resend correct patch.
OK, awaiting the update...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- [email protected]
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds