Currently there is no way to easily differentiate multiple
watchdog devices. The watchdogs are named by the order they
are probed.
1st probed watchdog: /dev/watchdog0
2nd probed watchdog: /dev/watchdog1
...
This change uses the alias of the watchdog device node for
the name of the watchdog.
aliases {
watchdog0 = "/...../...."
watchdog3 = "/..../....."
watchdog2 = "/..../....."
...
}
This will translate to...
/dev/watchdog0
/dev/watchdog3
/dev/watchdog2
Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
index 6aaefba..52b1f0b 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
#include <linux/miscdevice.h> /* For handling misc devices */
#include <linux/init.h> /* For __init/__exit/... */
#include <linux/uaccess.h> /* For copy_to_user/put_user/... */
+#include <linux/of.h>
#include "watchdog_core.h"
@@ -522,7 +523,13 @@ static struct miscdevice watchdog_miscdev = {
int watchdog_dev_register(struct watchdog_device *watchdog)
{
- int err, devno;
+ int err, devno, ret;
+
+ if (watchdog->parent) {
+ ret = of_alias_get_id(watchdog->parent->of_node, "watchdog");
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ watchdog->id = ret;
+ }
if (watchdog->id == 0) {
old_wdd = watchdog;
--
2.1.0
On 08/28/2015 02:58 PM, Justin Chen wrote:
> Currently there is no way to easily differentiate multiple
> watchdog devices. The watchdogs are named by the order they
> are probed.
> 1st probed watchdog: /dev/watchdog0
> 2nd probed watchdog: /dev/watchdog1
> ...
>
> This change uses the alias of the watchdog device node for
> the name of the watchdog.
> aliases {
> watchdog0 = "/...../...."
> watchdog3 = "/..../....."
> watchdog2 = "/..../....."
> ...
> }
>
> This will translate to...
> /dev/watchdog0
> /dev/watchdog3
> /dev/watchdog2
>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <[email protected]>
Interesting idea. Checking through other subsystems, many others do the same,
so it makes sense to use that mechanism.
However, the id assignment should be in the calling code, in __watchdog_register_device,
to avoid that another id, possibly conflicting, is assigned through the ida mechanism.
This is a bit more complicated than it looks like to ensure correct id assignment.
Have a look into the i2c code to see how it is handled. Essentially we must pass
the requested number to ida_simple_get().
Thanks,
Guenter
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> index 6aaefba..52b1f0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/watchdog_dev.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> #include <linux/miscdevice.h> /* For handling misc devices */
> #include <linux/init.h> /* For __init/__exit/... */
> #include <linux/uaccess.h> /* For copy_to_user/put_user/... */
> +#include <linux/of.h>
>
> #include "watchdog_core.h"
>
> @@ -522,7 +523,13 @@ static struct miscdevice watchdog_miscdev = {
>
> int watchdog_dev_register(struct watchdog_device *watchdog)
> {
> - int err, devno;
> + int err, devno, ret;
> +
> + if (watchdog->parent) {
> + ret = of_alias_get_id(watchdog->parent->of_node, "watchdog");
> + if (ret >= 0)
> + watchdog->id = ret;
> + }
>
> if (watchdog->id == 0) {
> old_wdd = watchdog;
>