2016-03-02 16:04:53

by Nicolas Ferre

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 4.6 #2

Arnd, Olof, Kevin,

A second batch of DT updates for 4.6. This time it is based on 4.5-rc3 as one
of the patches fixes an node that was changed during 4.5-rc phase. As I saw
that your "next/dt" branches are based on 4.5-rc3, I thought it wouldn't be a
problem.
Overall a pretty simple series with mainly node addition for the latest SoC
and its Xplained board.
The tag doesn't embed Alexandre's previous DT Pull-Request for 4.6 that was
based on 4.5-rc1. I verified though that it doesn't conflict with it during a
merge.

Thanks, best regards,

The following changes since commit 388f7b1d6e8ca06762e2454d28d6c3c55ad0fe95:

Linux 4.5-rc3 (2016-02-07 15:38:30 -0800)

are available in the git repository at:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nferre/linux-at91.git tags/at91-dt2

for you to fetch changes up to ed0f4b3ffcdbd2b47a0b24035bb6f22464c9fef1:

ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2 Xplained: add leds node (2016-03-02 16:55:37 +0100)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Second 4.6 DT series, all patches for sama5d2 and its Xplained board:
- addition of the NAND flash node
- addition of the dma properties for UART/USART nodes
- one update of the sama5d2 Xplained phy node
- addition of USB pinmux, button and leds

----------------------------------------------------------------
Cyrille Pitchen (1):
ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2 Xplained: set pin muxing for usb gadget and usb host

Ludovic Desroches (1):
ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2 Xplained: add user push button

Nicolas Ferre (1):
ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: add dma properties to UART nodes

Romain Izard (2):
ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2 Xplained: Correct the macb irq pinctrl node
ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2: add nand0 and nfc0 nodes

Wenyou Yang (1):
ARM: dts: at91: sama5d2 Xplained: add leds node

arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-sama5d2_xplained.dts | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/sama5d2.dtsi | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 143 insertions(+)

--
Nicolas Ferre


2016-03-02 20:54:11

by Arnd Bergmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 4.6 #2

On Wednesday 02 March 2016 17:05:22 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> A second batch of DT updates for 4.6. This time it is based on 4.5-rc3 as one
> of the patches fixes an node that was changed during 4.5-rc phase. As I saw
> that your "next/dt" branches are based on 4.5-rc3, I thought it wouldn't be a
> problem.

Right, thanks for checking.

> Overall a pretty simple series with mainly node addition for the latest SoC
> and its Xplained board.
> The tag doesn't embed Alexandre's previous DT Pull-Request for 4.6 that was
> based on 4.5-rc1. I verified though that it doesn't conflict with it during a
> merge.

Ok, that is good too. Pulled into next/dt now.

I see that your gpg key has expired last week, you may want to do something
about that, I think you can just update the date rather than creating a
new key.

Arnd

2016-03-02 21:07:54

by Alexandre Belloni

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 4.6 #2

Hi,

On 02/03/2016 at 21:50:59 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> I see that your gpg key has expired last week, you may want to do something
> about that, I think you can just update the date rather than creating a
> new key.
>

You probably want to pull his key, it was updated today.


--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

2016-03-02 21:30:41

by Arnd Bergmann

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 4.6 #2

On Wednesday 02 March 2016 22:07:50 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 at 21:50:59 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> > I see that your gpg key has expired last week, you may want to do something
> > about that, I think you can just update the date rather than creating a
> > new key.
> >
>
> You probably want to pull his key, it was updated today.
>

Ah, of course.

Arnd

2016-03-03 08:47:21

by Nicolas Ferre

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: dt for 4.6 #2

Le 02/03/2016 22:27, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit :
> On Wednesday 02 March 2016 22:07:50 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 02/03/2016 at 21:50:59 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
>>> I see that your gpg key has expired last week, you may want to do something
>>> about that, I think you can just update the date rather than creating a
>>> new key.
>>>
>>
>> You probably want to pull his key, it was updated today.
>>
>
> Ah, of course.

Yes, with advices from Alexandre and Maxime, I did it just before
signing my tag.

Thanks for the heads up. Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre