2016-04-08 22:26:53

by Santosh Shilimkar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [net-next][PATCH 0/2] RDS: couple of fixes for 4.6

Patches are also available at below git tree.

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ssantosh/linux.git for_4.6/net-next/rds-fixes

Qing Huang (1):
RDS: fix endianness for dp_ack_seq

Santosh Shilimkar (1):
RDS: Fix the atomicity for congestion map update

net/rds/cong.c | 4 ++--
net/rds/ib_cm.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--
1.9.1


2016-04-08 22:26:53

by Santosh Shilimkar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [net-next][PATCH 1/2] RDS: fix endianness for dp_ack_seq

From: Qing Huang <[email protected]>

dp->dp_ack_seq is used in big endian format. We need to do the
big endianness conversion when we assign a value in host format
to it.

Signed-off-by: Qing Huang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
---
net/rds/ib_cm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/rds/ib_cm.c b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
index 8764970..310cabc 100644
--- a/net/rds/ib_cm.c
+++ b/net/rds/ib_cm.c
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@ static void rds_ib_cm_fill_conn_param(struct rds_connection *conn,
dp->dp_protocol_major = RDS_PROTOCOL_MAJOR(protocol_version);
dp->dp_protocol_minor = RDS_PROTOCOL_MINOR(protocol_version);
dp->dp_protocol_minor_mask = cpu_to_be16(RDS_IB_SUPPORTED_PROTOCOLS);
- dp->dp_ack_seq = rds_ib_piggyb_ack(ic);
+ dp->dp_ack_seq = cpu_to_be64(rds_ib_piggyb_ack(ic));

/* Advertise flow control */
if (ic->i_flowctl) {
--
1.9.1

2016-04-08 22:26:52

by Santosh Shilimkar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [net-next][PATCH 2/2] RDS: Fix the atomicity for congestion map update

Two different threads with different rds sockets may be in
rds_recv_rcvbuf_delta() via receive path. If their ports
both map to the same word in the congestion map, then
using non-atomic ops to update it could cause the map to
be incorrect. Lets use atomics to avoid such an issue.

Full credit to Wengang <[email protected]> for
finding the issue, analysing it and also pointing out
to offending code with spin lock based fix.

Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Wengang Wang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
---
net/rds/cong.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rds/cong.c b/net/rds/cong.c
index e6144b8..6641bcf 100644
--- a/net/rds/cong.c
+++ b/net/rds/cong.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ void rds_cong_set_bit(struct rds_cong_map *map, __be16 port)
i = be16_to_cpu(port) / RDS_CONG_MAP_PAGE_BITS;
off = be16_to_cpu(port) % RDS_CONG_MAP_PAGE_BITS;

- __set_bit_le(off, (void *)map->m_page_addrs[i]);
+ set_bit_le(off, (void *)map->m_page_addrs[i]);
}

void rds_cong_clear_bit(struct rds_cong_map *map, __be16 port)
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ void rds_cong_clear_bit(struct rds_cong_map *map, __be16 port)
i = be16_to_cpu(port) / RDS_CONG_MAP_PAGE_BITS;
off = be16_to_cpu(port) % RDS_CONG_MAP_PAGE_BITS;

- __clear_bit_le(off, (void *)map->m_page_addrs[i]);
+ clear_bit_le(off, (void *)map->m_page_addrs[i]);
}

static int rds_cong_test_bit(struct rds_cong_map *map, __be16 port)
--
1.9.1

2016-04-14 03:36:42

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [net-next][PATCH 0/2] RDS: couple of fixes for 4.6

From: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:26:38 -0700

> Patches are also available at below git tree.
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ssantosh/linux.git for_4.6/net-next/rds-fixes

"Bug fixes for 4.6" do not get targetted at the net-next tree, that's
for 4.7 development.

2016-04-14 17:44:56

by Santosh Shilimkar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [net-next][PATCH 0/2] RDS: couple of fixes for 4.6

On 4/13/16 8:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:26:38 -0700
>
>> Patches are also available at below git tree.
>>
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ssantosh/linux.git for_4.6/net-next/rds-fixes
>
> "Bug fixes for 4.6" do not get targetted at the net-next tree, that's
> for 4.7 development.
>
Sorry. Should have based it against 'net'. Just posted re-based version.
Thanks !!

Regards,
Santosh