2016-11-12 22:11:29

by Walt Feasel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] [STYLE 1/2]staging:dgnc:dgnc_neo.c block comment modifications

Modified block comments for style consistency

Signed-off-by: Walt Feasel <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
index 5becb37..03fc58e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/dgnc/dgnc_neo.c
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_cts_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
/* Turn off auto Xon flow control */
efr &= ~UART_17158_EFR_IXON;

- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
* out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -145,7 +146,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_rts_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
ier &= ~UART_17158_IER_XOFF;
efr &= ~UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF;

- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
* out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -185,7 +187,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_ixon_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
/* Turn on auto Xon flow control */
efr |= (UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXON);

- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
* out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -225,7 +228,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_ixoff_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
ier |= UART_17158_IER_XOFF;
efr |= (UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF);

- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
* out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -268,7 +272,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_no_input_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
else
efr &= ~(UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXOFF);

- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero
* it out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -308,7 +313,8 @@ static inline void neo_set_no_output_flow_control(struct channel_t *ch)
else
efr &= ~(UART_17158_EFR_ECB | UART_17158_EFR_IXON);

- /* Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
+ /*
+ * Why? Because Exar's spec says we have to zero it
* out before setting it
*/
writeb(0, &ch->ch_neo_uart->efr);
@@ -413,7 +419,8 @@ static inline void neo_parse_isr(struct dgnc_board *brd, uint port)
/* Read data from uart -> queue */
neo_copy_data_from_uart_to_queue(ch);

- /* Call our tty layer to enforce queue
+ /*
+ * Call our tty layer to enforce queue
* flow control if needed.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(&ch->ch_lock, flags);
@@ -438,7 +445,8 @@ static inline void neo_parse_isr(struct dgnc_board *brd, uint port)
* one it was, so we can suspend or resume data flow.
*/
if (cause == UART_17158_XON_DETECT) {
- /* Is output stopped right now, if so,
+ /*
+ * Is output stopped right now, if so,
* resume it
*/
if (brd->channels[port]->ch_flags & CH_STOP) {
--
2.1.4