2016-11-22 12:57:59

by Bartosz Golaszewski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] da8xx: fix section mismatch in new drivers

Sekhar noticed there's a section mismatch in the da8xx-mstpri and
da8xx-ddrctl drivers. This is caused by calling
of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() which has an __init annotation.

This series addresses this issue by open coding routines that return
the machine compatible string in both drivers. Once a general function
for that in of/base is merged, we'll remove them.

v1 -> v2:
- drop patch [1/3] from v1
- introduce internal routines in the drivers instead of a general
function in of/base.c

Bartosz Golaszewski (2):
bus: da8xx-mstpri: drop the call to of_flat_dt_get_machine_name()
memory: da8xx-ddrctl: drop the call to of_flat_dt_get_machine_name()

drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--
2.9.3


2016-11-22 12:58:02

by Bartosz Golaszewski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] memory: da8xx-ddrctl: drop the call to of_flat_dt_get_machine_name()

In order to avoid a section mismatch use a locally implemented routine
instead of of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() when printing the error
message.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
---
drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c b/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c
index a20e7bb..ee0c266 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/io.h>

@@ -71,6 +70,25 @@ static const struct da8xx_ddrctl_board_settings da8xx_ddrctl_board_confs[] = {
},
};

+/*
+ * FIXME Remove this function once of/base gets a general routine for getting
+ * the machine model/compatible string.
+ */
+static const char *da8xx_ddrctl_machine_get_compatible(void)
+{
+ struct device_node *root;
+ const char *compatible;
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+ if (root) {
+ ret = of_property_read_string(root, "compatible", &compatible);
+ of_node_put(root);
+ }
+
+ return ret ? NULL : compatible;
+}
+
static const struct da8xx_ddrctl_config_knob *
da8xx_ddrctl_match_knob(const struct da8xx_ddrctl_setting *setting)
{
@@ -118,7 +136,7 @@ static int da8xx_ddrctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
setting = da8xx_ddrctl_get_board_settings();
if (!setting) {
dev_err(dev, "no settings for board '%s'\n",
- of_flat_dt_get_machine_name());
+ da8xx_ddrctl_machine_get_compatible());
return -EINVAL;
}

--
2.9.3

2016-11-22 12:58:17

by Bartosz Golaszewski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] bus: da8xx-mstpri: drop the call to of_flat_dt_get_machine_name()

In order to avoid a section mismatch use a locally implemented routine
instead of of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() when printing the error
message.

Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
---
drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c b/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
index 85f0b53..bd38170 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
-#include <linux/of_fdt.h>

/*
* REVISIT: Linux doesn't have a good framework for the kind of performance
@@ -190,6 +189,25 @@ static const struct da8xx_mstpri_board_priorities da8xx_mstpri_board_confs[] = {
},
};

+/*
+ * FIXME Remove this function once of/base gets a general routine for getting
+ * the machine model/compatible string.
+ */
+static const char *da8xx_mstpri_machine_get_compatible(void)
+{
+ struct device_node *root;
+ const char *compatible;
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+ if (root) {
+ ret = of_property_read_string(root, "compatible", &compatible);
+ of_node_put(root);
+ }
+
+ return ret ? NULL : compatible;
+}
+
static const struct da8xx_mstpri_board_priorities *
da8xx_mstpri_get_board_prio(void)
{
@@ -227,7 +245,7 @@ static int da8xx_mstpri_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
prio_list = da8xx_mstpri_get_board_prio();
if (!prio_list) {
dev_err(dev, "no master priotities defined for board '%s'\n",
- of_flat_dt_get_machine_name());
+ da8xx_mstpri_machine_get_compatible());
return -EINVAL;
}

--
2.9.3