Sekhar noticed there's a section mismatch in the da8xx-mstpri and
da8xx-ddrctl drivers. This is caused by calling
of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() which has an __init annotation.
This series addresses this issue by open coding routines that return
the machine compatible string in both drivers. Once a general function
for that in of/base is merged, we'll remove them.
The third patch fixes a typo that got in last time.
v1 -> v2:
- drop patch [1/3] from v1
- introduce internal routines in the drivers instead of a general
function in of/base.c
v2 -> v3:
- use of_property_read_string_index() instead of
of_property_read_string() to get the first compatible entry
- s/priotities/priorities
Bartosz Golaszewski (3):
bus: da8xx-mstpri: drop the call to of_flat_dt_get_machine_name()
memory: da8xx-ddrctl: drop the call to of_flat_dt_get_machine_name()
bus: da8xx-mstpri: fix a typo
drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--
2.9.3
In order to avoid a section mismatch use a locally implemented routine
instead of of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() when printing the error
message.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
---
drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c b/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c
index a20e7bb..1b962ee 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/da8xx-ddrctl.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
-#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
@@ -71,6 +70,26 @@ static const struct da8xx_ddrctl_board_settings da8xx_ddrctl_board_confs[] = {
},
};
+/*
+ * FIXME Remove this function once of/base gets a general routine for getting
+ * the machine model/compatible string.
+ */
+static const char *da8xx_ddrctl_machine_get_compatible(void)
+{
+ struct device_node *root;
+ const char *compatible;
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+ if (root) {
+ ret = of_property_read_string_index(root, "compatible",
+ 0, &compatible);
+ of_node_put(root);
+ }
+
+ return ret ? NULL : compatible;
+}
+
static const struct da8xx_ddrctl_config_knob *
da8xx_ddrctl_match_knob(const struct da8xx_ddrctl_setting *setting)
{
@@ -118,7 +137,7 @@ static int da8xx_ddrctl_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
setting = da8xx_ddrctl_get_board_settings();
if (!setting) {
dev_err(dev, "no settings for board '%s'\n",
- of_flat_dt_get_machine_name());
+ da8xx_ddrctl_machine_get_compatible());
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.9.3
Should have been priorities.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
---
drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c b/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
index 064eeb9..b17ba97 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
@@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int da8xx_mstpri_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
prio_list = da8xx_mstpri_get_board_prio();
if (!prio_list) {
- dev_err(dev, "no master priotities defined for board '%s'\n",
+ dev_err(dev, "no master priorities defined for board '%s'\n",
da8xx_mstpri_machine_get_compatible());
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.9.3
In order to avoid a section mismatch use a locally implemented routine
instead of of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() when printing the error
message.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
---
drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c b/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
index 85f0b53..064eeb9 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
-#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
/*
* REVISIT: Linux doesn't have a good framework for the kind of performance
@@ -190,6 +189,26 @@ static const struct da8xx_mstpri_board_priorities da8xx_mstpri_board_confs[] = {
},
};
+/*
+ * FIXME Remove this function once of/base gets a general routine for getting
+ * the machine model/compatible string.
+ */
+static const char *da8xx_mstpri_machine_get_compatible(void)
+{
+ struct device_node *root;
+ const char *compatible;
+ int ret = -1;
+
+ root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
+ if (root) {
+ ret = of_property_read_string_index(root, "compatible",
+ 0, &compatible);
+ of_node_put(root);
+ }
+
+ return ret ? NULL : compatible;
+}
+
static const struct da8xx_mstpri_board_priorities *
da8xx_mstpri_get_board_prio(void)
{
@@ -227,7 +246,7 @@ static int da8xx_mstpri_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
prio_list = da8xx_mstpri_get_board_prio();
if (!prio_list) {
dev_err(dev, "no master priotities defined for board '%s'\n",
- of_flat_dt_get_machine_name());
+ da8xx_mstpri_machine_get_compatible());
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.9.3
Hi Bartosz,
On Wednesday 23 November 2016 04:36 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> In order to avoid a section mismatch use a locally implemented routine
> instead of of_flat_dt_get_machine_name() when printing the error
> message.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c b/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
> index 85f0b53..064eeb9 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/da8xx-mstpri.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> -#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
>
> /*
> * REVISIT: Linux doesn't have a good framework for the kind of performance
> @@ -190,6 +189,26 @@ static const struct da8xx_mstpri_board_priorities da8xx_mstpri_board_confs[] = {
> },
> };
>
> +/*
> + * FIXME Remove this function once of/base gets a general routine for getting
> + * the machine model/compatible string.
> + */
> +static const char *da8xx_mstpri_machine_get_compatible(void)
> +{
> + struct device_node *root;
> + const char *compatible;
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + root = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> + if (root) {
> + ret = of_property_read_string_index(root, "compatible",
> + 0, &compatible);
> + of_node_put(root);
> + }
> +
> + return ret ? NULL : compatible;
> +}
As I just noted in the thread for v1 of this patch, calling
of_node_put(root) while keeping a reference to its compatible property
for later use sounds really broken.
I think it is safest to fix this by not including the compatible name in
error message at all. The error message will be little less descriptive,
but thats better than adding questionable code.
Thats what Frank suggested first up, but I did not realize at that time
that printing compatible name will be this much effort.
Can you please send a v4?
Thanks,
Sekhar