2016-12-22 04:19:00

by Geoff Lansberry

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] NFC: trf7970a: add device tree option for 27MHz clock

The TRF7970A has configuration options to support hardware designs
which use a 27.12MHz clock. This commit adds a device tree option
'clock-frequency' to support configuring the this chip for default
13.56MHz clock or the optional 27.12MHz clock.

Signed-off-by: Geoff Lansberry <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt | 2 +
drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt
index 32b35a0..8b01fc81 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Optional SoC Specific Properties:
- t5t-rmb-extra-byte-quirk: Specify that the trf7970a has the erratum
where an extra byte is returned by Read Multiple Block commands issued
to Type 5 tags.
+- clock-frequency: Set to specify that the input frequency to the trf7970a is 13560000Hz or 27120000Hz

Example (for ARM-based BeagleBone with TRF7970A on SPI1):

@@ -43,6 +44,7 @@ Example (for ARM-based BeagleBone with TRF7970A on SPI1):
irq-status-read-quirk;
en2-rf-quirk;
t5t-rmb-extra-byte-quirk;
+ clock-frequency = <27120000>;
status = "okay";
};
};
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
index 26c9dbb..b1cd4ef 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
@@ -124,6 +124,9 @@
NFC_PROTO_ISO15693_MASK | NFC_PROTO_NFC_DEP_MASK)

#define TRF7970A_AUTOSUSPEND_DELAY 30000 /* 30 seconds */
+#define TRF7970A_13MHZ_CLOCK_FREQUENCY 13560000
+#define TRF7970A_27MHZ_CLOCK_FREQUENCY 27120000
+

#define TRF7970A_RX_SKB_ALLOC_SIZE 256

@@ -1056,12 +1059,11 @@ static int trf7970a_init(struct trf7970a *trf)

trf->chip_status_ctrl &= ~TRF7970A_CHIP_STATUS_RF_ON;

- ret = trf7970a_write(trf, TRF7970A_MODULATOR_SYS_CLK_CTRL, 0);
+ ret = trf7970a_write(trf, TRF7970A_MODULATOR_SYS_CLK_CTRL,
+ trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl);
if (ret)
goto err_out;

- trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl = 0;
-
ret = trf7970a_write(trf, TRF7970A_ADJUTABLE_FIFO_IRQ_LEVELS,
TRF7970A_ADJUTABLE_FIFO_IRQ_LEVELS_WLH_96 |
TRF7970A_ADJUTABLE_FIFO_IRQ_LEVELS_WLL_32);
@@ -1181,27 +1183,37 @@ static int trf7970a_in_config_rf_tech(struct trf7970a *trf, int tech)
switch (tech) {
case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106A:
trf->iso_ctrl_tech = TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_14443A_106;
- trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl = TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_OOK;
+ trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl =
+ (trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl & 0xf8) |
+ TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_OOK;
trf->guard_time = TRF7970A_GUARD_TIME_NFCA;
break;
case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_106B:
trf->iso_ctrl_tech = TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_14443B_106;
- trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl = TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_ASK10;
+ trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl =
+ (trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl & 0xf8) |
+ TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_ASK10;
trf->guard_time = TRF7970A_GUARD_TIME_NFCB;
break;
case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_212F:
trf->iso_ctrl_tech = TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_FELICA_212;
- trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl = TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_ASK10;
+ trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl =
+ (trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl & 0xf8) |
+ TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_ASK10;
trf->guard_time = TRF7970A_GUARD_TIME_NFCF;
break;
case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_424F:
trf->iso_ctrl_tech = TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_FELICA_424;
- trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl = TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_ASK10;
+ trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl =
+ (trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl & 0xf8) |
+ TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_ASK10;
trf->guard_time = TRF7970A_GUARD_TIME_NFCF;
break;
case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_ISO15693:
trf->iso_ctrl_tech = TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_15693_SGL_1OF4_2648;
- trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl = TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_OOK;
+ trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl =
+ (trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl & 0xf8) |
+ TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_OOK;
trf->guard_time = TRF7970A_GUARD_TIME_15693;
break;
default:
@@ -1571,17 +1583,23 @@ static int trf7970a_tg_config_rf_tech(struct trf7970a *trf, int tech)
trf->iso_ctrl_tech = TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_NFC_NFC_CE_MODE |
TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_NFC_CE |
TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_NFC_CE_14443A;
- trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl = TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_OOK;
+ trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl =
+ (trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl & 0xf8) |
+ TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_OOK;
break;
case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_212F:
trf->iso_ctrl_tech = TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_NFC_NFC_CE_MODE |
TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_NFC_NFCF_212;
- trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl = TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_ASK10;
+ trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl =
+ (trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl & 0xf8) |
+ TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_ASK10;
break;
case NFC_DIGITAL_RF_TECH_424F:
trf->iso_ctrl_tech = TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_NFC_NFC_CE_MODE |
TRF7970A_ISO_CTRL_NFC_NFCF_424;
- trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl = TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_ASK10;
+ trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl =
+ (trf->modulator_sys_clk_ctrl & 0xf8) |
+ TRF7970A_MODULATOR_DEPTH_ASK10;
break;
default:
dev_dbg(trf->dev, "Unsupported rf technology: %d\n", tech);
@@ -1987,6 +2005,7 @@ static int trf7970a_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
struct device_node *np = spi->dev.of_node;
struct trf7970a *trf;
int uvolts, autosuspend_delay, ret;
+ u32 clk_freq = TRF7970A_13MHZ_CLOCK_FREQUENCY;

if (!np) {
dev_err(&spi->dev, "No Device Tree entry\n");
@@ -2043,6 +2062,15 @@ static int trf7970a_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
return ret;
}

+ of_property_read_u32(np, "clock-frequency", &clk_freq);
+ if ((clk_freq != TRF7970A_27MHZ_CLOCK_FREQUENCY) ||
+ (clk_freq != TRF7970A_13MHZ_CLOCK_FREQUENCY)) {
+ dev_err(trf->dev,
+ "clock-frequency (%u Hz) unsupported\n",
+ clk_freq);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (of_property_read_bool(np, "en2-rf-quirk"))
trf->quirks |= TRF7970A_QUIRK_EN2_MUST_STAY_LOW;

--
2.7.4


2016-12-22 04:19:32

by Geoff Lansberry

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] NFC: trf7970a: Add device tree option of 1.8 Volt IO voltage

The TRF7970A has configuration options for supporting hardware designs
with 1.8 Volt or 3.3 Volt IO. This commit adds a device tree option,
using a fixed regulator binding, for setting the io voltage to match
the hardware configuration. If no option is supplied it defaults to
3.3 volt configuration.

Signed-off-by: Geoff Lansberry <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt | 2 ++
drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt
index 8b01fc81..b5777d8 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Optional SoC Specific Properties:
- t5t-rmb-extra-byte-quirk: Specify that the trf7970a has the erratum
where an extra byte is returned by Read Multiple Block commands issued
to Type 5 tags.
+- vdd-io-supply: Regulator specifying voltage for vdd-io
- clock-frequency: Set to specify that the input frequency to the trf7970a is 13560000Hz or 27120000Hz

Example (for ARM-based BeagleBone with TRF7970A on SPI1):
@@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ Example (for ARM-based BeagleBone with TRF7970A on SPI1):
<&gpio2 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
vin-supply = <&ldo3_reg>;
vin-voltage-override = <5000000>;
+ vdd-io-supply = <&ldo2_reg>;
autosuspend-delay = <30000>;
irq-status-read-quirk;
en2-rf-quirk;
diff --git a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
index b1cd4ef..e3c72c6 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
@@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ struct trf7970a {
u8 iso_ctrl_tech;
u8 modulator_sys_clk_ctrl;
u8 special_fcn_reg1;
+ u8 io_ctrl;
unsigned int guard_time;
int technology;
int framing;
@@ -1051,6 +1052,11 @@ static int trf7970a_init(struct trf7970a *trf)
if (ret)
goto err_out;

+ ret = trf7970a_write(trf, TRF7970A_REG_IO_CTRL,
+ trf->io_ctrl | TRF7970A_REG_IO_CTRL_VRS(0x1));
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_out;
+
ret = trf7970a_write(trf, TRF7970A_NFC_TARGET_LEVEL, 0);
if (ret)
goto err_out;
@@ -1767,7 +1773,7 @@ static int _trf7970a_tg_listen(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev, u16 timeout,
goto out_err;

ret = trf7970a_write(trf, TRF7970A_REG_IO_CTRL,
- TRF7970A_REG_IO_CTRL_VRS(0x1));
+ trf->io_ctrl | TRF7970A_REG_IO_CTRL_VRS(0x1));
if (ret)
goto out_err;

@@ -2105,6 +2111,24 @@ static int trf7970a_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
if (uvolts > 4000000)
trf->chip_status_ctrl = TRF7970A_CHIP_STATUS_VRS5_3;

+ trf->regulator = devm_regulator_get(&spi->dev, "vdd-io");
+ if (IS_ERR(trf->regulator)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(trf->regulator);
+ dev_err(trf->dev, "Can't get VDD_IO regulator: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err_destroy_lock;
+ }
+
+ ret = regulator_enable(trf->regulator);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(trf->dev, "Can't enable VDD_IO: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err_destroy_lock;
+ }
+
+ if (regulator_get_voltage(trf->regulator) == 1800000) {
+ trf->io_ctrl = TRF7970A_REG_IO_CTRL_IO_LOW;
+ dev_dbg(trf->dev, "trf7970a config vdd_io to 1.8V\n");
+ }
+
trf->ddev = nfc_digital_allocate_device(&trf7970a_nfc_ops,
TRF7970A_SUPPORTED_PROTOCOLS,
NFC_DIGITAL_DRV_CAPS_IN_CRC |
--
2.7.4

2016-12-22 04:19:34

by Geoff Lansberry

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/3] nfc: trf7970a: Prevent repeated polling from crashing the kernel

From: Jaret Cantu <[email protected]>

Repeated polling attempts cause a NULL dereference error to occur.
This is because the state of the trf7970a is currently reading but
another request has been made to send a command before it has finished.

The solution is to properly kill the waiting reading (workqueue)
before failing on the send.

Signed-off-by: Geoff Lansberry <[email protected]>
---
drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
index e3c72c6..ba5f9b8 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c
@@ -1496,6 +1496,10 @@ static int trf7970a_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
(trf->state != TRF7970A_ST_IDLE_RX_BLOCKED)) {
dev_err(trf->dev, "%s - Bogus state: %d\n", __func__,
trf->state);
+ if (trf->state == TRF7970A_ST_WAIT_FOR_RX_DATA ||
+ trf->state == TRF7970A_ST_WAIT_FOR_RX_DATA_CONT)
+ trf->ignore_timeout =
+ !cancel_delayed_work(&trf->timeout_work);
ret = -EIO;
goto out_err;
}
--
2.7.4

2016-12-22 23:01:38

by Rob Herring

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] NFC: trf7970a: add device tree option for 27MHz clock

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:18:32PM -0500, Geoff Lansberry wrote:
> The TRF7970A has configuration options to support hardware designs
> which use a 27.12MHz clock. This commit adds a device tree option
> 'clock-frequency' to support configuring the this chip for default
> 13.56MHz clock or the optional 27.12MHz clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geoff Lansberry <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt | 2 +

Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>

> drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

2016-12-22 23:02:31

by Rob Herring

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] NFC: trf7970a: Add device tree option of 1.8 Volt IO voltage

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:18:33PM -0500, Geoff Lansberry wrote:
> The TRF7970A has configuration options for supporting hardware designs
> with 1.8 Volt or 3.3 Volt IO. This commit adds a device tree option,
> using a fixed regulator binding, for setting the io voltage to match
> the hardware configuration. If no option is supplied it defaults to
> 3.3 volt configuration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geoff Lansberry <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt | 2 ++

Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>

> drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

2016-12-24 06:01:46

by Mark Greer

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] nfc: trf7970a: Prevent repeated polling from crashing the kernel

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:18:34PM -0500, Geoff Lansberry wrote:
> From: Jaret Cantu <[email protected]>
>
> Repeated polling attempts cause a NULL dereference error to occur.
> This is because the state of the trf7970a is currently reading but
> another request has been made to send a command before it has finished.
>
> The solution is to properly kill the waiting reading (workqueue)
> before failing on the send.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geoff Lansberry <[email protected]>
> ---

You've still provided virtually no information on the actual problem(s)
nor justified why you think this is the best solution. You're adding
code to a section of code that should _never_ be executed so the only
reasonable things I can infer is that there are, at least, two problems:

1) There is a bug causing execution to get into this block of code.

2) Once in this block of code, there is another bug.

You seem to be attempting to fix 2) and completely ignoring 1).
1) is the first bug that needs to be root-caused and fixed.

Also, what exactly is the "NULL dereference error" you mention?
Is this the neard crash you talked about in another thread or is
this a kernel crash? If it is the kernel crash, please post the
relevant information. If this is the neard crash - which seems
unlikely - then how can changing a section of kernel code that
shouldn't be executed in the first place fix that?

Mark
--

2016-12-24 16:18:03

by Geoff Lansberry

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] nfc: trf7970a: Prevent repeated polling from crashing the kernel

Mark - I'm sorry, but I did not write this code, and therefore was not
able to accurately describe it. It is fixing a different issue, not
the neard segfault that we are still chasing. Last week Jaret Cantu
sent a separate email explaining the purpose of the code, which had
you copied, did you see that? Does it explain why it was done to
your satisfaction? I've asked him to join in on the effort to push
the change upstream, however he will not be available until the new
year.

I know you did suggest that we split off that change from the others,
and if now is the time to do that, let me know. If you don't have
the email from Jaret, also please let me know and I will forward it to
you.

Geoff
Geoff Lansberry


Engineering Guy
Kuvée, Inc
125 Kingston St., 3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02111
1-617-290-1118 (m)
geoff.lansberry (skype)
http://www.kuvee.com



On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Mark Greer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:18:34PM -0500, Geoff Lansberry wrote:
>> From: Jaret Cantu <[email protected]>
>>
>> Repeated polling attempts cause a NULL dereference error to occur.
>> This is because the state of the trf7970a is currently reading but
>> another request has been made to send a command before it has finished.
>>
>> The solution is to properly kill the waiting reading (workqueue)
>> before failing on the send.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geoff Lansberry <[email protected]>
>> ---
>
> You've still provided virtually no information on the actual problem(s)
> nor justified why you think this is the best solution. You're adding
> code to a section of code that should _never_ be executed so the only
> reasonable things I can infer is that there are, at least, two problems:
>
> 1) There is a bug causing execution to get into this block of code.
>
> 2) Once in this block of code, there is another bug.
>
> You seem to be attempting to fix 2) and completely ignoring 1).
> 1) is the first bug that needs to be root-caused and fixed.
>
> Also, what exactly is the "NULL dereference error" you mention?
> Is this the neard crash you talked about in another thread or is
> this a kernel crash? If it is the kernel crash, please post the
> relevant information. If this is the neard crash - which seems
> unlikely - then how can changing a section of kernel code that
> shouldn't be executed in the first place fix that?
>
> Mark
> --

2016-12-24 17:24:45

by Mark Greer

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] nfc: trf7970a: Prevent repeated polling from crashing the kernel

On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 11:17:18AM -0500, Geoff Lansberry wrote:
> Mark - I'm sorry, but I did not write this code, and therefore was not
> able to accurately describe it. It is fixing a different issue, not
> the neard segfault that we are still chasing. Last week Jaret Cantu
> sent a separate email explaining the purpose of the code, which had
> you copied, did you see that?

Hm, no, I didn't. I received an email from Justin Bronder but not from
Jaret Cantu. Justin's email did help but is still pretty high-level.
We need a clear understanding as to what is happening in the digital
layer and the driver to know how execution is getting into a block of
error handling code that should never be executed. Once we understand
that we can start thinking about what the best fix is.

> Does it explain why it was done to
> your satisfaction? I've asked him to join in on the effort to push
> the change upstream, however he will not be available until the new
> year.

I expect that it would help if he joins. After the holidays is fine -
I think many people are taking it easy for the next week or so, anyway.

> I know you did suggest that we split off that change from the others,
> and if now is the time to do that, let me know. If you don't have
> the email from Jaret, also please let me know and I will forward it to
> you.

I think it would help you if you split it off because the first two patches
have a good chance of being accepted but this one doesn't (yet). If you
separate the them, it will make it easier for Samuel to take the first two
(or he may take the first two anyway but its always good to make it as
easy maintainers as you can).

Mark
--

2016-12-27 14:20:16

by Geoff Lansberry

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] nfc: trf7970a: Prevent repeated polling from crashing the kernel

Mark - I will split this off soon.

In the meantime - here is some more info about how we use it.

We do use NFC structures. I did find an interesting clue in that
there are certain bottles that cause neard to segfault, I'm not sure
what is different about them. We write a string, like
"coppola_chardonnay_2015" to the bottles. Come to think of it, I
haven't done anything special to make that an ndef record, just
assumed that it would happen by default, I'll look into this further.
Also, I've been running neard with --plugin nfctype2. Just in case
the problem was happening due to cycling through other tag types. It
didn't seem to make any difference, but I have not gone back to
default.

Geoff
Geoff Lansberry


Engineering Guy
Kuvée, Inc
125 Kingston St., 3rd Floor
Boston, MA 02111
1-617-290-1118 (m)
geoff.lansberry (skype)
http://www.kuvee.com



On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Mark Greer <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 11:17:18AM -0500, Geoff Lansberry wrote:
>> Mark - I'm sorry, but I did not write this code, and therefore was not
>> able to accurately describe it. It is fixing a different issue, not
>> the neard segfault that we are still chasing. Last week Jaret Cantu
>> sent a separate email explaining the purpose of the code, which had
>> you copied, did you see that?
>
> Hm, no, I didn't. I received an email from Justin Bronder but not from
> Jaret Cantu. Justin's email did help but is still pretty high-level.
> We need a clear understanding as to what is happening in the digital
> layer and the driver to know how execution is getting into a block of
> error handling code that should never be executed. Once we understand
> that we can start thinking about what the best fix is.
>
>> Does it explain why it was done to
>> your satisfaction? I've asked him to join in on the effort to push
>> the change upstream, however he will not be available until the new
>> year.
>
> I expect that it would help if he joins. After the holidays is fine -
> I think many people are taking it easy for the next week or so, anyway.
>
>> I know you did suggest that we split off that change from the others,
>> and if now is the time to do that, let me know. If you don't have
>> the email from Jaret, also please let me know and I will forward it to
>> you.
>
> I think it would help you if you split it off because the first two patches
> have a good chance of being accepted but this one doesn't (yet). If you
> separate the them, it will make it easier for Samuel to take the first two
> (or he may take the first two anyway but its always good to make it as
> easy maintainers as you can).
>
> Mark
> --

2017-04-05 09:07:20

by Samuel Ortiz

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] NFC: trf7970a: add device tree option for 27MHz clock

Hi Geoff,

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:18:32PM -0500, Geoff Lansberry wrote:
> The TRF7970A has configuration options to support hardware designs
> which use a 27.12MHz clock. This commit adds a device tree option
> 'clock-frequency' to support configuring the this chip for default
> 13.56MHz clock or the optional 27.12MHz clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geoff Lansberry <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/nfc/trf7970a.txt | 2 +
> drivers/nfc/trf7970a.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Patches #1 and #2 applied to nfc-next. I'll wait for you to rework #3
before merging.

Cheers,
Samuel.