Same as ip_gre, geneve and vxlan, use key->tos as tos value.
Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <[email protected]>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
index ef99d59..5f4aff5 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
@@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ int ip6_tnl_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, __u8 dsfield,
fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_IPIP;
fl6.daddr = key->u.ipv6.dst;
fl6.flowlabel = key->label;
- dsfield = ip6_tclass(key->label);
+ dsfield = key->tos;
} else {
if (!(t->parms.flags & IP6_TNL_F_IGN_ENCAP_LIMIT))
encap_limit = t->parms.encap_limit;
@@ -1320,7 +1320,7 @@ int ip6_tnl_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, __u8 dsfield,
fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_IPV6;
fl6.daddr = key->u.ipv6.dst;
fl6.flowlabel = key->label;
- dsfield = ip6_tclass(key->label);
+ dsfield = key->tos;
} else {
offset = ip6_tnl_parse_tlv_enc_lim(skb, skb_network_header(skb));
/* ip6_tnl_parse_tlv_enc_lim() might have reallocated skb->head */
--
1.8.3.1
On 06/13/2017 09:55 AM, Haishuang Yan wrote:
> Same as ip_gre, geneve and vxlan, use key->tos as tos value.
>
Please also add Fixes tag and Cc original authors.
Fixes: 0e9a709560db ("ip6_tunnel, ip6_gre: fix setting of DSCP on encapsulated packets")
> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
> index ef99d59..5f4aff5 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
> @@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ int ip6_tnl_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, __u8 dsfield,
> fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_IPIP;
> fl6.daddr = key->u.ipv6.dst;
> fl6.flowlabel = key->label;
> - dsfield = ip6_tclass(key->label);
> + dsfield = key->tos;
Not exactly the same as vxlan / geneve. They do use key->tos
indeed, but they also set fl6.flowlabel differently:
[...]
prio = info->key.tos;
[...]
fl6->flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(RT_TOS(prio),
info->key.label);
[...]
But looks like the latter is done later in ip6_tnl_xmit() eventually
before the route lookup as per 5f733ee68f9a ("ip6_tunnel: fix traffic
class routing for tunnels") fix. However, you still might want to
mask key->tos with RT_TOS().
> } else {
> if (!(t->parms.flags & IP6_TNL_F_IGN_ENCAP_LIMIT))
> encap_limit = t->parms.encap_limit;
> @@ -1320,7 +1320,7 @@ int ip6_tnl_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, __u8 dsfield,
> fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_IPV6;
> fl6.daddr = key->u.ipv6.dst;
> fl6.flowlabel = key->label;
> - dsfield = ip6_tclass(key->label);
> + dsfield = key->tos;
> } else {
> offset = ip6_tnl_parse_tlv_enc_lim(skb, skb_network_header(skb));
> /* ip6_tnl_parse_tlv_enc_lim() might have reallocated skb->head */
>
On 06/13/2017 03:31 PM, 严海双 wrote:
>> On 13 Jun 2017, at 5:57 PM, Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> wrote:
>> On 06/13/2017 09:55 AM, Haishuang Yan wrote:
>>> Same as ip_gre, geneve and vxlan, use key->tos as tos value.
>>
>> Please also add Fixes tag and Cc original authors.
>>
>> Fixes: 0e9a709560db ("ip6_tunnel, ip6_gre: fix setting of DSCP on encapsulated packets”)
>
> Ok, I will add it, thanks
>
>>> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
>>> index ef99d59..5f4aff5 100644
>>> --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
>>> +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
>>> @@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ int ip6_tnl_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev, __u8 dsfield,
>>> fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_IPIP;
>>> fl6.daddr = key->u.ipv6.dst;
>>> fl6.flowlabel = key->label;
>>> - dsfield = ip6_tclass(key->label);
>>> + dsfield = key->tos;
>>
>> Not exactly the same as vxlan / geneve. They do use key->tos
>> indeed, but they also set fl6.flowlabel differently:
>>
>> [...]
>> prio = info->key.tos;
>> [...]
>> fl6->flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(RT_TOS(prio),
>> info->key.label);
>> [...]
>>
>> But looks like the latter is done later in ip6_tnl_xmit() eventually
>> before the route lookup as per 5f733ee68f9a ("ip6_tunnel: fix traffic
>> class routing for tunnels") fix. However, you still might want to
>> mask key->tos with RT_TOS().
>
> Do you mean this way?
This one from my last comment: dsfield = RT_TOS(key->tos)