2017-08-16 07:50:14

by Hui Zhu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] zsmalloc: zs_page_isolate: skip unnecessary loops but not return false if zspage is not inuse

Like [1], zs_page_isolate meet the same problem if zspage is not inuse.

After [2], zs_page_migrate can support empty zspage now.

Make this patch to let zs_page_isolate skip unnecessary loops but not
return false if zspage is not inuse.

[1] zsmalloc-zs_page_migrate-skip-unnecessary-loops-but-not-return-ebusy-if-zspage-is-not-inuse-fix.patch
[2] zsmalloc-zs_page_migrate-schedule-free_work-if-zspage-is-ZS_EMPTY.patch

Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <[email protected]>
---
mm/zsmalloc.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index fb99953..8560c93 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -1927,11 +1927,6 @@ bool zs_page_isolate(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
class = pool->size_class[class_idx];

spin_lock(&class->lock);
- if (get_zspage_inuse(zspage) == 0) {
- spin_unlock(&class->lock);
- return false;
- }
-
/* zspage is isolated for object migration */
if (list_empty(&zspage->list) && !is_zspage_isolated(zspage)) {
spin_unlock(&class->lock);
--
1.9.1


2017-08-17 05:30:52

by Minchan Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: zs_page_isolate: skip unnecessary loops but not return false if zspage is not inuse

On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 03:49:54PM +0800, Hui Zhu wrote:
> Like [1], zs_page_isolate meet the same problem if zspage is not inuse.
>
> After [2], zs_page_migrate can support empty zspage now.
>
> Make this patch to let zs_page_isolate skip unnecessary loops but not
> return false if zspage is not inuse.
>
> [1] zsmalloc-zs_page_migrate-skip-unnecessary-loops-but-not-return-ebusy-if-zspage-is-not-inuse-fix.patch
> [2] zsmalloc-zs_page_migrate-schedule-free_work-if-zspage-is-ZS_EMPTY.patch
>
> Signed-off-by: Hui Zhu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>

Andrew,
Could you fold this to zsmalloc-zs_page_migrate-skip-unnecessary-loops-but-not-return-ebusy-if-zspage-is-not-inuse?

Thanks!