2017-08-27 20:13:57

by Himanshu Jha

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove memset before memcpy

calling memcpy immediately after memset with the same region of memory
makes memset redundant.

Build successfully.

Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c | 1 -
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 2 --
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c | 2 --
3 files changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c
index e0793f8..d815a69 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_ioctl_set.c
@@ -127,7 +127,6 @@ u8 rtw_do_join(struct adapter *padapter)

pibss = padapter->registrypriv.dev_network.MacAddress;

- memset(&pdev_network->Ssid, 0, sizeof(struct ndis_802_11_ssid));
memcpy(&pdev_network->Ssid, &pmlmepriv->assoc_ssid, sizeof(struct ndis_802_11_ssid));

rtw_update_registrypriv_dev_network(padapter);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
index 9f44dd0..6b77820 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
@@ -922,7 +922,6 @@ void rtw_surveydone_event_callback(struct adapter *adapter, u8 *pbuf)

RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_mlme_c_, _drv_err_, ("switching to adhoc master\n"));

- memset(&pdev_network->Ssid, 0, sizeof(struct ndis_802_11_ssid));
memcpy(&pdev_network->Ssid, &pmlmepriv->assoc_ssid, sizeof(struct ndis_802_11_ssid));

rtw_update_registrypriv_dev_network(adapter);
@@ -1774,7 +1773,6 @@ void rtw_stadel_event_callback(struct adapter *adapter, u8 *pbuf)

memcpy(pdev_network, &tgt_network->network, get_wlan_bssid_ex_sz(&tgt_network->network));

- memset(&pdev_network->Ssid, 0, sizeof(struct ndis_802_11_ssid));
memcpy(&pdev_network->Ssid, &pmlmepriv->assoc_ssid, sizeof(struct ndis_802_11_ssid));

rtw_update_registrypriv_dev_network(adapter);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
index 46315d1..3e29df0 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/os_dep/mlme_linux.c
@@ -91,8 +91,6 @@ void rtw_reset_securitypriv(struct adapter *adapter)
/* Backup the btkip_countermeasure information. */
/* When the countermeasure is trigger, the driver have to disconnect with AP for 60 seconds. */

- memset(&backupPMKIDList[ 0 ], 0x00, sizeof(RT_PMKID_LIST) * NUM_PMKID_CACHE);
-
memcpy(&backupPMKIDList[ 0 ], &adapter->securitypriv.PMKIDList[ 0 ], sizeof(RT_PMKID_LIST) * NUM_PMKID_CACHE);
backupPMKIDIndex = adapter->securitypriv.PMKIDIndex;
backupTKIPCountermeasure = adapter->securitypriv.btkip_countermeasure;
--
2.7.4


2017-08-28 06:19:34

by Dan Carpenter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove memset before memcpy

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 01:43:31AM +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote:
> calling memcpy immediately after memset with the same region of memory
> makes memset redundant.
>
> Build successfully.
>

Thanks for the patch, it looks good. You don't need to say that it
builds successfully, because we already assume that's true.

> Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <[email protected]>
> ---

Sometimes I put a comment here under the cut off line if I want people
to know that I haven't tested a patch.

Anyway, don't resend the patch. It's fine as-is (unless Greg
complains) but it's just for future reference.

regards,
dan carpenter

2017-08-28 07:18:37

by Himanshu Jha

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove memset before memcpy

On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 09:19:06AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 01:43:31AM +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote:
> > calling memcpy immediately after memset with the same region of memory
> > makes memset redundant.
> >
> > Build successfully.
> >
>
> Thanks for the patch, it looks good. You don't need to say that it
> builds successfully, because we already assume that's true.
>
> > Signed-off-by: Himanshu Jha <[email protected]>
> > ---
>
> Sometimes I put a comment here under the cut off line if I want people
> to know that I haven't tested a patch.
>
> Anyway, don't resend the patch. It's fine as-is (unless Greg
> complains) but it's just for future reference.

Thanks for the feedback and i will keep that in mind for future patches.
Himanshu Jha
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>