2001-04-19 23:35:11

by D.W.Howells

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] generic rw_semaphores, compile warnings patch

This patch (made against linux-2.4.4-pre4) gets rid of some warnings obtained
when using the generic rwsem implementation.

David


Attachments:
rwsem-cw.diff (1.34 kB)
rwsem compile warnings patch

2001-04-19 23:45:22

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic rw_semaphores, compile warnings patch


D.W.Howells writes:
> This patch (made against linux-2.4.4-pre4) gets rid of some warnings obtained
> when using the generic rwsem implementation.

Have a look at pre5, this is already fixed.

Later,
David S. Miller
[email protected]

2001-04-20 07:50:55

by David Howells

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic rw_semaphores, compile warnings patch

David S. Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> D.W.Howells writes:
> > This patch (made against linux-2.4.4-pre4) gets rid of some warnings obtained
> > when using the generic rwsem implementation.
>
> Have a look at pre5, this is already fixed.

Not entirely so...

There's also a missing "struct rw_semaphore;" declaration in linux/rwsem.h. It
needs to go in the gap below "#include <linux/wait.h>". Otherwise the
declarations for the contention handling functions will give warnings about
the struct being declared in the parameter list.

David

2001-04-20 07:58:15

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic rw_semaphores, compile warnings patch


David Howells writes:
> There's also a missing "struct rw_semaphore;" declaration in linux/rwsem.h. It
> needs to go in the gap below "#include <linux/wait.h>". Otherwise the
> declarations for the contention handling functions will give warnings about
> the struct being declared in the parameter list.

Indeed, I didn't see this in my setup on sparc64 for some reason.

Later,
David S. Miller
[email protected]

2001-04-20 12:11:25

by Ivan Kokshaysky

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic rw_semaphores, compile warnings patch

On Fri, Apr 20, 2001 at 08:50:38AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> There's also a missing "struct rw_semaphore;" declaration in linux/rwsem.h. It
> needs to go in the gap below "#include <linux/wait.h>". Otherwise the
> declarations for the contention handling functions will give warnings about
> the struct being declared in the parameter list.

Also on alpha __u16 is undeclared in rwsem.c, and old rwsem code wasn't
cleaned up properly.

Ivan.

--- 2.4.4p5/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h Fri Apr 20 14:06:50 2001
+++ linux/include/linux/rwsem-spinlock.h Fri Apr 20 15:37:28 2001
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@

#ifdef __KERNEL__

+#include <linux/types.h>
+
/*
* the semaphore definition
*/
--- 2.4.4p5/include/asm-alpha/semaphore.h Fri Apr 20 13:53:28 2001
+++ linux/include/asm-alpha/semaphore.h Fri Apr 20 15:37:28 2001
@@ -225,5 +225,3 @@ extern inline void up(struct semaphore *
#endif

#endif
-
-#endif
--- 2.4.4p5/arch/alpha/kernel/alpha_ksyms.c Fri Apr 20 13:52:56 2001
+++ linux/arch/alpha/kernel/alpha_ksyms.c Fri Apr 20 14:01:36 2001
@@ -173,9 +173,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(down);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_interruptible);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_trylock);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(up);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_read_failed);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_write_failed);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(__rwsem_wake);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_read);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(down_write);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(up_read);