From: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
Matthew found a roughly 40% tcp throughput regression with commit
c67df11f(vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array) as discussed
in the following thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg187936.html
v4:
- fix zero iov iterator count in tap/tap_do_read()(Jason)
- don't put tun in case of EBADFD(Jason)
- Replace msg->msg_control with new 'skb' when calling tun/tap_do_read()
v3:
- move freeing skb from vhost to tun/tap recvmsg() to not
confuse the callers.
v2:
- add Matthew as the reporter, thanks matthew.
- moving zero headcount check ahead instead of defer consuming skb
due to jason and mst's comment.
- add freeing skb in favor of recvmsg() fails.
Wei Xu (3):
vhost: fix skb leak in handle_rx()
tun: free skb in early errors
tap: free skb if flags error
drivers/net/tap.c | 14 ++++++++++----
drivers/net/tun.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/vhost/net.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
--
1.8.3.1
From: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
tun_recvmsg() supports accepting skb by msg_control after
commit ac77cfd4258f ("tun: support receiving skb through msg_control"),
the skb if presented should be freed no matter how far it can go
along, otherwise it would be leaked.
This patch fixes several missed cases.
Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Matthew Rosato <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/tun.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index 9574900..4f4a842 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -1952,8 +1952,11 @@ static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
tun_debug(KERN_INFO, tun, "tun_do_read\n");
- if (!iov_iter_count(to))
+ if (!iov_iter_count(to)) {
+ if (skb)
+ kfree_skb(skb);
return 0;
+ }
if (!skb) {
/* Read frames from ring */
@@ -2069,22 +2072,24 @@ static int tun_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len,
{
struct tun_file *tfile = container_of(sock, struct tun_file, socket);
struct tun_struct *tun = tun_get(tfile);
+ struct sk_buff *skb = m->msg_control;
int ret;
- if (!tun)
- return -EBADFD;
+ if (!tun) {
+ ret = -EBADFD;
+ goto out_free_skb;
+ }
if (flags & ~(MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_TRUNC|MSG_ERRQUEUE)) {
ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
+ goto out_put_tun;
}
if (flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE) {
ret = sock_recv_errqueue(sock->sk, m, total_len,
SOL_PACKET, TUN_TX_TIMESTAMP);
goto out;
}
- ret = tun_do_read(tun, tfile, &m->msg_iter, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
- m->msg_control);
+ ret = tun_do_read(tun, tfile, &m->msg_iter, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, skb);
if (ret > (ssize_t)total_len) {
m->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
ret = flags & MSG_TRUNC ? ret : total_len;
@@ -2092,6 +2097,13 @@ static int tun_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len,
out:
tun_put(tun);
return ret;
+
+out_put_tun:
+ tun_put(tun);
+out_free_skb:
+ if (skb)
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ return ret;
}
static int tun_peek_len(struct socket *sock)
--
1.8.3.1
From: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
tap_recvmsg() supports accepting skb by msg_control after
commit 3b4ba04acca8 ("tap: support receiving skb from msg_control"),
the skb if presented should be freed within the function, otherwise
it would be leaked.
Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Matthew Rosato <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/tap.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c
index e9489b8..0a886fda 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
@@ -829,8 +829,11 @@ static ssize_t tap_do_read(struct tap_queue *q,
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
ssize_t ret = 0;
- if (!iov_iter_count(to))
+ if (!iov_iter_count(to)) {
+ if (skb)
+ kfree_skb(skb);
return 0;
+ }
if (skb)
goto put;
@@ -1154,11 +1157,14 @@ static int tap_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
size_t total_len, int flags)
{
struct tap_queue *q = container_of(sock, struct tap_queue, sock);
+ struct sk_buff *skb = m->msg_control;
int ret;
- if (flags & ~(MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_TRUNC))
+ if (flags & ~(MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_TRUNC)) {
+ if (skb)
+ kfree_skb(skb);
return -EINVAL;
- ret = tap_do_read(q, &m->msg_iter, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
- m->msg_control);
+ }
+ ret = tap_do_read(q, &m->msg_iter, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, skb);
if (ret > total_len) {
m->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
ret = flags & MSG_TRUNC ? ret : total_len;
--
1.8.3.1
From: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
Matthew found a roughly 40% tcp throughput regression with commit
c67df11f(vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array) as discussed
in the following thread:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg187936.html
Eventually we figured out that it was a skb leak in handle_rx()
when sending packets to the VM. This usually happens when a guest
can not drain out vq as fast as vhost fills in, afterwards it sets
off the traffic jam and leaks skb(s) which occurs as no headcount
to send on the vq from vhost side.
This can be avoided by making sure we have got enough headcount
before actually consuming a skb from the batched rx array while
transmitting, which is simply done by moving checking the zero
headcount a bit ahead.
Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Matthew Rosato <[email protected]>
---
drivers/vhost/net.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
index 8d626d7..c7bdeb6 100644
--- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
+++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
@@ -778,16 +778,6 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
/* On error, stop handling until the next kick. */
if (unlikely(headcount < 0))
goto out;
- if (nvq->rx_array)
- msg.msg_control = vhost_net_buf_consume(&nvq->rxq);
- /* On overrun, truncate and discard */
- if (unlikely(headcount > UIO_MAXIOV)) {
- iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, READ, vq->iov, 1, 1);
- err = sock->ops->recvmsg(sock, &msg,
- 1, MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_TRUNC);
- pr_debug("Discarded rx packet: len %zd\n", sock_len);
- continue;
- }
/* OK, now we need to know about added descriptors. */
if (!headcount) {
if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
@@ -800,6 +790,16 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
* they refilled. */
goto out;
}
+ if (nvq->rx_array)
+ msg.msg_control = vhost_net_buf_consume(&nvq->rxq);
+ /* On overrun, truncate and discard */
+ if (unlikely(headcount > UIO_MAXIOV)) {
+ iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, READ, vq->iov, 1, 1);
+ err = sock->ops->recvmsg(sock, &msg,
+ 1, MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_TRUNC);
+ pr_debug("Discarded rx packet: len %zd\n", sock_len);
+ continue;
+ }
/* We don't need to be notified again. */
iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, READ, vq->iov, in, vhost_len);
fixup = msg.msg_iter;
--
1.8.3.1
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:10:35AM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
>
> Matthew found a roughly 40% tcp throughput regression with commit
> c67df11f(vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array) as discussed
> in the following thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg187936.html
Series
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> v4:
> - fix zero iov iterator count in tap/tap_do_read()(Jason)
> - don't put tun in case of EBADFD(Jason)
> - Replace msg->msg_control with new 'skb' when calling tun/tap_do_read()
>
> v3:
> - move freeing skb from vhost to tun/tap recvmsg() to not
> confuse the callers.
>
> v2:
> - add Matthew as the reporter, thanks matthew.
> - moving zero headcount check ahead instead of defer consuming skb
> due to jason and mst's comment.
> - add freeing skb in favor of recvmsg() fails.
>
> Wei Xu (3):
> vhost: fix skb leak in handle_rx()
> tun: free skb in early errors
> tap: free skb if flags error
>
> drivers/net/tap.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> drivers/net/tun.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> drivers/vhost/net.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:10:36AM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
>
> Matthew found a roughly 40% tcp throughput regression with commit
> c67df11f(vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array) as discussed
> in the following thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg187936.html
>
> Eventually we figured out that it was a skb leak in handle_rx()
> when sending packets to the VM. This usually happens when a guest
> can not drain out vq as fast as vhost fills in, afterwards it sets
> off the traffic jam and leaks skb(s) which occurs as no headcount
> to send on the vq from vhost side.
>
> This can be avoided by making sure we have got enough headcount
> before actually consuming a skb from the batched rx array while
> transmitting, which is simply done by moving checking the zero
> headcount a bit ahead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Matthew Rosato <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/net.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index 8d626d7..c7bdeb6 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -778,16 +778,6 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
> /* On error, stop handling until the next kick. */
> if (unlikely(headcount < 0))
> goto out;
> - if (nvq->rx_array)
> - msg.msg_control = vhost_net_buf_consume(&nvq->rxq);
> - /* On overrun, truncate and discard */
> - if (unlikely(headcount > UIO_MAXIOV)) {
> - iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, READ, vq->iov, 1, 1);
> - err = sock->ops->recvmsg(sock, &msg,
> - 1, MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_TRUNC);
> - pr_debug("Discarded rx packet: len %zd\n", sock_len);
> - continue;
> - }
> /* OK, now we need to know about added descriptors. */
> if (!headcount) {
> if (unlikely(vhost_enable_notify(&net->dev, vq))) {
> @@ -800,6 +790,16 @@ static void handle_rx(struct vhost_net *net)
> * they refilled. */
> goto out;
> }
> + if (nvq->rx_array)
> + msg.msg_control = vhost_net_buf_consume(&nvq->rxq);
> + /* On overrun, truncate and discard */
> + if (unlikely(headcount > UIO_MAXIOV)) {
> + iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, READ, vq->iov, 1, 1);
> + err = sock->ops->recvmsg(sock, &msg,
> + 1, MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_TRUNC);
> + pr_debug("Discarded rx packet: len %zd\n", sock_len);
> + continue;
> + }
> /* We don't need to be notified again. */
> iov_iter_init(&msg.msg_iter, READ, vq->iov, in, vhost_len);
> fixup = msg.msg_iter;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:10:37AM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
>
> tun_recvmsg() supports accepting skb by msg_control after
> commit ac77cfd4258f ("tun: support receiving skb through msg_control"),
> the skb if presented should be freed no matter how far it can go
> along, otherwise it would be leaked.
>
> This patch fixes several missed cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Matthew Rosato <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 9574900..4f4a842 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -1952,8 +1952,11 @@ static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>
> tun_debug(KERN_INFO, tun, "tun_do_read\n");
>
> - if (!iov_iter_count(to))
> + if (!iov_iter_count(to)) {
> + if (skb)
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> return 0;
> + }
>
> if (!skb) {
> /* Read frames from ring */
> @@ -2069,22 +2072,24 @@ static int tun_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len,
> {
> struct tun_file *tfile = container_of(sock, struct tun_file, socket);
> struct tun_struct *tun = tun_get(tfile);
> + struct sk_buff *skb = m->msg_control;
> int ret;
>
> - if (!tun)
> - return -EBADFD;
> + if (!tun) {
> + ret = -EBADFD;
> + goto out_free_skb;
> + }
>
> if (flags & ~(MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_TRUNC|MSG_ERRQUEUE)) {
> ret = -EINVAL;
> - goto out;
> + goto out_put_tun;
> }
> if (flags & MSG_ERRQUEUE) {
> ret = sock_recv_errqueue(sock->sk, m, total_len,
> SOL_PACKET, TUN_TX_TIMESTAMP);
> goto out;
> }
> - ret = tun_do_read(tun, tfile, &m->msg_iter, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
> - m->msg_control);
> + ret = tun_do_read(tun, tfile, &m->msg_iter, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, skb);
> if (ret > (ssize_t)total_len) {
> m->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
> ret = flags & MSG_TRUNC ? ret : total_len;
> @@ -2092,6 +2097,13 @@ static int tun_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len,
> out:
> tun_put(tun);
> return ret;
> +
> +out_put_tun:
> + tun_put(tun);
> +out_free_skb:
> + if (skb)
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static int tun_peek_len(struct socket *sock)
> --
> 1.8.3.1
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:10:38AM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
>
> tap_recvmsg() supports accepting skb by msg_control after
> commit 3b4ba04acca8 ("tap: support receiving skb from msg_control"),
> the skb if presented should be freed within the function, otherwise
> it would be leaked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Matthew Rosato <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/tap.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tap.c b/drivers/net/tap.c
> index e9489b8..0a886fda 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tap.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tap.c
> @@ -829,8 +829,11 @@ static ssize_t tap_do_read(struct tap_queue *q,
> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> ssize_t ret = 0;
>
> - if (!iov_iter_count(to))
> + if (!iov_iter_count(to)) {
> + if (skb)
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> return 0;
> + }
>
> if (skb)
> goto put;
> @@ -1154,11 +1157,14 @@ static int tap_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m,
> size_t total_len, int flags)
> {
> struct tap_queue *q = container_of(sock, struct tap_queue, sock);
> + struct sk_buff *skb = m->msg_control;
> int ret;
> - if (flags & ~(MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_TRUNC))
> + if (flags & ~(MSG_DONTWAIT|MSG_TRUNC)) {
> + if (skb)
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> return -EINVAL;
> - ret = tap_do_read(q, &m->msg_iter, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT,
> - m->msg_control);
> + }
> + ret = tap_do_read(q, &m->msg_iter, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT, skb);
> if (ret > total_len) {
> m->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
> ret = flags & MSG_TRUNC ? ret : total_len;
> --
> 1.8.3.1
On 12/01/2017 09:47 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:10:35AM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
>> From: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
>>
>> Matthew found a roughly 40% tcp throughput regression with commit
>> c67df11f(vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array) as discussed
>> in the following thread:
>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg187936.html
>
> Series
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
Tested this series on a z13 (s390x) on top of net-next using 4GB/4vcpu
guests. Verified that both the reported TCP throughput regression and
memory leak are resolved.
net-next: 19.83 Gb/s
net-next+: 35.02 Gb/s
Thanks all!
Matt
>
>
>> v4:
>> - fix zero iov iterator count in tap/tap_do_read()(Jason)
>> - don't put tun in case of EBADFD(Jason)
>> - Replace msg->msg_control with new 'skb' when calling tun/tap_do_read()
>>
>> v3:
>> - move freeing skb from vhost to tun/tap recvmsg() to not
>> confuse the callers.
>>
>> v2:
>> - add Matthew as the reporter, thanks matthew.
>> - moving zero headcount check ahead instead of defer consuming skb
>> due to jason and mst's comment.
>> - add freeing skb in favor of recvmsg() fails.
>>
>> Wei Xu (3):
>> vhost: fix skb leak in handle_rx()
>> tun: free skb in early errors
>> tap: free skb if flags error
>>
>> drivers/net/tap.c | 14 ++++++++++----
>> drivers/net/tun.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
>> drivers/vhost/net.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
>> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>
On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 09:54:02AM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> On 12/01/2017 09:47 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 05:10:35AM -0500, [email protected] wrote:
> >> From: Wei Xu <[email protected]>
> >>
> >> Matthew found a roughly 40% tcp throughput regression with commit
> >> c67df11f(vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array) as discussed
> >> in the following thread:
> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg187936.html
> >
> > Series
> >
> > Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
>
> Tested this series on a z13 (s390x) on top of net-next using 4GB/4vcpu
> guests. Verified that both the reported TCP throughput regression and
> memory leak are resolved.
>
> net-next: 19.83 Gb/s
> net-next+: 35.02 Gb/s
>
> Thanks all!
>
> Matt
So we can also add
Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <[email protected]>
Dave, pls take this through the net tree as most changes are
in tun/tap.
Thanks!
> >
> >
> >> v4:
> >> - fix zero iov iterator count in tap/tap_do_read()(Jason)
> >> - don't put tun in case of EBADFD(Jason)
> >> - Replace msg->msg_control with new 'skb' when calling tun/tap_do_read()
> >>
> >> v3:
> >> - move freeing skb from vhost to tun/tap recvmsg() to not
> >> confuse the callers.
> >>
> >> v2:
> >> - add Matthew as the reporter, thanks matthew.
> >> - moving zero headcount check ahead instead of defer consuming skb
> >> due to jason and mst's comment.
> >> - add freeing skb in favor of recvmsg() fails.
> >>
> >> Wei Xu (3):
> >> vhost: fix skb leak in handle_rx()
> >> tun: free skb in early errors
> >> tap: free skb if flags error
> >>
> >> drivers/net/tap.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> >> drivers/net/tun.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
> >> drivers/vhost/net.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
> >> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 1.8.3.1
> >
From: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 05:10:35 -0500
> Matthew found a roughly 40% tcp throughput regression with commit
> c67df11f(vhost_net: try batch dequing from skb array) as discussed
> in the following thread:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg187936.html
Series applied and queued up for -stable.