2018-03-29 06:38:40

by David Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v1] hwmon, via-cputem: support new centaur CPUs

Newer centaur CPUs(Family == 7) also support this cpu temperature sensor.

Signed-off-by: David Wang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
index 07a0cb0..2f5bd50 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
@@ -136,6 +136,11 @@ static int via_cputemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
data->id = pdev->id;
data->name = "via_cputemp";

+ if (c->x86 == 7) {
+ data->msr_temp = 0x1423;
+ goto test_access;
+ }
+
switch (c->x86_model) {
case 0xA:
/* C7 A */
@@ -152,6 +157,7 @@ static int via_cputemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENODEV;
}

+test_access:
/* test if we can access the TEMPERATURE MSR */
err = rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(data->id, data->msr_temp, &eax, &edx);
if (err) {
@@ -283,6 +289,7 @@ static int via_cputemp_down_prep(unsigned int cpu)
{ X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR, 6, 0xa, }, /* C7 A */
{ X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR, 6, 0xd, }, /* C7 D */
{ X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR, 6, 0xf, }, /* Nano */
+ { X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR, 7, X86_MODEL_ANY, },
{}
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, cputemp_ids);
--
1.9.1



2018-03-29 13:45:02

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] hwmon, via-cputem: support new centaur CPUs

On 03/28/2018 11:36 PM, David Wang wrote:
> Newer centaur CPUs(Family == 7) also support this cpu temperature sensor.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Wang <[email protected]>
> ---

FWIW, this would be v2, not v1, and a changelog would be appreciated.

> drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
> index 07a0cb0..2f5bd50 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/via-cputemp.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,11 @@ static int via_cputemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> data->id = pdev->id;
> data->name = "via_cputemp";
>
> + if (c->x86 == 7) {
> + data->msr_temp = 0x1423;
> + goto test_access;
> + }

Please rework to not require a goto. Something like

if (c->x86 == 7) {
data->msr_temp = 0x1423;
} else switch (c->x86_model) {
...
}

should do.

Thanks,
Guenter

> +
> switch (c->x86_model) {
> case 0xA:
> /* C7 A */
> @@ -152,6 +157,7 @@ static int via_cputemp_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> +test_access:
> /* test if we can access the TEMPERATURE MSR */
> err = rdmsr_safe_on_cpu(data->id, data->msr_temp, &eax, &edx);
> if (err) {
> @@ -283,6 +289,7 @@ static int via_cputemp_down_prep(unsigned int cpu)
> { X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR, 6, 0xa, }, /* C7 A */
> { X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR, 6, 0xd, }, /* C7 D */
> { X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR, 6, 0xf, }, /* Nano */
> + { X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR, 7, X86_MODEL_ANY, },
> {}
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, cputemp_ids);
>