pci_epf_test_write() is never called in atomic context.
The call chain ending up at pci_epf_test_write() is:
[1] pci_epf_test_write() <- pci_epf_test_cmd_handler()
pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() is set as a parameter of INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
in pci_epf_test_probe().
This function is not called in atomic context.
Despite never getting called from atomic context, pci_epf_test_write()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
avoid busy waiting.
This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
index f9308c2..2f0642e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
@@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test)
* wait 1ms inorder for the write to complete. Without this delay L3
* error in observed in the host system.
*/
- mdelay(1);
+ usleep_range(1000, 2000);
kfree(buf);
--
1.9.1
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:04:06PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> pci_epf_test_write() is never called in atomic context.
>
> The call chain ending up at pci_epf_test_write() is:
> [1] pci_epf_test_write() <- pci_epf_test_cmd_handler()
>
> pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() is set as a parameter of INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
> in pci_epf_test_probe().
> This function is not called in atomic context.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context, pci_epf_test_write()
> calls mdelay() to busily wait.
> This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
> avoid busy waiting.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> And I also manually check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
I'd request Kishon's ACK on this.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index f9308c2..2f0642e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test)
> * wait 1ms inorder for the write to complete. Without this delay L3
> * error in observed in the host system.
> */
> - mdelay(1);
> + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>
> kfree(buf);
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
On Friday 04 May 2018 09:59 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:04:06PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>> pci_epf_test_write() is never called in atomic context.
>>
>> The call chain ending up at pci_epf_test_write() is:
>> [1] pci_epf_test_write() <- pci_epf_test_cmd_handler()
>>
>> pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() is set as a parameter of INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
>> in pci_epf_test_probe().
>> This function is not called in atomic context.
>>
>> Despite never getting called from atomic context, pci_epf_test_write()
>> calls mdelay() to busily wait.
>> This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
>> avoid busy waiting.
>>
>> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
>> And I also manually check it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> I'd request Kishon's ACK on this.
sorry, missed this before.
Acked-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks,
> Lorenzo
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>> index f9308c2..2f0642e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
>> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test)
>> * wait 1ms inorder for the write to complete. Without this delay L3
>> * error in observed in the host system.
>> */
>> - mdelay(1);
>> + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>>
>> kfree(buf);
>>
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:04:06PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> pci_epf_test_write() is never called in atomic context.
>
> The call chain ending up at pci_epf_test_write() is:
> [1] pci_epf_test_write() <- pci_epf_test_cmd_handler()
>
> pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() is set as a parameter of INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
> in pci_epf_test_probe().
> This function is not called in atomic context.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context, pci_epf_test_write()
> calls mdelay() to busily wait.
> This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
> avoid busy waiting.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> And I also manually check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to pci/endpoint for v4.18, thanks.
Lorenzo
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index f9308c2..2f0642e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test)
> * wait 1ms inorder for the write to complete. Without this delay L3
> * error in observed in the host system.
> */
> - mdelay(1);
> + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>
> kfree(buf);
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 09:04:06PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> pci_epf_test_write() is never called in atomic context.
>
> The call chain ending up at pci_epf_test_write() is:
> [1] pci_epf_test_write() <- pci_epf_test_cmd_handler()
>
> pci_epf_test_cmd_handler() is set as a parameter of INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
> in pci_epf_test_probe().
> This function is not called in atomic context.
>
> Despite never getting called from atomic context, pci_epf_test_write()
> calls mdelay() to busily wait.
> This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
> avoid busy waiting.
>
> This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
> And I also manually check it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to pci/endpoint for v4.18, thanks.
Lorenzo
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> index f9308c2..2f0642e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
> @@ -237,7 +237,7 @@ static int pci_epf_test_write(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test)
> * wait 1ms inorder for the write to complete. Without this delay L3
> * error in observed in the host system.
> */
> - mdelay(1);
> + usleep_range(1000, 2000);
>
> kfree(buf);
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>