2018-04-11 08:46:20

by Jia-Ju Bai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2 v2] ide: pdc202xx_new: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in detect_pll_input_clock

detect_pll_input_clock() is never called in atomic context.

detect_pll_input_clock() is only called by init_chipset_pdcnew(), which
is set as ".init_chipset" in struct ide_port_info.
This function is not called in atomic context.

Despite never getting called from atomic context, detect_pll_input_clock()
calls mdelay() to busily wait.
This is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range() to
avoid busy waiting.

This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself.
And I also manually check it.

Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai <[email protected]>
---
v2:
* Correct wrong usage of usleep_range() in v1.
Thank Sergei for pointing it out.
---
drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c b/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
index b33646b..6afa66d 100644
--- a/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
+++ b/drivers/ide/pdc202xx_new.c
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static long detect_pll_input_clock(unsigned long dma_base)
outb(scr1 | 0x40, dma_base + 0x03);

/* Let the counter run for 10 ms. */
- mdelay(10);
+ usleep_range(10000, 11000);

end_count = read_counter(dma_base);
end_time = ktime_get();
--
1.9.1