2018-04-28 22:37:45

by Alexey Khoroshilov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] power: supply: ltc2941-battery-gauge: Release device_node in ltc294x_i2c_probe()

There is of_node_get(client->dev.of_node) in ltc294x_i2c_probe(),
but these is no of_node_put() somethere in the driver.

The patch adds one on error and normal paths.

Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).

Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <[email protected]>
---
drivers/power/supply/ltc2941-battery-gauge.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/ltc2941-battery-gauge.c b/drivers/power/supply/ltc2941-battery-gauge.c
index 4f129bb4c972..7854a89b3332 100644
--- a/drivers/power/supply/ltc2941-battery-gauge.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/ltc2941-battery-gauge.c
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static int ltc294x_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&client->dev,
"Could not find lltc,resistor-sense in devicetree\n");
- return ret;
+ goto err_node_put;
}
info->r_sense = r_sense;

@@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static int ltc294x_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&client->dev,
"Could not read status register\n");
- return ret;
+ goto err_node_put;
}
if (status & LTC2941_REG_STATUS_CHIP_ID)
info->id = LTC2941_ID;
@@ -550,19 +550,25 @@ static int ltc294x_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
ret = ltc294x_reset(info, prescaler_exp);
if (ret < 0) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "Communication with chip failed\n");
- return ret;
+ goto err_node_put;
}

info->supply = power_supply_register(&client->dev, &info->supply_desc,
&psy_cfg);
if (IS_ERR(info->supply)) {
dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to register ltc2941\n");
- return PTR_ERR(info->supply);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(info->supply);
+ goto err_node_put;
} else {
schedule_delayed_work(&info->work, LTC294X_WORK_DELAY * HZ);
}

+ of_node_put(np);
return 0;
+
+err_node_put:
+ of_node_put(np);
+ return ret;
}

static void ltc294x_i2c_shutdown(struct i2c_client *client)
--
2.7.4



2018-05-01 12:40:53

by Sebastian Reichel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: ltc2941-battery-gauge: Release device_node in ltc294x_i2c_probe()

Hi,

On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 01:35:55AM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> There is of_node_get(client->dev.of_node) in ltc294x_i2c_probe(),
> but these is no of_node_put() somethere in the driver.
>
> The patch adds one on error and normal paths.
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <[email protected]>

That is ugly. Let's replace of_property_read_u32(np, ...) with
device_property_read_u32(dev, ...) and get rid of np instead.

-- Sebastian

> ---
> drivers/power/supply/ltc2941-battery-gauge.c | 14 ++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/ltc2941-battery-gauge.c b/drivers/power/supply/ltc2941-battery-gauge.c
> index 4f129bb4c972..7854a89b3332 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/ltc2941-battery-gauge.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/ltc2941-battery-gauge.c
> @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static int ltc294x_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&client->dev,
> "Could not find lltc,resistor-sense in devicetree\n");
> - return ret;
> + goto err_node_put;
> }
> info->r_sense = r_sense;
>
> @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static int ltc294x_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&client->dev,
> "Could not read status register\n");
> - return ret;
> + goto err_node_put;
> }
> if (status & LTC2941_REG_STATUS_CHIP_ID)
> info->id = LTC2941_ID;
> @@ -550,19 +550,25 @@ static int ltc294x_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> ret = ltc294x_reset(info, prescaler_exp);
> if (ret < 0) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "Communication with chip failed\n");
> - return ret;
> + goto err_node_put;
> }
>
> info->supply = power_supply_register(&client->dev, &info->supply_desc,
> &psy_cfg);
> if (IS_ERR(info->supply)) {
> dev_err(&client->dev, "failed to register ltc2941\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(info->supply);
> + ret = PTR_ERR(info->supply);
> + goto err_node_put;
> } else {
> schedule_delayed_work(&info->work, LTC294X_WORK_DELAY * HZ);
> }
>
> + of_node_put(np);
> return 0;
> +
> +err_node_put:
> + of_node_put(np);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void ltc294x_i2c_shutdown(struct i2c_client *client)
> --
> 2.7.4
>


Attachments:
(No filename) (2.30 kB)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments

2018-05-08 19:17:44

by Alexey Khoroshilov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: ltc2941-battery-gauge: Release device_node in ltc294x_i2c_probe()


Hi,

On 01.05.2018 15:39, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 01:35:55AM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
>> There is of_node_get(client->dev.of_node) in ltc294x_i2c_probe(),
>> but these is no of_node_put() somethere in the driver.
>>
>> The patch adds one on error and normal paths.
>>
>> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <[email protected]>
>
> That is ugly. Let's replace of_property_read_u32(np, ...) with
> device_property_read_u32(dev, ...) and get rid of np instead.
>

Ok, I will prepare v2.

What is the right way to replace
info->supply_desc.name = np->name;
?

If lifetime of 'client->dev.of_node' = 'np' cannot be less than lifetime
of 'client->dev', should we use just
info->supply_desc.name = client->dev.of_node->name;
?

Thank you,
Alexey

2018-07-06 17:05:48

by Sebastian Reichel

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: ltc2941-battery-gauge: Release device_node in ltc294x_i2c_probe()

Hi,

On Tue, May 08, 2018 at 10:16:31PM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> On 01.05.2018 15:39, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 01:35:55AM +0300, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:
> >> There is of_node_get(client->dev.of_node) in ltc294x_i2c_probe(),
> >> but these is no of_node_put() somethere in the driver.
> >>
> >> The patch adds one on error and normal paths.
> >>
> >> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <[email protected]>
> >
> > That is ugly. Let's replace of_property_read_u32(np, ...) with
> > device_property_read_u32(dev, ...) and get rid of np instead.
>
> Ok, I will prepare v2.
>
> What is the right way to replace
> info->supply_desc.name = np->name;
> ?
>
> If lifetime of 'client->dev.of_node' = 'np' cannot be less than lifetime
> of 'client->dev', should we use just
> info->supply_desc.name = client->dev.of_node->name;
> ?

It looks like I never responsed to this, sorry for the delay.
Your suggestion looks fine.

-- Sebastian


Attachments:
(No filename) (1.05 kB)
signature.asc (849.00 B)
Download all attachments