The sock_flag() check is alreay inside sock_enable_timestamp(), so it is
unnecessary checking it in the caller.
void sock_enable_timestamp(struct sock *sk, int flag)
{
if (!sock_flag(sk, flag)) {
...
}
}
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]>
---
net/compat.c | 6 ++----
net/core/sock.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/compat.c b/net/compat.c
index 7242cce..3b2105f 100644
--- a/net/compat.c
+++ b/net/compat.c
@@ -466,8 +466,7 @@ int compat_sock_get_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct timeval __user *userstamp)
ctv = (struct compat_timeval __user *) userstamp;
err = -ENOENT;
- if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP))
- sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
+ sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
tv = ktime_to_timeval(sk->sk_stamp);
if (tv.tv_sec == -1)
return err;
@@ -494,8 +493,7 @@ int compat_sock_get_timestampns(struct sock *sk, struct timespec __user *usersta
ctv = (struct compat_timespec __user *) userstamp;
err = -ENOENT;
- if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP))
- sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
+ sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
ts = ktime_to_timespec(sk->sk_stamp);
if (ts.tv_sec == -1)
return err;
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index e31233f..3730eb8 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -2900,8 +2900,8 @@ bool lock_sock_fast(struct sock *sk)
int sock_get_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct timeval __user *userstamp)
{
struct timeval tv;
- if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP))
- sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
+
+ sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
tv = ktime_to_timeval(sk->sk_stamp);
if (tv.tv_sec == -1)
return -ENOENT;
@@ -2916,8 +2916,8 @@ int sock_get_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct timeval __user *userstamp)
int sock_get_timestampns(struct sock *sk, struct timespec __user *userstamp)
{
struct timespec ts;
- if (!sock_flag(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP))
- sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
+
+ sock_enable_timestamp(sk, SOCK_TIMESTAMP);
ts = ktime_to_timespec(sk->sk_stamp);
if (ts.tv_sec == -1)
return -ENOENT;
--
1.8.3.1
From: Yafang Shao <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 11:57:02 +0800
> The sock_flag() check is alreay inside sock_enable_timestamp(), so it is
> unnecessary checking it in the caller.
>
> void sock_enable_timestamp(struct sock *sk, int flag)
> {
> if (!sock_flag(sk, flag)) {
> ...
> }
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]>
Applied.