From: Frank Rowand <[email protected]>
Fix a typo in kernel-doc.rst
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst b/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
index 450ac634e92e..6513c16b7e4f 100644
--- a/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
+++ b/Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
@@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ doc: *title*
functions: *[ function ...]*
Include documentation for each *function* in *source*.
- If no *function* if specified, the documentaion for all functions
+ If no *function* if specified, the documentation for all functions
and types in the *source* will be included.
Examples::
--
Frank Rowand <[email protected]>
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 14:04:16 -0800
[email protected] wrote:
> Fix a typo in kernel-doc.rst
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <[email protected]>
Applied, thanks.
jon
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 02:04:16PM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> Include documentation for each *function* in *source*.
> - If no *function* if specified, the documentaion for all functions
> + If no *function* if specified, the documentation for all functions
> and types in the *source* will be included.
Could you fix the if/is mistake while you're at it?
On 2/2/19 12:56 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 02:04:16PM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
>> Include documentation for each *function* in *source*.
>> - If no *function* if specified, the documentaion for all functions
>> + If no *function* if specified, the documentation for all functions
>> and types in the *source* will be included.
>
> Could you fix the if/is mistake while you're at it?
>
Jon,
Since you already accepted the patch, is it easy for you to revert the
patch and apply a v2 with the change Mathew pointed out? If so, I will
do a v2.
-Frank
On Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:29:31 -0800
Frank Rowand <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2/2/19 12:56 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 02:04:16PM -0800, [email protected] wrote:
> >> Include documentation for each *function* in *source*.
> >> - If no *function* if specified, the documentaion for all functions
> >> + If no *function* if specified, the documentation for all functions
> >> and types in the *source* will be included.
> >
> > Could you fix the if/is mistake while you're at it?
> >
>
>
> Jon,
>
> Since you already accepted the patch, is it easy for you to revert the
> patch and apply a v2 with the change Mathew pointed out? If so, I will
> do a v2.
How about you just send another with the second fix? Seems just as easy
in the end...
Thanks,
jon