2019-04-15 14:47:35

by Sumeet Pawnikar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] thermal: intel: int340x: processor_thermal_device: simplify to get driver data

From: "Pawnikar, Sumeet R" <[email protected]>

This simplifies getting the 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly.
Going through platform_device or pci_dev is not required. Also removes
condition check as the private data stored with dev pointer, means
irrespective of enumeration mode, we can use dev_get_drvdata().
This removes the unnecessary step back and forth.

Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <[email protected]>
---
.../int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c | 11 +----------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
index 8e1cf4d..2a7cbaa 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
@@ -81,22 +81,13 @@ enum proc_thermal_emum_mode_type {
struct device_attribute *attr, \
char *buf) \
{ \
- struct pci_dev *pci_dev; \
- struct platform_device *pdev; \
- struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev; \
+ struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
\
if (proc_thermal_emum_mode == PROC_THERMAL_NONE) { \
dev_warn(dev, "Attempted to get power limit before device was initialized!\n"); \
return 0; \
} \
\
- if (proc_thermal_emum_mode == PROC_THERMAL_PLATFORM_DEV) { \
- pdev = to_platform_device(dev); \
- proc_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); \
- } else { \
- pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev); \
- proc_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev); \
- } \
return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n",\
(unsigned long)proc_dev->power_limits[index].suffix * 1000); \
}
--
1.7.9.5


2019-04-15 16:29:02

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: intel: int340x: processor_thermal_device: simplify to get driver data

On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 08:18:30PM +0530, Sumeet Pawnikar wrote:
> From: "Pawnikar, Sumeet R" <[email protected]>
>
> This simplifies getting the 'driver_data' from 'struct device' directly.
> Going through platform_device or pci_dev is not required. Also removes
> condition check as the private data stored with dev pointer, means
> irrespective of enumeration mode, we can use dev_get_drvdata().
> This removes the unnecessary step back and forth.
>

Indeed, good clean up!
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>

> Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c | 11 +----------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> index 8e1cf4d..2a7cbaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> @@ -81,22 +81,13 @@ enum proc_thermal_emum_mode_type {
> struct device_attribute *attr, \
> char *buf) \
> { \
> - struct pci_dev *pci_dev; \
> - struct platform_device *pdev; \
> - struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev; \
> + struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
> \
> if (proc_thermal_emum_mode == PROC_THERMAL_NONE) { \
> dev_warn(dev, "Attempted to get power limit before device was initialized!\n"); \
> return 0; \
> } \
> \
> - if (proc_thermal_emum_mode == PROC_THERMAL_PLATFORM_DEV) { \
> - pdev = to_platform_device(dev); \
> - proc_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); \
> - } else { \
> - pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev); \
> - proc_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev); \
> - } \
> return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n",\
> (unsigned long)proc_dev->power_limits[index].suffix * 1000); \
> }
> --
> 1.7.9.5
>

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


2019-04-22 08:56:45

by Zhang, Rui

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: intel: int340x: processor_thermal_device: simplify to get driver data

On 一, 2019-04-15 at 19:28 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 08:18:30PM +0530, Sumeet Pawnikar wrote:
> >
> > From: "Pawnikar, Sumeet R" <[email protected]>
> >
> > This simplifies getting the 'driver_data' from 'struct device'
> > directly.
> > Going through platform_device or pci_dev is not required. Also
> > removes
> > condition check as the private data stored with dev pointer, means
> > irrespective of enumeration mode, we can use dev_get_drvdata().
> > This removes the unnecessary step back and forth.
> >
> Indeed, good clean up!
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
>
Thanks, patch applied.

-rui
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  .../int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c     |   11 +-------
> > ---
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
> > a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> > b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> > index 8e1cf4d..2a7cbaa 100644
> > ---
> > a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> > +++
> > b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> > @@ -81,22 +81,13 @@ enum proc_thermal_emum_mode_type {
> >   struct device_attribute
> > *attr, \
> >   char *buf) \
> >  { \
> > - struct pci_dev *pci_dev; \
> > - struct platform_device *pdev; \
> > - struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev; \
> > + struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev =
> > dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
> >   \
> >   if (proc_thermal_emum_mode == PROC_THERMAL_NONE) { \
> >   dev_warn(dev, "Attempted to get power limit before
> > device was initialized!\n"); \
> >   return 0; \
> >   } \
> >   \
> > - if (proc_thermal_emum_mode == PROC_THERMAL_PLATFORM_DEV) {
> > \
> > - pdev = to_platform_device(dev); \
> > - proc_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); \
> > - } else { \
> > - pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev); \
> > - proc_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev); \
> > - } \
> >   return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n",\
> >   (unsigned long)proc_dev->power_limits[index].suffix *
> > 1000); \
> >  }
> > -- 
> > 1.7.9.5
> >

2019-04-22 09:04:13

by Zhang, Rui

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: intel: int340x: processor_thermal_device: simplify to get driver data

On 一, 2019-04-22 at 16:46 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> On 一, 2019-04-15 at 19:28 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 08:18:30PM +0530, Sumeet Pawnikar wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > From: "Pawnikar, Sumeet R" <[email protected]>
> > >
just one comment, the author name you used is not consistent with the
name you used for your Signed-off-by 'Pawnikar, Sumeet R <sumeet.r.pawn
[email protected]>', and checkpatch complains about missing Signed-off-by
from patch author.
Please fix your gitconfig and run checkpatch before sending next time.

thanks,
rui

> > > This simplifies getting the 'driver_data' from 'struct device'
> > > directly.
> > > Going through platform_device or pci_dev is not required. Also
> > > removes
> > > condition check as the private data stored with dev pointer,
> > > means
> > > irrespective of enumeration mode, we can use dev_get_drvdata().
> > > This removes the unnecessary step back and forth.
> > >
> > Indeed, good clean up!
> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
> >
> Thanks, patch applied.
>
> -rui
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > >  .../int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c     |   11 +-----
> > > --
> > > ---
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git
> > > a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.
> > > c
> > > b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.
> > > c
> > > index 8e1cf4d..2a7cbaa 100644
> > > ---
> > > a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.
> > > c
> > > +++
> > > b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.
> > > c
> > > @@ -81,22 +81,13 @@ enum proc_thermal_emum_mode_type {
> > >   struct device_attribute
> > > *attr, \
> > >   char *buf) \
> > >  { \
> > > - struct pci_dev *pci_dev; \
> > > - struct platform_device *pdev; \
> > > - struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev; \
> > > + struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev =
> > > dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
> > >   \
> > >   if (proc_thermal_emum_mode == PROC_THERMAL_NONE) { \
> > >   dev_warn(dev, "Attempted to get power limit
> > > before
> > > device was initialized!\n"); \
> > >   return 0; \
> > >   } \
> > >   \
> > > - if (proc_thermal_emum_mode == PROC_THERMAL_PLATFORM_DEV)
> > > {
> > > \
> > > - pdev = to_platform_device(dev); \
> > > - proc_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); \
> > > - } else { \
> > > - pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev); \
> > > - proc_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev); \
> > > - } \
> > >   return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n",\
> > >   (unsigned long)proc_dev->power_limits[index].suffix *
> > > 1000); \
> > >  }
> > > -- 
> > > 1.7.9.5

2019-04-24 11:47:38

by Sumeet Pawnikar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] thermal: intel: int340x: processor_thermal_device: simplify to get driver data



>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:linux-pm-
>[email protected]] On Behalf Of Zhang Rui
>Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 2:26 PM
>To: Shevchenko, Andriy <[email protected]>; Pawnikar, Sumeet R
><[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected]; [email protected];
>[email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
>[email protected]
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: intel: int340x: processor_thermal_device:
>simplify to get driver data
>
>On 一, 2019-04-22 at 16:46 +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
>> On 一, 2019-04-15 at 19:28 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 08:18:30PM +0530, Sumeet Pawnikar wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > From: "Pawnikar, Sumeet R" <[email protected]>
>> > >
>just one comment, the author name you used is not consistent with the name
>you used for your Signed-off-by 'Pawnikar, Sumeet R <sumeet.r.pawn
>[email protected]>', and checkpatch complains about missing Signed-off-by from
>patch author.
>Please fix your gitconfig and run checkpatch before sending next time.
>
Sure, will fix this going forward.

Thanks,
Sumeet.

>thanks,
>rui
>
>> > > This simplifies getting the 'driver_data' from 'struct device'
>> > > directly.
>> > > Going through platform_device or pci_dev is not required. Also
>> > > removes condition check as the private data stored with dev
>> > > pointer, means irrespective of enumeration mode, we can use
>> > > dev_get_drvdata().
>> > > This removes the unnecessary step back and forth.
>> > >
>> > Indeed, good clean up!
>> > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
>> >
>> Thanks, patch applied.
>>
>> -rui
>> >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Sumeet Pawnikar <[email protected]>
>> > > ---
>> > >  .../int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c     |   11 +-----
>> > > --
>> > > ---
>> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> > >
>> > > diff --git
>> > > a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.
>> > > c
>> > > b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.
>> > > c
>> > > index 8e1cf4d..2a7cbaa 100644
>> > > ---
>> > > a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.
>> > > c
>> > > +++
>> > > b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.
>> > > c
>> > > @@ -81,22 +81,13 @@ enum proc_thermal_emum_mode_type {
>> > >   struct device_attribute
>> > > *attr, \
>> > >   char *buf) \
>> > >  { \
>> > > - struct pci_dev *pci_dev; \
>> > > - struct platform_device *pdev; \
>> > > - struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev; \
>> > > + struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev =
>> > > dev_get_drvdata(dev); \
>> > >   \
>> > >   if (proc_thermal_emum_mode == PROC_THERMAL_NONE) { \
>> > >   dev_warn(dev, "Attempted to get power limit before device
>was
>> > > initialized!\n"); \
>> > >   return 0; \
>> > >   } \
>> > >   \
>> > > - if (proc_thermal_emum_mode == PROC_THERMAL_PLATFORM_DEV)
>> > > {
>> > > \
>> > > - pdev = to_platform_device(dev); \
>> > > - proc_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); \
>> > > - } else { \
>> > > - pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev); \
>> > > - proc_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev); \
>> > > - } \
>> > >   return sprintf(buf, "%lu\n",\
>> > >   (unsigned long)proc_dev->power_limits[index].suffix * 1000); \
>> > >  }
>> > > --
>> > > 1.7.9.5