So this can still be reproduced in 4.9-rc2 by running trinity as a non-root
user within 30-minute on this machine on either ext4 or xfs. Below is the
trace on ext4 and the sysrq-w report.
http://people.redhat.com/qcai/tmp/dmesg-ext4-cgroup-hang
CAI Qian
----- Original Message -----
> From: "tj" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 5:42:19 PM
> Subject: Re: local DoS - systemd hang or timeout (WAS: Re: [RFC][CFT] splice_read reworked)
>
> ...
> > Not sure if related, but right after this lockdep happened and trinity
> > running by a
> > non-privileged user finished inside the container. The host's systemctl
> > command just
> > hang or timeout which renders the whole system unusable.
> >
> > # systemctl status docker
> > Failed to get properties: Connection timed out
> >
> > # systemctl reboot (hang)
> >
> ...
> > [ 5535.893675] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
> > [ 5535.898085] INFO: task kworker/45:4:146035 blocked for more than 120
> > seconds.
> > [ 5535.906059] Tainted: G W 4.8.0-rc8-fornext+ #1
> > [ 5535.912865] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables
> > this message.
> > [ 5535.921613] kworker/45:4 D ffff880853e9b950 14048 146035 2
> > 0x00000080
> > [ 5535.929630] Workqueue: cgroup_destroy css_killed_work_fn
> > [ 5535.935582] ffff880853e9b950 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
> > ffff88086c6da000
> > [ 5535.943882] ffff88086c9e2000 ffff880853e9c000 ffff880853e9baa0
> > ffff88086c9e2000
> > [ 5535.952205] ffff880853e9ba98 0000000000000001 ffff880853e9b968
> > ffffffff817cdaaf
> > [ 5535.960522] Call Trace:
> > [ 5535.963265] [<ffffffff817cdaaf>] schedule+0x3f/0xa0
> > [ 5535.968817] [<ffffffff817d33fb>] schedule_timeout+0x3db/0x6f0
> > [ 5535.975346] [<ffffffff817cf055>] ? wait_for_completion+0x45/0x130
> > [ 5535.982256] [<ffffffff817cf0d3>] wait_for_completion+0xc3/0x130
> > [ 5535.988972] [<ffffffff810d1fd0>] ? wake_up_q+0x80/0x80
> > [ 5535.994804] [<ffffffff8130de64>] drop_sysctl_table+0xc4/0xe0
> > [ 5536.001227] [<ffffffff8130de17>] drop_sysctl_table+0x77/0xe0
> > [ 5536.007648] [<ffffffff8130decd>] unregister_sysctl_table+0x4d/0xa0
> > [ 5536.014654] [<ffffffff8130deff>] unregister_sysctl_table+0x7f/0xa0
> > [ 5536.021657] [<ffffffff810f57f5>]
> > unregister_sched_domain_sysctl+0x15/0x40
> > [ 5536.029344] [<ffffffff810d7704>] partition_sched_domains+0x44/0x450
> > [ 5536.036447] [<ffffffff817d0761>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x111/0x1f0
> > [ 5536.043844] [<ffffffff81167684>] rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x64/0xb0
> > [ 5536.051336] [<ffffffff8116789d>] update_flag+0x11d/0x210
> > [ 5536.057373] [<ffffffff817cf61f>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x2df/0x450
> > [ 5536.064186] [<ffffffff81167acb>] ? cpuset_css_offline+0x1b/0x60
> > [ 5536.070899] [<ffffffff810fce3d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
> > [ 5536.077420] [<ffffffff817cf61f>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x2df/0x450
> > [ 5536.084234] [<ffffffff8115a9f5>] ? css_killed_work_fn+0x25/0x220
> > [ 5536.091049] [<ffffffff81167ae5>] cpuset_css_offline+0x35/0x60
> > [ 5536.097571] [<ffffffff8115aa2c>] css_killed_work_fn+0x5c/0x220
> > [ 5536.104207] [<ffffffff810bc83f>] process_one_work+0x1df/0x710
> > [ 5536.110736] [<ffffffff810bc7c0>] ? process_one_work+0x160/0x710
> > [ 5536.117461] [<ffffffff810bce9b>] worker_thread+0x12b/0x4a0
> > [ 5536.123697] [<ffffffff810bcd70>] ? process_one_work+0x710/0x710
> > [ 5536.130426] [<ffffffff810c3f7e>] kthread+0xfe/0x120
> > [ 5536.135991] [<ffffffff817d4baf>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
> > [ 5536.142041] [<ffffffff810c3e80>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x230/0x230
>
> This one seems to be the offender. cgroup is trying to offline a
> cpuset css, which takes place under cgroup_mutex. The offlining ends
> up trying to drain active usages of a sysctl table which apprently is
> not happening. Did something hang or crash while trying to generate
> sysctl content?