Rather than using static int max_dma_bits, this
can be coverted to use as macro.
Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <[email protected]>
---
drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
index ae1df49..d1eced5 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/swiotlb-xen.c
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@
#include <asm/xen/page-coherent.h>
#include <trace/events/swiotlb.h>
+#define MAX_DMA_BITS 32
/*
* Used to do a quick range check in swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single and
* swiotlb_tbl_sync_single_*, to see if the memory was in fact allocated by this
@@ -114,8 +115,6 @@ static int is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dma_addr_t dma_addr)
return 0;
}
-static int max_dma_bits = 32;
-
static int
xen_swiotlb_fixup(void *buf, size_t size, unsigned long nslabs)
{
@@ -135,7 +134,7 @@ static int is_xen_swiotlb_buffer(dma_addr_t dma_addr)
p + (i << IO_TLB_SHIFT),
get_order(slabs << IO_TLB_SHIFT),
dma_bits, &dma_handle);
- } while (rc && dma_bits++ < max_dma_bits);
+ } while (rc && dma_bits++ < MAX_DMA_BITS);
if (rc)
return rc;
--
1.9.1
On 01.09.19 21:28, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> Rather than using static int max_dma_bits, this
> can be coverted to use as macro.
>
> Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder <[email protected]>
s/zen/xen/ in the patch title, other than that:
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <[email protected]>
Juergen