2019-11-18 03:52:45

by Can Guo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: ufs: Update VCCQ2 and VCCQ min/max voltage hard codes

From: Can Guo <[email protected]>

Per UFS 3.0 JEDEC standard, the VCCQ2 min voltage is 1.7v and the VCCQ
voltage range is 1.14v ~ 1.26v. Update their hard codes accordingly to
make sure they work in a safe range compliant for ver 1.0/2.0/2.1/3.0
UFS devices.

Signed-off-by: Can Guo <[email protected]>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
index 385bac8..9df4f4d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
@@ -500,9 +500,9 @@ struct ufs_query_res {
#define UFS_VREG_VCC_MAX_UV 3600000 /* uV */
#define UFS_VREG_VCC_1P8_MIN_UV 1700000 /* uV */
#define UFS_VREG_VCC_1P8_MAX_UV 1950000 /* uV */
-#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MIN_UV 1100000 /* uV */
+#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MIN_UV 1140000 /* uV */
#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MAX_UV 1300000 /* uV */
-#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MIN_UV 1650000 /* uV */
+#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MIN_UV 1700000 /* uV */
#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MAX_UV 1950000 /* uV */

/*
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project


2019-11-18 07:16:57

by Avri Altman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: ufs: Update VCCQ2 and VCCQ min/max voltage hard codes

>
> From: Can Guo <[email protected]>
>
> Per UFS 3.0 JEDEC standard, the VCCQ2 min voltage is 1.7v and the VCCQ
> voltage range is 1.14v ~ 1.26v. Update their hard codes accordingly to make
> sure they work in a safe range compliant for ver 1.0/2.0/2.1/3.0 UFS devices.
So to keep it safe, we need to use largest range:
min_uV = min over all spec ranges, and max_uV = max over all spec ranges.
Meaning leave it as it is if we want to be backward compatible with UFS1.0.

Thanks,
Avri

>
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h index 385bac8..9df4f4d
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
> @@ -500,9 +500,9 @@ struct ufs_query_res {
> #define UFS_VREG_VCC_MAX_UV 3600000 /* uV */
> #define UFS_VREG_VCC_1P8_MIN_UV 1700000 /* uV */
> #define UFS_VREG_VCC_1P8_MAX_UV 1950000 /* uV */
> -#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MIN_UV 1100000 /* uV */
> +#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MIN_UV 1140000 /* uV */
> #define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MAX_UV 1300000 /* uV */
> -#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MIN_UV 1650000 /* uV */
> +#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MIN_UV 1700000 /* uV */
> #define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MAX_UV 1950000 /* uV */
>
> /*
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

2019-11-19 02:02:19

by Can Guo

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] scsi: ufs: Update VCCQ2 and VCCQ min/max voltage hard codes

On 2019-11-18 15:15, Avri Altman wrote:
>>
>> From: Can Guo <[email protected]>
>>
>> Per UFS 3.0 JEDEC standard, the VCCQ2 min voltage is 1.7v and the VCCQ
>> voltage range is 1.14v ~ 1.26v. Update their hard codes accordingly to
>> make
>> sure they work in a safe range compliant for ver 1.0/2.0/2.1/3.0 UFS
>> devices.
> So to keep it safe, we need to use largest range:
> min_uV = min over all spec ranges, and max_uV = max over all spec
> ranges.
> Meaning leave it as it is if we want to be backward compatible with
> UFS1.0.
>
> Thanks,
> Avri
>

Hi Avri,

Sorry I don't quite follow you here.
Leaving it as it is means for UFS2.1 devices, when boot up, if we call
regulator_set_voltage(1.65, 1.95) to setup its VCCQ2,
regulator_set_voltage() will
give you 1.65v on VCCQ2 if the voltage level of this regulator is wider,
say (1.60, 1.95).
Meaning you will finally set 1.65v to VCCQ2. But 1.65v is out of spec
for UFS v2.1 as it
requires min voltage to be 1.7v on VCCQ2. So, the smallest range is
safe.
Of course, in real board design, the regulator's voltage level is
limited/designed by power team
to be in a safe range, say (1.8, 1.92), so that calling
regulator_set_voltage(1.65, 1.95) still gives
you 1.8v. But it does not mean the current hard codes are compliant for
all UFS devices.

Best Regards,
Can Guo.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h index
>> 385bac8..9df4f4d
>> 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs.h
>> @@ -500,9 +500,9 @@ struct ufs_query_res {
>> #define UFS_VREG_VCC_MAX_UV 3600000 /* uV */
>> #define UFS_VREG_VCC_1P8_MIN_UV 1700000 /* uV */
>> #define UFS_VREG_VCC_1P8_MAX_UV 1950000 /* uV */
>> -#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MIN_UV 1100000 /* uV */
>> +#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MIN_UV 1140000 /* uV */
>> #define UFS_VREG_VCCQ_MAX_UV 1300000 /* uV */
>> -#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MIN_UV 1650000 /* uV */
>> +#define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MIN_UV 1700000 /* uV */
>> #define UFS_VREG_VCCQ2_MAX_UV 1950000 /* uV */
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
>> Forum,
>> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project