2020-01-21 10:23:19

by Manish Narani

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] sdhci: arasan: Remove quirk for broken base clock

This patch removes quirk which indicates a broken base clock. This was
making the kernel report wrong base clock of ~187MHz instead of 200MHz
even as the measurement on the hardware was showing 200MHz.

Signed-off-by: Manish Narani <[email protected]>
State: pending
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
index 39176ab5ca1f..0146d7dd315b 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
@@ -358,6 +358,17 @@ static struct sdhci_arasan_of_data sdhci_arasan_data = {
.pdata = &sdhci_arasan_pdata,
};

+static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_arasan_zynqmp_pdata = {
+ .ops = &sdhci_arasan_ops,
+ .quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN |
+ SDHCI_QUIRK2_CLOCK_DIV_ZERO_BROKEN |
+ SDHCI_QUIRK2_STOP_WITH_TC,
+};
+
+static struct sdhci_arasan_of_data sdhci_arasan_zynqmp_data = {
+ .pdata = &sdhci_arasan_zynqmp_pdata,
+};
+
static u32 sdhci_arasan_cqhci_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
{
int cmd_error = 0;
@@ -553,7 +564,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id sdhci_arasan_of_match[] = {
},
{
.compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-8.9a",
- .data = &sdhci_arasan_data,
+ .data = &sdhci_arasan_zynqmp_data,
},
{ /* sentinel */ }
};
--
2.17.1


2020-02-03 12:54:33

by Adrian Hunter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sdhci: arasan: Remove quirk for broken base clock

On 21/01/20 12:21 pm, Manish Narani wrote:
> This patch removes quirk which indicates a broken base clock. This was
> making the kernel report wrong base clock of ~187MHz instead of 200MHz
> even as the measurement on the hardware was showing 200MHz.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manish Narani <[email protected]>
> State: pending

Huh?

Otherwise:

Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
> index 39176ab5ca1f..0146d7dd315b 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-arasan.c
> @@ -358,6 +358,17 @@ static struct sdhci_arasan_of_data sdhci_arasan_data = {
> .pdata = &sdhci_arasan_pdata,
> };
>
> +static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_arasan_zynqmp_pdata = {
> + .ops = &sdhci_arasan_ops,
> + .quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN |
> + SDHCI_QUIRK2_CLOCK_DIV_ZERO_BROKEN |
> + SDHCI_QUIRK2_STOP_WITH_TC,
> +};
> +
> +static struct sdhci_arasan_of_data sdhci_arasan_zynqmp_data = {
> + .pdata = &sdhci_arasan_zynqmp_pdata,
> +};
> +
> static u32 sdhci_arasan_cqhci_irq(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 intmask)
> {
> int cmd_error = 0;
> @@ -553,7 +564,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id sdhci_arasan_of_match[] = {
> },
> {
> .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-8.9a",
> - .data = &sdhci_arasan_data,
> + .data = &sdhci_arasan_zynqmp_data,
> },
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
>

2020-02-04 11:44:48

by Michal Simek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sdhci: arasan: Remove quirk for broken base clock

On 03. 02. 20 12:31, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 21/01/20 12:21 pm, Manish Narani wrote:
>> This patch removes quirk which indicates a broken base clock. This was
>> making the kernel report wrong base clock of ~187MHz instead of 200MHz
>> even as the measurement on the hardware was showing 200MHz.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Manish Narani <[email protected]>
>> State: pending
>
> Huh?

It shouldn't be here. It is internal patch labeling.
Manish: Please send v2 with all lines you got and remove this above.

>
> Otherwise:
>
> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>

These patches requires firmware changes. Feel free to take it directly
via your tree. If you want me to take it via arm-soc tree please let me
know.

Thanks,
Michal

2020-02-04 12:31:47

by Ulf Hansson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sdhci: arasan: Remove quirk for broken base clock

On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 12:42, Michal Simek <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 03. 02. 20 12:31, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > On 21/01/20 12:21 pm, Manish Narani wrote:
> >> This patch removes quirk which indicates a broken base clock. This was
> >> making the kernel report wrong base clock of ~187MHz instead of 200MHz
> >> even as the measurement on the hardware was showing 200MHz.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Manish Narani <[email protected]>
> >> State: pending
> >
> > Huh?
>
> It shouldn't be here. It is internal patch labeling.
> Manish: Please send v2 with all lines you got and remove this above.

No need for a resend, I can fix this before applying, which will be
when rc1 is out.

>
> >
> > Otherwise:
> >
> > Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
>
> These patches requires firmware changes. Feel free to take it directly
> via your tree. If you want me to take it via arm-soc tree please let me
> know.

Thanks, I pick them up via my mmc tree then.

Kind regards
Uffe

2020-02-04 12:34:38

by Michal Simek

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sdhci: arasan: Remove quirk for broken base clock

On 04. 02. 20 13:29, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 12:42, Michal Simek <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On 03. 02. 20 12:31, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> On 21/01/20 12:21 pm, Manish Narani wrote:
>>>> This patch removes quirk which indicates a broken base clock. This was
>>>> making the kernel report wrong base clock of ~187MHz instead of 200MHz
>>>> even as the measurement on the hardware was showing 200MHz.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Manish Narani <[email protected]>
>>>> State: pending
>>>
>>> Huh?
>>
>> It shouldn't be here. It is internal patch labeling.
>> Manish: Please send v2 with all lines you got and remove this above.
>
> No need for a resend, I can fix this before applying, which will be
> when rc1 is out.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Otherwise:
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Adrian Hunter <[email protected]>
>>
>> These patches requires firmware changes. Feel free to take it directly
>> via your tree. If you want me to take it via arm-soc tree please let me
>> know.
>
> Thanks, I pick them up via my mmc tree then.

ok. Please let me know if there is any conflict. It should be simple add.

Thanks,
Michal