2020-04-14 06:36:00

by Zou Wei

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH-next] locktorture: use true, false for bool variable

Fixes coccicheck warning:

kernel/locking/locktorture.c:689:6-10: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:907:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:938:3-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:668:2-19: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:674:2-19: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:634:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
kernel/locking/locktorture.c:640:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <[email protected]>
---
kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
index 5efbfc6..8ff6f50 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
@@ -631,13 +631,13 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg)
cxt.cur_ops->writelock();
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lock_is_write_held))
lwsp->n_lock_fail++;
- lock_is_write_held = 1;
+ lock_is_write_held = true;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lock_is_read_held))
lwsp->n_lock_fail++; /* rare, but... */

lwsp->n_lock_acquired++;
cxt.cur_ops->write_delay(&rand);
- lock_is_write_held = 0;
+ lock_is_write_held = false;
cxt.cur_ops->writeunlock();

stutter_wait("lock_torture_writer");
@@ -665,13 +665,13 @@ static int lock_torture_reader(void *arg)
schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);

cxt.cur_ops->readlock();
- lock_is_read_held = 1;
+ lock_is_read_held = true;
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lock_is_write_held))
lrsp->n_lock_fail++; /* rare, but... */

lrsp->n_lock_acquired++;
cxt.cur_ops->read_delay(&rand);
- lock_is_read_held = 0;
+ lock_is_read_held = false;
cxt.cur_ops->readunlock();

stutter_wait("lock_torture_reader");
@@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static int lock_torture_reader(void *arg)
static void __torture_print_stats(char *page,
struct lock_stress_stats *statp, bool write)
{
- bool fail = 0;
+ bool fail = false;
int i, n_stress;
long max = 0, min = statp ? statp[0].n_lock_acquired : 0;
long long sum = 0;
@@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)

/* Initialize the statistics so that each run gets its own numbers. */
if (nwriters_stress) {
- lock_is_write_held = 0;
+ lock_is_write_held = false;
cxt.lwsa = kmalloc_array(cxt.nrealwriters_stress,
sizeof(*cxt.lwsa),
GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
}

if (nreaders_stress) {
- lock_is_read_held = 0;
+ lock_is_read_held = false;
cxt.lrsa = kmalloc_array(cxt.nrealreaders_stress,
sizeof(*cxt.lrsa),
GFP_KERNEL);
--
2.6.2


2020-04-15 13:41:15

by Paul E. McKenney

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH-next] locktorture: use true, false for bool variable

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 08:02:59PM +0800, Zou Wei wrote:
> Fixes coccicheck warning:
>
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c:689:6-10: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c:907:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c:938:3-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c:668:2-19: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c:674:2-19: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c:634:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c:640:2-20: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Zou Wei <[email protected]>

Applied, thank you!

Thanx, Paul

> ---
> kernel/locking/locktorture.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> index 5efbfc6..8ff6f50 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/locktorture.c
> @@ -631,13 +631,13 @@ static int lock_torture_writer(void *arg)
> cxt.cur_ops->writelock();
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lock_is_write_held))
> lwsp->n_lock_fail++;
> - lock_is_write_held = 1;
> + lock_is_write_held = true;
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lock_is_read_held))
> lwsp->n_lock_fail++; /* rare, but... */
>
> lwsp->n_lock_acquired++;
> cxt.cur_ops->write_delay(&rand);
> - lock_is_write_held = 0;
> + lock_is_write_held = false;
> cxt.cur_ops->writeunlock();
>
> stutter_wait("lock_torture_writer");
> @@ -665,13 +665,13 @@ static int lock_torture_reader(void *arg)
> schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
>
> cxt.cur_ops->readlock();
> - lock_is_read_held = 1;
> + lock_is_read_held = true;
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(lock_is_write_held))
> lrsp->n_lock_fail++; /* rare, but... */
>
> lrsp->n_lock_acquired++;
> cxt.cur_ops->read_delay(&rand);
> - lock_is_read_held = 0;
> + lock_is_read_held = false;
> cxt.cur_ops->readunlock();
>
> stutter_wait("lock_torture_reader");
> @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ static int lock_torture_reader(void *arg)
> static void __torture_print_stats(char *page,
> struct lock_stress_stats *statp, bool write)
> {
> - bool fail = 0;
> + bool fail = false;
> int i, n_stress;
> long max = 0, min = statp ? statp[0].n_lock_acquired : 0;
> long long sum = 0;
> @@ -904,7 +904,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
>
> /* Initialize the statistics so that each run gets its own numbers. */
> if (nwriters_stress) {
> - lock_is_write_held = 0;
> + lock_is_write_held = false;
> cxt.lwsa = kmalloc_array(cxt.nrealwriters_stress,
> sizeof(*cxt.lwsa),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -935,7 +935,7 @@ static int __init lock_torture_init(void)
> }
>
> if (nreaders_stress) {
> - lock_is_read_held = 0;
> + lock_is_read_held = false;
> cxt.lrsa = kmalloc_array(cxt.nrealreaders_stress,
> sizeof(*cxt.lrsa),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> --
> 2.6.2
>