2020-06-11 13:00:45

by Qing Zhang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] spi: tools: Make default_tx/rx and input_tx static

Fix the following sparse warning:

./spidev_test.c:50:9: warning: symbol 'default_tx' was not declared. Should it be static?
./spidev_test.c:59:9: warning: symbol 'default_rx' was not declared. Should it be static?
./spidev_test.c:60:6: warning: symbol 'input_tx' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Qing Zhang <[email protected]>
---
tools/spi/spidev_test.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/spi/spidev_test.c b/tools/spi/spidev_test.c
index 56ea053f..83844f8 100644
--- a/tools/spi/spidev_test.c
+++ b/tools/spi/spidev_test.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static int transfer_size;
static int iterations;
static int interval = 5; /* interval in seconds for showing transfer rate */

-uint8_t default_tx[] = {
+static uint8_t default_tx[] = {
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF,
0x40, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x95,
0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF,
@@ -56,8 +56,8 @@ uint8_t default_tx[] = {
0xF0, 0x0D,
};

-uint8_t default_rx[ARRAY_SIZE(default_tx)] = {0, };
-char *input_tx;
+static uint8_t default_rx[ARRAY_SIZE(default_tx)] = {0, };
+static char *input_tx;

static void hex_dump(const void *src, size_t length, size_t line_size,
char *prefix)
--
2.1.0


2020-06-11 13:01:18

by Qing Zhang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: tools: Add macro definitions to fix build errors

Add SPI_TX_OCTAL and SPI_RX_OCTAL to fix the following build errors:

CC spidev_test.o
spidev_test.c: In function ‘transfer’:
spidev_test.c:131:13: error: ‘SPI_TX_OCTAL’ undeclared (first use in this function)
if (mode & SPI_TX_OCTAL)
^
spidev_test.c:131:13: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
spidev_test.c:137:13: error: ‘SPI_RX_OCTAL’ undeclared (first use in this function)
if (mode & SPI_RX_OCTAL)
^
spidev_test.c: In function ‘parse_opts’:
spidev_test.c:290:12: error: ‘SPI_TX_OCTAL’ undeclared (first use in this function)
mode |= SPI_TX_OCTAL;
^
spidev_test.c:308:12: error: ‘SPI_RX_OCTAL’ undeclared (first use in this function)
mode |= SPI_RX_OCTAL;
^
LD spidev_test-in.o
ld: cannot find spidev_test.o: No such file or directory

Additionally, maybe SPI_CS_WORD and SPI_3WIRE_HIZ will be used in the future,
so add them too.

Fixes: 896fa735084e ("spi: spidev_test: Add support for Octal mode data transfers")
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Qing Zhang <[email protected]>
---

v2:
-Modify the patch subject
-Update the commit message
-Add macro definitions of SPI_CS_WORD and SPI_3WIRE_HIZ

include/uapi/linux/spi/spidev.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/spi/spidev.h b/include/uapi/linux/spi/spidev.h
index ee0f246..9390615 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/spi/spidev.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/spi/spidev.h
@@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
#define SPI_TX_QUAD 0x200
#define SPI_RX_DUAL 0x400
#define SPI_RX_QUAD 0x800
+#define SPI_CS_WORD 0x1000
+#define SPI_TX_OCTAL 0x2000
+#define SPI_RX_OCTAL 0x4000
+#define SPI_3WIRE_HIZ 0x8000

/*---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/

--
2.1.0

2020-06-11 15:33:03

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] spi: tools: Make default_tx/rx and input_tx static

On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 20:56:51 +0800, Qing Zhang wrote:
> Fix the following sparse warning:
>
> ./spidev_test.c:50:9: warning: symbol 'default_tx' was not declared. Should it be static?
> ./spidev_test.c:59:9: warning: symbol 'default_rx' was not declared. Should it be static?
> ./spidev_test.c:60:6: warning: symbol 'input_tx' was not declared. Should it be static?

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] spi: tools: Make default_tx/rx and input_tx static
commit: bd2077915bfebf6965480753f9dd6a8319d06d14
[2/2] spi: tools: Add macro definitions to fix build errors
commit: 7bb64402a092136fb2fda995b0e0304b43c163c5

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark