Hi all
In fs/*.c, many functions manually set the task state directly
accessing current->state, or with a macro, kind of
inconsistently. This patch changes all of them to use
[__]set_current_state().
Changelog:
Take 3:
- Port to 2.5.64
- Port to 2.5.57
- Use safe set_current_state() instead of __set... in
exec.c:de_thread()
Take 2:
- Added feedback from Robert Love regarding usage of
__set_current_thread() vs. set_current_thread() to avoid race
conditions related to memory flush.
- Use cond_resched() in namei.c:do_follow_link().
Take 1:
- Ported forward to 2.5.52
diff -u linux/fs/exec.c:1.1.1.15 linux/fs/exec.c:1.1.1.1.6.6
--- linux/fs/exec.c:1.1.1.15 Mon Feb 24 21:04:49 2003
+++ linux/fs/exec.c Wed Mar 5 15:06:02 2003
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@
count = 1;
while (atomic_read(&oldsig->count) > count) {
oldsig->group_exit_task = current;
- current->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
+ set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
spin_unlock_irq(lock);
schedule();
spin_lock_irq(lock);
diff -u linux/fs/inode.c:1.1.1.10 linux/fs/inode.c:1.1.1.1.6.6
--- linux/fs/inode.c:1.1.1.10 Wed Mar 5 08:12:22 2003
+++ linux/fs/inode.c Wed Mar 5 15:06:02 2003
@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@
goto repeat;
}
remove_wait_queue(wq, &wait);
- current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
+ __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
}
void wake_up_inode(struct inode *inode)
diff -u linux/fs/locks.c:1.1.1.7 linux/fs/locks.c:1.1.1.1.6.4
--- linux/fs/locks.c:1.1.1.7 Tue Feb 18 12:51:54 2003
+++ linux/fs/locks.c Wed Mar 5 15:06:02 2003
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@
int result = 0;
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
- current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
+ set_current_state (TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
add_wait_queue(fl_wait, &wait);
if (timeout == 0)
schedule();
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@
if (signal_pending(current))
result = -ERESTARTSYS;
remove_wait_queue(fl_wait, &wait);
- current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
+ __set_current_state (TASK_RUNNING);
return result;
}
diff -u linux/fs/namei.c:1.1.1.9 linux/fs/namei.c:1.1.1.1.6.6
--- linux/fs/namei.c:1.1.1.9 Tue Feb 18 12:51:54 2003
+++ linux/fs/namei.c Wed Mar 5 15:06:02 2003
@@ -388,10 +388,7 @@
goto loop;
if (current->total_link_count >= 40)
goto loop;
- if (need_resched()) {
- current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
- schedule();
- }
+ cond_resched();
err = security_inode_follow_link(dentry, nd);
if (err)
goto loop;
diff -u linux/fs/select.c:1.1.1.5 linux/fs/select.c:1.1.1.1.6.4
--- linux/fs/select.c:1.1.1.5 Fri Jan 10 14:36:46 2003
+++ linux/fs/select.c Fri Jan 10 16:45:54 2003
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@
}
__timeout = schedule_timeout(__timeout);
}
- current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
+ __set_current_state (TASK_RUNNING);
poll_freewait(&table);
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@
break;
timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout);
}
- current->state = TASK_RUNNING;
+ __set_current_state (TASK_RUNNING);
return count;
}
--
Inaky Perez-Gonzalez -- Not speaking for Intel - opinions are my own [or my fault]