The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses" instead
of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
aforementioned wording.
Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
--- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
+++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing identical callback
mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
-Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
+Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
--
2.9.3
On 2020-08-19 22:53, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
> loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
> It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses"
> instead
> of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
> aforementioned wording.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing
> identical callback
> mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
> handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
>
> -Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
> +Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
> hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
> be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
> interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Ping - looks like this was never applied?
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 6:23 AM Marc Zyngier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-19 22:53, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> > The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
> > loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
> > It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses"
> > instead
> > of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
> > aforementioned wording.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> > @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing
> > identical callback
> > mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
> > handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
> >
> > -Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
> > +Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
> > hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
> > be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
> > interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
>
> Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
>
> M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...