We've met softlockup with "CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y", when
the target memcg doesn't have any reclaimable memory.
It can be easily reproduced as below:
watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 111s![memcg_test:2204]
CPU: 0 PID: 2204 Comm: memcg_test Not tainted 5.9.0-rc2+ #12
Call Trace:
shrink_lruvec+0x49f/0x640
shrink_node+0x2a6/0x6f0
do_try_to_free_pages+0xe9/0x3e0
try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages+0xef/0x1f0
try_charge+0x2c1/0x750
mem_cgroup_charge+0xd7/0x240
__add_to_page_cache_locked+0x2fd/0x370
add_to_page_cache_lru+0x4a/0xc0
pagecache_get_page+0x10b/0x2f0
filemap_fault+0x661/0xad0
ext4_filemap_fault+0x2c/0x40
__do_fault+0x4d/0xf9
handle_mm_fault+0x1080/0x1790
It only happens on our 1-vcpu instances, because there's no chance
for oom reaper to run to reclaim the to-be-killed process.
Add a cond_resched() at the upper shrink_node_memcgs() to solve this
issue, this will mean that we will get a scheduling point for each
memcg in the reclaimed hierarchy without any dependency on the
reclaimable memory in that memcg thus making it more predictable.
Acked-by: Chris Down <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <[email protected]>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 99e1796..9727dd8 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2615,6 +2615,14 @@ static void shrink_node_memcgs(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
unsigned long reclaimed;
unsigned long scanned;
+ /*
+ * This loop can become CPU-bound when target memcgs
+ * aren't eligible for reclaim - either because they
+ * don't have any reclaimable pages, or because their
+ * memory is explicitly protected. Avoid soft lockups.
+ */
+ cond_resched();
+
mem_cgroup_calculate_protection(target_memcg, memcg);
if (mem_cgroup_below_min(memcg)) {
--
1.8.3.1
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:32:29AM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
> We've met softlockup with "CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y", when
> the target memcg doesn't have any reclaimable memory.
>
> It can be easily reproduced as below:
> watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 111s![memcg_test:2204]
> CPU: 0 PID: 2204 Comm: memcg_test Not tainted 5.9.0-rc2+ #12
> Call Trace:
> shrink_lruvec+0x49f/0x640
> shrink_node+0x2a6/0x6f0
> do_try_to_free_pages+0xe9/0x3e0
> try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages+0xef/0x1f0
> try_charge+0x2c1/0x750
> mem_cgroup_charge+0xd7/0x240
> __add_to_page_cache_locked+0x2fd/0x370
> add_to_page_cache_lru+0x4a/0xc0
> pagecache_get_page+0x10b/0x2f0
> filemap_fault+0x661/0xad0
> ext4_filemap_fault+0x2c/0x40
> __do_fault+0x4d/0xf9
> handle_mm_fault+0x1080/0x1790
>
> It only happens on our 1-vcpu instances, because there's no chance
> for oom reaper to run to reclaim the to-be-killed process.
>
> Add a cond_resched() at the upper shrink_node_memcgs() to solve this
> issue, this will mean that we will get a scheduling point for each
> memcg in the reclaimed hierarchy without any dependency on the
> reclaimable memory in that memcg thus making it more predictable.
>
> Acked-by: Chris Down <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>