On 29/08/2023 05:44, Steve Clevenger wrote:
>
> Ampere has been using the following command sequence to generate a 'perf
> record' kernel instruction trace on an AmpereOne AARCH64 based systems
> using a 6.3.0 Fedora distribution with CoreSight related patches.
>
>
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# uname -a
> Linux sut01sys-b212.scc-lab.amperecomputing.com 6.3.0-coresight-enabled+
> #9 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Fri Jun 30 12:54:14 PDT 2023 aarch64 aarch64
> aarch64 GNU/Linux
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]#
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# timeout 45s perf record --kcore -o kcore -e
> cs_etm/@tmc_etr63/k --per-thread taskset --cpu-list 15 dd if=/dev/zero
> of=/dev/null
> [ perf record: Woken up 41 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 144.056 MB kcore ]
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]#
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# ls -l ~/linux/vmlinux
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 390426912 Jun 30 12:54 /home/stevec/linux/vmlinux*
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]#
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# timeout 45s perf script --input
> ./kcore/data -s ../../scripts/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py -F
> cpu,event,ip,addr,sym – -d objdump -k ~/linux/vmlinux > ./perf.itrace
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]#
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# ls -l perf.itrace
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 485834744 Jul 17 14:18 perf.itrace
>
>
> The executive summary is the code sections in vmlinux do not match the
> actual code executing on the target due to self-modifying code
> (alternate code sequences) in the kernel image. These sequences are
> typically applied over nop place-holder instructions. This was verified
> by comparing a location in the ./drivers/char/mem.c read_zero objdump
> instruction stream to the memory resident instructions captured with the
> TRACE32 ETM instruction trace feature. This particular instruction trace
> example shows a disconnect. It displays a ‘b ffff800008ab8a70
> <read_zero+0x168>’ instruction at address 0xffff800008ab89e8 which did
> not branch. The actual instruction present at 0xffff800008ab89e8 is a ‘nop’.
> .
> .
> ffff800008ab89a8: 1400000d b ffff800008ab89dc
> <read_zero+0xd4>
> dd 8774/8774 [0015] 0.000000000 read_zero+0xa0
> ffff800008ab89dc <read_zero+0xd4>:
> ffff800008ab89dc: 9248f840 and x0, x2,
> #0xff7fffffffffffff
> ffff800008ab89e0: aa1403e1 mov x1, x20
> ffff800008ab89e4: 9418b6fb bl ffff8000090e65d0
> <__arch_clear_user>
> dd 8774/8774 [0015] 0.000000000 read_zero+0xdc
> ffff8000090e65d0 <__arch_clear_user>:
> ffff8000090e65d0: d503245f bti c
> ffff8000090e65d4: 8b010002 add x2, x0, x1
> ffff8000090e65d8: f1002021 subs x1, x1, #0x8
> ffff8000090e65dc: 54000104 b.mi ffff8000090e65fc
> <__arch_clear_user+0x2c> // b.first
> ffff8000090e65e0: f800081f sttr xzr, [x0]
> ffff8000090e65e4: 91002000 add x0, x0, #0x8
> ffff8000090e65e8: f1002021 subs x1, x1, #0x8
> ffff8000090e65ec: 54ffffa8 b.hi ffff8000090e65e0
> <__arch_clear_user+0x10> // b.pmore
> dd 8774/8774 [0015] 0.000000000
> __arch_clear_user+0x1c
> ...vec/linux/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S 31 b.hi 1b
> ffff8000090e65e0 <__arch_clear_user+0x10>:
> ffff8000090e65e0: f800081f sttr xzr, [x0]
> ffff8000090e65e4: 91002000 add x0, x0, #0x8
> ffff8000090e65e8: f1002021 subs x1, x1, #0x8
> ffff8000090e65ec: 54ffffa8 b.hi ffff8000090e65e0
> <__arch_clear_user+0x10> // b.pmore
> .
> .
> ffff8000090e65f0: f81f885f sttr xzr, [x2, #-8]
> ffff8000090e65f4: d2800000 mov x0, #0x0
> // #0
> ffff8000090e65f8: d65f03c0 ret
> dd 8774/8774 [0015] 0.000000000
> __arch_clear_user+0x28
> ...vec/linux/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S 34 ret
> ffff800008ab89e8 <read_zero+0xe0>:
> ffff800008ab89e8: 14000022 b ffff800008ab8a70
> <read_zero+0x168>
> ffff800008ab89ec: d503201f nop
> dd 8774/8774 [0015] 0.000000000 read_zero+0xe4
> /home/stevec/linux/drivers/char/mem.c 521
> left = clear_user(buf + cleared, chunk);
> ffff800008ab8a18 <read_zero+0x110>:
> ffff800008ab8a18: 8b14035a add x26, x26, x20
> ffff800008ab8a1c: b5000360 cbnz x0,
> ffff800008ab8a88 <read_zero+0x180>
> ffff800008ab8a20: f9400320 ldr x0, [x25]
> ffff800008ab8a24: cb140273 sub x19, x19, x20
> .
> .
>
> Ostensibly, the ‘perf record –kcore’ option produces a representative
> image of the kernel. But this option does not produce suitable output to
> generate ARM64 kernel instruction trace. perf doesn’t disassemble ARM64,
> so the arm-cs-trace-disasm.py python script is used with the native
> objdump utility to provide ARM64 disassembly from CoreSight trace
> capture. objdump itself requires an ELF/DWARF file image + symbols to
> generate the symbolic (+ line information for mixed source) disassembly.
> The linux vmlinux image + symbols file is typically used for this
> purpose. The kallsyms file is not formatted for objdump use. As an
> experiment, I patched the executable code sections in a local copy of
> vmlinux with the corresponding executable code segments extracted from
> the kcore image using an Ampere internal ELF patch utility.
>
> This patch utility leverages the (MIT Licensed) ELFIO open source
> library API. These were the commands.
>
>
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# timeout 30s perf record --kcore -o kcore -e
> cs_etm/@tmc_etr63/k --per-thread taskset --cpu-list 15 dd if=/dev/zero
> of=/dev/null
> [ perf record: Woken up 25 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 88.053 MB kcore ]
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]#
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# ls -l ~/linux/vmlinux
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 390426912 Jun 30 12:54 /home/stevec/linux/vmlinux*
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# cp ~/linux/vmlinux .
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# patch-elf --help
>
> patch-elf overlays the kernel image from a local copy of
> '/proc/kcore' to the corresponding (by address) ELF sections
> in a local copy of the vmlinux ELF file.
> A local '/proc/kcore' is created by:
> 'perf report --kcore -e cs_etm/@tmc_etr1/k ...'
> The local (patched) vmlinux copy is used by:
> 'perf script -s arm-cs-trace-disasm.py ...'
> See the CoreSight Hardware-Assisted Trace Application Note for
> use of the 'perf report' and 'perf script' commands.
>
> Usage: patch-elf <--verbose> kcore_file vmlinux_file
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]#
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# patch-elf kcore/kcore_dir/kcore ./vmlinux
> ELF File kcore Properties
> ELF file class: ELF64
> ELF file encoding: Little endian
> Machine: ARM AArch64
> Type: Core file
> Number of segments: 3
> Number of sections: 0
>
> ELF File vmlinux Properties
> ELF file class: ELF64
> ELF file encoding: Little endian
> Machine: ARM AArch64
> Type: Shared object file
> Number of segments: 3
> Number of sections: 43
>
> Patching section[ 2] ffff800008010000 17997936 bytes
>
> Patching section[15] ffff800009a31000 20480 bytes
>
> Patching section[16] ffff800009a40000 612372 bytes
>
> Patching section[17] ffff800009ad5818 24752 bytes
>
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# ls -l ./vmlinux
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 390426908 Jul 19 11:14 ./vmlinux*
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]#
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# timeout 45s perf script --input
> ./kcore/data -s ../../scripts/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py -F
> cpu,event,ip,addr,sym – -d objdump -k ./vmlinux > ./perf.itrace
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]#
> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# ls -l perf.itrace
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 32142060 Jul 19 11:18 perf.itrace
>
> Here is the representative kernel instruction trace using a patched vmlinux.
>
> .
> .
> ffff800008ab89a8: 1400000d b ffff800008ab89dc
> <read_zero+0xd4>
> dd 8774/8774 [0015] 0.000000000 read_zero+0xa0
> ffff800008ab89dc <read_zero+0xd4>:
> ffff800008ab89dc: 9248f840 and x0, x2,
> #0xff7fffffffffffff
> ffff800008ab89e0: aa1403e1 mov x1, x20
> ffff800008ab89e4: 9418b6fb bl ffff8000090e65d0
> <__arch_clear_user>
> dd 8774/8774 [0015] 0.000000000 read_zero+0xdc
> ffff8000090e65d0 <__arch_clear_user>:
> ffff8000090e65d0: d503245f bti c
> ffff8000090e65d4: 8b010002 add x2, x0, x1
> ffff8000090e65d8: f1002021 subs x1, x1, #0x8
> ffff8000090e65dc: 54000104 b.mi ffff8000090e65fc
> <__arch_clear_user+0x2c> // b.first
> ffff8000090e65e0: f800081f sttr xzr, [x0]
> ffff8000090e65e4: 91002000 add x0, x0, #0x8
> ffff8000090e65e8: f1002021 subs x1, x1, #0x8
> ffff8000090e65ec: 54ffffa8 b.hi ffff8000090e65e0
> <__arch_clear_user+0x10> // b.pmore
> dd 8774/8774 [0015] 0.000000000
> __arch_clear_user+0x1c
> ffff8000090e65e0 <__arch_clear_user+0x10>:
> ffff8000090e65e0: f800081f sttr xzr, [x0]
> ffff8000090e65e4: 91002000 add x0, x0, #0x8
> ffff8000090e65e8: f1002021 subs x1, x1, #0x8
> ffff8000090e65ec: 54ffffa8 b.hi ffff8000090e65e0
> <__arch_clear_user+0x10> // b.pmore
> .
> .
> ffff8000090e65f0: f81f885f sttr xzr, [x2, #-8]
> ffff8000090e65f4: d2800000 mov x0, #0x0
> // #0
> ffff8000090e65f8: d65f03c0 ret
> dd 8774/8774 [0015] 0.000000000
> __arch_clear_user+0x28
> ...vec/linux/arch/arm64/lib/clear_user.S 34 ret
> ffff800008ab89e8 <read_zero+0xe0>:
> ffff800008ab89e8: d503201f nop
> ffff800008ab89ec: 1400000b b ffff800008ab8a18
> <read_zero+0x110>
> dd 8774/8774 [0015] 0.000000000 read_zero+0xe4
> /home/stevec/linux/drivers/char/mem.c 521
> left = clear_user(buf + cleared, chunk);
> ffff800008ab8a18 <read_zero+0x110>:
> ffff800008ab8a18: 8b14035a add x26, x26, x20
> ffff800008ab8a1c: b5000360 cbnz x0,
> ffff800008ab8a88 <read_zero+0x180>
> ffff800008ab8a20: f9400320 ldr x0, [x25]
> ffff800008ab8a24: cb140273 sub x19, x19, x20
> .
> .
> .
>
> This begs the question what perf enhancements could be added to make
> ARM64 kernel instruction trace easier to use? The process I’ve followed
> is cumbersome, but could be done behind the scenes by perf. The caveat
> is it requires a vmlinux which might not be available to an end user.
> Here are 2 options.
>
> 1. 'perf report -kcore'could use the process I’ve used here
> transparently in the background. The plus side is the objdump feature of
> mixed disassembly is available based on the current vmlinux.
>
Hi Steve,
What you're saying makes sense to me. I think #1 sounds best, I'm not
sure of the use-case where you wanted to make actionable decisions from
the trace but wouldn't have vmlinux available? Maybe an end-user could
be missing it, but I can only imagine use cases where you are actively
building and developing the kernel.
> 2. 'perf report -kcore' generates an ELF + symbols file based on
> kallsyms (and/or System.map). No vmlinux patching, so intermixed source
> and disassembly wouldn’t be available. It’s a reasonable alternative
> without relying on vmlinux.
>
> It makes sense performance-wise to use an ARM64 disassembler directly
> through perf. perf-script use of the arm-cs-trace-disasm.py python
> script can be slow. I’m unfamiliar with the Intel implementation, but
> perf-annotate uses objdump. Unfortunately, I can't seem to get annotate
> to work for me. A patch operation is still be required if vmlinux is used.
>
We have had other reports about arm-cs-trace-disasm.py being slow. I had
a plan to make it work with disassembly directly from Perf as that is
available in other modes. For example the annotate mode in perf already
works on Arm. What error are you getting with it exactly? It might
require installation of the aarch64 objdump tool if you are running on
x86, or provide the --objdump option?
> I suspect the CoreSight/perf communities are aware of these issues.
> Is there any ongoing work not known to the outside world?
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Steve C.