Andrii reports that bpf selftests relying on "struct btf_ptr" and BTF_F_*
values will not build as vmlinux.h for older kernels will not include
"struct btf_ptr" or the BTF_F_* enum values. Undefine and redefine
them to work around this.
Fixes: b72091bd4ee4 ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_seq_printf_btf helper")
Fixes: 076a95f5aff2 ("selftests/bpf: Add bpf_snprintf_btf helper tests")
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_ptr.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_ptr.h
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h
index df682af..6a12554 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h
@@ -14,6 +14,11 @@
#define bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem___not_used
#define bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map___not_used
#define bpf_iter__sockmap bpf_iter__sockmap___not_used
+#define btf_ptr btf_ptr___not_used
+#define BTF_F_COMPACT BTF_F_COMPACT___not_used
+#define BTF_F_NONAME BTF_F_NONAME___not_used
+#define BTF_F_PTR_RAW BTF_F_PTR_RAW___not_used
+#define BTF_F_ZERO BTF_F_ZERO___not_used
#include "vmlinux.h"
#undef bpf_iter_meta
#undef bpf_iter__bpf_map
@@ -28,6 +33,11 @@
#undef bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem
#undef bpf_iter__bpf_sk_storage_map
#undef bpf_iter__sockmap
+#undef btf_ptr
+#undef BTF_F_COMPACT
+#undef BTF_F_NONAME
+#undef BTF_F_PTR_RAW
+#undef BTF_F_ZERO
struct bpf_iter_meta {
struct seq_file *seq;
@@ -105,3 +115,16 @@ struct bpf_iter__sockmap {
void *key;
struct sock *sk;
};
+
+struct btf_ptr {
+ void *ptr;
+ __u32 type_id;
+ __u32 flags;
+};
+
+enum {
+ BTF_F_COMPACT = (1ULL << 0),
+ BTF_F_NONAME = (1ULL << 1),
+ BTF_F_PTR_RAW = (1ULL << 2),
+ BTF_F_ZERO = (1ULL << 3),
+};
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_ptr.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_ptr.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..c3c9797
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_ptr.h
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/* Copyright (c) 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates. */
+/* "undefine" structs in vmlinux.h, because we "override" them below */
+#define btf_ptr btf_ptr___not_used
+#define BTF_F_COMPACT BTF_F_COMPACT___not_used
+#define BTF_F_NONAME BTF_F_NONAME___not_used
+#define BTF_F_PTR_RAW BTF_F_PTR_RAW___not_used
+#define BTF_F_ZERO BTF_F_ZERO___not_used
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#undef btf_ptr
+#undef BTF_F_COMPACT
+#undef BTF_F_NONAME
+#undef BTF_F_PTR_RAW
+#undef BTF_F_ZERO
+
+struct btf_ptr {
+ void *ptr;
+ __u32 type_id;
+ __u32 flags;
+};
+
+enum {
+ BTF_F_COMPACT = (1ULL << 0),
+ BTF_F_NONAME = (1ULL << 1),
+ BTF_F_PTR_RAW = (1ULL << 2),
+ BTF_F_ZERO = (1ULL << 3),
+};
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c
index b873d80..6b67003 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
/* Copyright (c) 2020, Oracle and/or its affiliates. */
-#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include "btf_ptr.h"
#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
#include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h>
--
1.8.3.1
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 5:26 AM Alan Maguire <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Andrii reports that bpf selftests relying on "struct btf_ptr" and BTF_F_*
> values will not build as vmlinux.h for older kernels will not include
> "struct btf_ptr" or the BTF_F_* enum values. Undefine and redefine
> them to work around this.
>
> Fixes: b72091bd4ee4 ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_seq_printf_btf helper")
> Fixes: 076a95f5aff2 ("selftests/bpf: Add bpf_snprintf_btf helper tests")
> Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]>
> ---
That works, thanks!
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_iter.h | 23 ++++++++++++++++++
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_ptr.h | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../selftests/bpf/progs/netif_receive_skb.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/btf_ptr.h
>
[...]