2020-11-27 16:33:48

by Tom Rix

Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: remove trailing semicolon in macro definition

From: Tom Rix <[email protected]>

The macro use will already have a semicolon.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
index e67cec8fa2aa..ef767f04c37c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void intel_device_info_print_static(const struct intel_device_info *info,
drm_printf(p, "ppgtt-type: %d\n", info->ppgtt_type);
drm_printf(p, "dma_mask_size: %u\n", info->dma_mask_size);

-#define PRINT_FLAG(name) drm_printf(p, "%s: %s\n", #name, yesno(info->name));
+#define PRINT_FLAG(name) drm_printf(p, "%s: %s\n", #name, yesno(info->name))
DEV_INFO_FOR_EACH_FLAG(PRINT_FLAG);
#undef PRINT_FLAG

--
2.18.4

2020-11-27 21:17:30

by Chris Wilson

Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: remove trailing semicolon in macro definition

Quoting [email protected] (2020-11-27 16:28:28)
> From: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
>
> The macro use will already have a semicolon.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> index e67cec8fa2aa..ef767f04c37c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c
> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void intel_device_info_print_static(const struct intel_device_info *info,
> drm_printf(p, "ppgtt-type: %d\n", info->ppgtt_type);
> drm_printf(p, "dma_mask_size: %u\n", info->dma_mask_size);
>
> -#define PRINT_FLAG(name) drm_printf(p, "%s: %s\n", #name, yesno(info->name));
> +#define PRINT_FLAG(name) drm_printf(p, "%s: %s\n", #name, yesno(info->name))
> DEV_INFO_FOR_EACH_FLAG(PRINT_FLAG);

I thought that this was a macro that avoided adding the ';' to each
invocation. Perhaps another time.

Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
-Chris