I thought we had an agreement for a long time already that the use of
dma64_addr_t in the sym53c8xx_2 driver was wrong, but it's still
there.
Thanks,
--david
diff -Nru a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c
--- a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c Wed Jun 18 13:32:51 2003
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_glue.c Wed Jun 18 13:32:51 2003
@@ -295,11 +295,7 @@
#ifndef SYM_LINUX_DYNAMIC_DMA_MAPPING
typedef u_long bus_addr_t;
#else
-#if SYM_CONF_DMA_ADDRESSING_MODE > 0
-typedef dma64_addr_t bus_addr_t;
-#else
typedef dma_addr_t bus_addr_t;
-#endif
#endif
/*