From: Menglong Dong <[email protected]>
This 'BPF_ADD' is duplicated, and I belive it should be 'BPF_AND'.
Fixes: 981f94c3e921 ("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <[email protected]>
---
kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
index 19ff8fed7f4b..3acc7e0b6916 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
insn->dst_reg,
insn->off, insn->src_reg);
else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
- (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_ADD ||
+ (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_AND ||
insn->imm == BPF_OR || insn->imm == BPF_XOR)) {
verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) %s r%d\n",
insn->code,
--
2.25.1
Thanks!
On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 at 03:25, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Menglong Dong <[email protected]>
>
> This 'BPF_ADD' is duplicated, and I belive it should be 'BPF_AND'.
>
> Fixes: 981f94c3e921 ("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <[email protected]>
> ---
> kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
> index 19ff8fed7f4b..3acc7e0b6916 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c
> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs,
> insn->dst_reg,
> insn->off, insn->src_reg);
> else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC &&
> - (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_ADD ||
> + (insn->imm == BPF_ADD || insn->imm == BPF_AND ||
> insn->imm == BPF_OR || insn->imm == BPF_XOR)) {
> verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) lock *(%s *)(r%d %+d) %s r%d\n",
> insn->code,
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 18:25:07 -0800 you wrote:
> From: Menglong Dong <[email protected]>
>
> This 'BPF_ADD' is duplicated, and I belive it should be 'BPF_AND'.
>
> Fixes: 981f94c3e921 ("bpf: Add bitwise atomic instructions")
> Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <[email protected]>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] bpf: change 'BPF_ADD' to 'BPF_AND' in print_bpf_insn()
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/60e578e82b7d
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html