I have a system at work that seems to have an ext3 filesystem made
with -T largefile when it really shouldn't have and is running low on
inodes. A co-worker has mentioned that reiserfs doesn't have inode
problems. I tried to look this up but am having problems
verifying/denying this:
{0}:Documentation>host http://www.reiserfs.org
http://www.reiserfs.org does not exist, try again
Whois also doesn't return anything. Anyone have any proof either way
and news on the current stability of reiserfs in the 2.4.21 tree?
Robert
:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
@ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
DISCLAIMER:
These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
Diagnosis: witzelsucht
IPv6 = [email protected] http://ipv6.rdlg.net
IPv4 = [email protected] http://www.rdlg.net
Robert L. Harris writes:
>
>
> I have a system at work that seems to have an ext3 filesystem made
> with -T largefile when it really shouldn't have and is running low on
> inodes. A co-worker has mentioned that reiserfs doesn't have inode
> problems. I tried to look this up but am having problems
> verifying/denying this:
>
> {0}:Documentation>host http://www.reiserfs.org
> http://www.reiserfs.org does not exist, try again
$ host http://www.reiserfs.org
http://www.reiserfs.org has address 212.16.7.65
(you can also use namesys.com)
>
> Whois also doesn't return anything. Anyone have any proof either way
> and news on the current stability of reiserfs in the 2.4.21 tree?
It exists and is stable.
>
> Robert
>
Nikita.
>
Robert L. Harris wrote:
> I have a system at work that seems to have an ext3 filesystem made
>with -T largefile when it really shouldn't have and is running low on
>inodes. A co-worker has mentioned that reiserfs doesn't have inode
>problems. I tried to look this up but am having problems
>verifying/denying this:
>
>{0}:Documentation>host http://www.reiserfs.org
>http://www.reiserfs.org does not exist, try again
>
>Whois also doesn't return anything. Anyone have any proof either way
>and news on the current stability of reiserfs in the 2.4.21 tree?
>
>Robert
>
>
>:wq!
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
> @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
>DISCLAIMER:
> These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
>
>Diagnosis: witzelsucht
>
>IPv6 = [email protected] http://ipv6.rdlg.net
>IPv4 = [email protected] http://www.rdlg.net
>
>
inodes are yucky yucky.;-) We ain't got none.
--
Hans
Try http://www.namesys.com
Robert L. Harris wrote:
> I have a system at work that seems to have an ext3 filesystem made
>with -T largefile when it really shouldn't have and is running low on
>inodes. A co-worker has mentioned that reiserfs doesn't have inode
>problems. I tried to look this up but am having problems
>verifying/denying this:
>
>{0}:Documentation>host http://www.reiserfs.org
>http://www.reiserfs.org does not exist, try again
>
>Whois also doesn't return anything. Anyone have any proof either way
>and news on the current stability of reiserfs in the 2.4.21 tree?
>
>Robert
>
>
>:wq!
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Robert L. Harris | GPG Key ID: E344DA3B
> @ x-hkp://pgp.mit.edu
>DISCLAIMER:
> These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else.
>
>Diagnosis: witzelsucht
>
>IPv6 = [email protected] http://ipv6.rdlg.net
>IPv4 = [email protected] http://www.rdlg.net
>
>
--
Hans
Hans Reiser wrote:
> inodes are yucky yucky.;-) We ain't got none.
So are birthday problems and hash collisions, but I haven't seen you guys address that little detail yet...
(Speaking only as somebody who lost their /usr/local tree to reiserfs. KEEP BACKUPS, especially if you're using an experimental filesystem.)
--Gordon
[email protected] wrote:
>Hans Reiser wrote:
>
>
>
>>inodes are yucky yucky.;-) We ain't got none.
>>
>>
>
>So are birthday problems and hash collisions, but I haven't seen you guys address that little detail yet...
>
V4 handles duplicates, and has a larger hash.
>
>(Speaking only as somebody who lost their /usr/local tree to reiserfs. KEEP BACKUPS, especially if you're using an experimental filesystem.)
>
>
>
>
Sorry that happened to you. Were you using a kernel older than 2.4.18?
--
Hans