This series adds support for new SoC MT6873/8192 to the spmi driver.
This series is based on Weiyi's patches[1].
[1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/[email protected]/
changes since v5:
- fix the yaml error.
- refine the spmi-mtk-pmif driver for better code quality.
- fix the build error about MT8192.dtsi
Hsin-Hsiung Wang (4):
dt-bindings: spmi: modify the constraint 'maxItems' to 'minItems'
dt-bindings: spmi: document binding for the Mediatek SPMI controller
spmi: mediatek: Add support for MT6873/8192
arm64: dts: mt8192: add spmi node
.../bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml | 74 +++
.../devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml | 2 +-
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 17 +
drivers/spmi/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/spmi/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 488 ++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 591 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
--
2.18.0
Add spmi node to SOC MT8192.
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <[email protected]>
---
changes since v5:
- fix the build error of MT8192.dtsi.
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi | 17 +++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
index e12e024de122..5e002512441f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi
@@ -247,6 +247,23 @@
clock-names = "clk13m";
};
+ spmi: spmi@10027000 {
+ compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-spmi";
+ reg = <0 0x10027000 0 0x000e00>,
+ <0 0x10029000 0 0x000100>;
+ reg-names = "pmif", "spmimst";
+ clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_PMIC_AP>,
+ <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_PMIC_TMR>,
+ <&topckgen CLK_TOP_SPMI_MST_SEL>;
+ clock-names = "pmif_sys_ck",
+ "pmif_tmr_ck",
+ "spmimst_clk_mux";
+ assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_PWRAP_ULPOSC_SEL>;
+ assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_OSC_D10>;
+ #address-cells = <2>;
+ #size-cells = <0>;
+ };
+
uart0: serial@11002000 {
compatible = "mediatek,mt8192-uart",
"mediatek,mt6577-uart";
--
2.18.0
The constraint of 'maxItem: 1' might be larger than 1, so we modify it
to 'minItem: 1'.
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <[email protected]>
---
changes since v5:
- update the constraint of minItem to 1.
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml
index 173940930719..12dbf6567d16 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ properties:
pattern: "^spmi@.*"
reg:
- maxItems: 1
+ minItems: 1
"#address-cells":
const: 2
--
2.18.0
Add spmi support for MT6873/8192.
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <[email protected]>
---
changes since v5:
- add a newline at end of Makefile.
- refine the spmi-mtk-pmif driver for better code quality.
---
drivers/spmi/Kconfig | 9 +
drivers/spmi/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c | 488 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 499 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
index a53bad541f1a..418848840999 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
@@ -25,4 +25,13 @@ config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB
This is required for communicating with Qualcomm PMICs and
other devices that have the SPMI interface.
+config SPMI_MTK_PMIF
+ tristate "Mediatek SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)"
+ help
+ If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
+ built-in SPMI PMIC Arbiter interface on Mediatek family
+ processors.
+
+ This is required for communicating with Mediatek PMICs and
+ other devices that have the SPMI interface.
endif
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Makefile b/drivers/spmi/Makefile
index 55a94cadeffe..76fb3b3ab510 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/spmi/Makefile
@@ -5,3 +5,5 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI) += spmi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB) += spmi-pmic-arb.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SPMI_MTK_PMIF) += spmi-mtk-pmif.o
+
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4ac4643f89f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
@@ -0,0 +1,488 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+//
+// Copyright (c) 2021 MediaTek Inc.
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/spmi.h>
+
+#define SWINF_IDLE 0x00
+#define SWINF_WFVLDCLR 0x06
+
+#define GET_SWINF(x) (((x) >> 1) & 0x7)
+
+#define PMIF_CMD_REG_0 0
+#define PMIF_CMD_REG 1
+#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG 2
+#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG 3
+
+#define PMIF_DELAY_US 10
+#define PMIF_TIMEOUT_US (10 * 1000)
+
+#define PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET 0x5
+
+#define PMIF_MAX_CLKS 3
+
+#define SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY 1
+
+struct ch_reg {
+ u32 ch_sta;
+ u32 wdata;
+ u32 rdata;
+ u32 ch_send;
+ u32 ch_rdy;
+};
+
+struct pmif_data {
+ const u32 *regs;
+ const u32 *spmimst_regs;
+ u32 soc_chan;
+};
+
+struct pmif {
+ void __iomem *base;
+ void __iomem *spmimst_base;
+ raw_spinlock_t lock;
+ struct ch_reg chan;
+ struct clk_bulk_data clks[PMIF_MAX_CLKS];
+ u32 nclks;
+ const struct pmif_data *data;
+};
+
+static const char * const pmif_clock_names[] = {
+ "pmif_sys_ck", "pmif_tmr_ck", "spmimst_clk_mux",
+};
+
+enum pmif_regs {
+ PMIF_INIT_DONE,
+ PMIF_INF_EN,
+ PMIF_ARB_EN,
+ PMIF_CMDISSUE_EN,
+ PMIF_TIMER_CTRL,
+ PMIF_SPI_MODE_CTRL,
+ PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_0,
+ PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_0,
+ PMIF_IRQ_CLR_0,
+ PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_1,
+ PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_1,
+ PMIF_IRQ_CLR_1,
+ PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_2,
+ PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_2,
+ PMIF_IRQ_CLR_2,
+ PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_3,
+ PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_3,
+ PMIF_IRQ_CLR_3,
+ PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_4,
+ PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_4,
+ PMIF_IRQ_CLR_4,
+ PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_0,
+ PMIF_WDT_FLAG_0,
+ PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_1,
+ PMIF_WDT_FLAG_1,
+ PMIF_SWINF_0_STA,
+ PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0,
+ PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0,
+ PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC,
+ PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR,
+ PMIF_SWINF_1_STA,
+ PMIF_SWINF_1_WDATA_31_0,
+ PMIF_SWINF_1_RDATA_31_0,
+ PMIF_SWINF_1_ACC,
+ PMIF_SWINF_1_VLD_CLR,
+ PMIF_SWINF_2_STA,
+ PMIF_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0,
+ PMIF_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0,
+ PMIF_SWINF_2_ACC,
+ PMIF_SWINF_2_VLD_CLR,
+ PMIF_SWINF_3_STA,
+ PMIF_SWINF_3_WDATA_31_0,
+ PMIF_SWINF_3_RDATA_31_0,
+ PMIF_SWINF_3_ACC,
+ PMIF_SWINF_3_VLD_CLR,
+};
+
+static const u32 mt6873_regs[] = {
+ [PMIF_INIT_DONE] = 0x0000,
+ [PMIF_INF_EN] = 0x0024,
+ [PMIF_ARB_EN] = 0x0150,
+ [PMIF_CMDISSUE_EN] = 0x03B4,
+ [PMIF_TIMER_CTRL] = 0x03E0,
+ [PMIF_SPI_MODE_CTRL] = 0x0400,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_0] = 0x0418,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_0] = 0x0420,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_0] = 0x0424,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_1] = 0x0428,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_1] = 0x0430,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_1] = 0x0434,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_2] = 0x0438,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_2] = 0x0440,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_2] = 0x0444,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_3] = 0x0448,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_3] = 0x0450,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_3] = 0x0454,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_4] = 0x0458,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_4] = 0x0460,
+ [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_4] = 0x0464,
+ [PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_0] = 0x046C,
+ [PMIF_WDT_FLAG_0] = 0x0470,
+ [PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_1] = 0x0474,
+ [PMIF_WDT_FLAG_1] = 0x0478,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC] = 0x0C00,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0C04,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0C14,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR] = 0x0C24,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_0_STA] = 0x0C28,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_1_ACC] = 0x0C40,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_1_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0C44,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_1_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0C54,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_1_VLD_CLR] = 0x0C64,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_1_STA] = 0x0C68,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_2_ACC] = 0x0C80,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0C84,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0C94,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_2_VLD_CLR] = 0x0CA4,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_2_STA] = 0x0CA8,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_3_ACC] = 0x0CC0,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_3_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0CC4,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_3_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0CD4,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_3_VLD_CLR] = 0x0CE4,
+ [PMIF_SWINF_3_STA] = 0x0CE8,
+};
+
+enum spmi_regs {
+ SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL,
+ SPMI_GRP_ID_EN,
+ SPMI_OP_ST_STA,
+ SPMI_MST_SAMPL,
+ SPMI_MST_REQ_EN,
+ SPMI_REC_CTRL,
+ SPMI_REC0,
+ SPMI_REC1,
+ SPMI_REC2,
+ SPMI_REC3,
+ SPMI_REC4,
+ SPMI_MST_DBG,
+};
+
+static const u32 mt6873_spmi_regs[] = {
+ [SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL] = 0x0000,
+ [SPMI_GRP_ID_EN] = 0x0004,
+ [SPMI_OP_ST_STA] = 0x0008,
+ [SPMI_MST_SAMPL] = 0x000c,
+ [SPMI_MST_REQ_EN] = 0x0010,
+ [SPMI_REC_CTRL] = 0x0040,
+ [SPMI_REC0] = 0x0044,
+ [SPMI_REC1] = 0x0048,
+ [SPMI_REC2] = 0x004c,
+ [SPMI_REC3] = 0x0050,
+ [SPMI_REC4] = 0x0054,
+ [SPMI_MST_DBG] = 0x00fc,
+};
+
+static u32 pmif_readl(struct pmif *arb, enum pmif_regs reg)
+{
+ return readl(arb->base + arb->data->regs[reg]);
+}
+
+static void pmif_writel(struct pmif *arb, u32 val, enum pmif_regs reg)
+{
+ writel(val, arb->base + arb->data->regs[reg]);
+}
+
+static void mtk_spmi_writel(struct pmif *arb, u32 val, enum spmi_regs reg)
+{
+ writel(val, arb->spmimst_base + arb->data->spmimst_regs[reg]);
+}
+
+static bool pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(struct pmif *arb)
+{
+ u32 reg_rdata;
+
+ reg_rdata = pmif_readl(arb, arb->chan.ch_sta);
+ return GET_SWINF(reg_rdata) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR;
+}
+
+static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
+{
+ struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+ u32 rdata, cmd;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Check for argument validation. */
+ if (sid & ~0xf) {
+ dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* Check the opcode */
+ if (opc < SPMI_CMD_RESET || opc > SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ cmd = opc - SPMI_CMD_RESET;
+
+ mtk_spmi_writel(arb, (cmd << 0x4) | sid, SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL);
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->spmimst_base + arb->data->spmimst_regs[SPMI_OP_ST_STA],
+ rdata, (rdata & SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY) == SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY,
+ PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "timeout, err = %d\n", ret);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+ u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
+{
+ struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+ struct ch_reg *inf_reg;
+ int ret;
+ u32 data, cmd;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /* Check for argument validation. */
+ if (sid & ~0xf) {
+ dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (len > 4) {
+ dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "pmif supports 1..4 bytes per trans, but:%zu requested", len);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (opc >= 0x60 && opc <= 0x7f)
+ opc = PMIF_CMD_REG;
+ else if ((opc >= 0x20 && opc <= 0x2f) || (opc >= 0x38 && opc <= 0x3f))
+ opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
+ else
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&arb->lock, flags);
+
+ /* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */
+ inf_reg = &arb->chan;
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
+ data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE,
+ PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ /* set channel ready if the data has transferred */
+ if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb))
+ pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
+ dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* Send the command. */
+ cmd = (opc << 30) | (sid << 24) | ((len - 1) << 16) | addr;
+ pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send);
+
+ /*
+ * Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be WFVLDCLR,
+ * read the data and clear the valid flag.
+ */
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
+ data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR,
+ PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_WFVLDCLR\n");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ data = pmif_readl(arb, inf_reg->rdata);
+ memcpy(buf, &data, len);
+ pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
+
+out:
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&arb->lock, flags);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int pmif_spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
+ u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
+{
+ struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+ struct ch_reg *inf_reg;
+ int ret;
+ u32 data, cmd;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ /* Check for argument validation. */
+ if (sid & ~0xf) {
+ dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (len > 4) {
+ dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "pmif supports 1..4 bytes per trans, but:%zu requested", len);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ /* Check the opcode */
+ if (opc >= 0x40 && opc <= 0x5F)
+ opc = PMIF_CMD_REG;
+ else if ((opc <= 0xF) || (opc >= 0x30 && opc <= 0x37))
+ opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
+ else if (opc >= 0x80)
+ opc = PMIF_CMD_REG_0;
+ else
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&arb->lock, flags);
+
+ /* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */
+ inf_reg = &arb->chan;
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
+ data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE,
+ PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
+ if (ret < 0) {
+ /* set channel ready if the data has transferred */
+ if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb))
+ pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
+ dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n");
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /* Set the write data. */
+ memcpy(&data, buf, len);
+ pmif_writel(arb, data, inf_reg->wdata);
+
+ /* Send the command. */
+ cmd = (opc << 30) | BIT(29) | (sid << 24) | ((len - 1) << 16) | addr;
+ pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send);
+
+out:
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&arb->lock, flags);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct pmif_data mt6873_pmif_arb = {
+ .regs = mt6873_regs,
+ .spmimst_regs = mt6873_spmi_regs,
+ .soc_chan = 2,
+};
+
+static int mtk_spmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct pmif *arb;
+ struct spmi_controller *ctrl;
+ int err, i;
+ u32 chan_offset;
+
+ ctrl = spmi_controller_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*arb));
+ if (!ctrl)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+ arb->data = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);
+ if (!arb->data) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot get drv_data\n");
+ goto err_put_ctrl;
+ }
+
+ arb->base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "pmif");
+ if (IS_ERR(arb->base)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(arb->base);
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pmif failed to get the remappped memory\n");
+ goto err_put_ctrl;
+ }
+
+ arb->spmimst_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "spmimst");
+ if (IS_ERR(arb->spmimst_base)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(arb->spmimst_base);
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "spmimst failed to get the remappped memory\n");
+ goto err_put_ctrl;
+ }
+
+ arb->nclks = ARRAY_SIZE(pmif_clock_names);
+ if (arb->nclks > PMIF_MAX_CLKS) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "exceed the max clock numbers\n");
+ goto err_put_ctrl;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < arb->nclks; i++)
+ arb->clks[i].id = pmif_clock_names[i];
+
+ err = devm_clk_bulk_get(&pdev->dev, arb->nclks, arb->clks);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get clocks: %d\n", err);
+ goto err_put_ctrl;
+ }
+
+ err = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(arb->nclks, arb->clks);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to enable clocks: %d\n", err);
+ goto err_put_ctrl;
+ }
+
+ ctrl->cmd = pmif_arb_cmd;
+ ctrl->read_cmd = pmif_spmi_read_cmd;
+ ctrl->write_cmd = pmif_spmi_write_cmd;
+
+ chan_offset = PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET * arb->data->soc_chan;
+ arb->chan.ch_sta = PMIF_SWINF_0_STA + chan_offset;
+ arb->chan.wdata = PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0 + chan_offset;
+ arb->chan.rdata = PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0 + chan_offset;
+ arb->chan.ch_send = PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC + chan_offset;
+ arb->chan.ch_rdy = PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR + chan_offset;
+
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&arb->lock);
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ctrl);
+
+ err = spmi_controller_add(ctrl);
+ if (err)
+ goto err_domain_remove;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_domain_remove:
+ clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(arb->nclks, arb->clks);
+err_put_ctrl:
+ spmi_controller_put(ctrl);
+ return err;
+}
+
+static int mtk_spmi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct spmi_controller *ctrl = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
+
+ clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(arb->nclks, arb->clks);
+ spmi_controller_remove(ctrl);
+ spmi_controller_put(ctrl);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id mtk_spmi_match_table[] = {
+ {
+ .compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-spmi",
+ .data = &mt6873_pmif_arb,
+ }, {
+ /* sentinel */
+ },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_spmi_match_table);
+
+static struct platform_driver mtk_spmi_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "spmi-mtk",
+ .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mtk_spmi_match_table),
+ },
+ .probe = mtk_spmi_probe,
+ .remove = mtk_spmi_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(mtk_spmi_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Hsin-Hsiung Wang <[email protected]>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MediaTek SPMI Driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
--
2.18.0
This adds documentation for the SPMI controller found on Mediatek SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
---
changes since v5: no changes
---
.../bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a43b0302d503
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/spmi/mtk,spmi-mtk-pmif.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Mediatek SPMI Controller Device Tree Bindings
+
+maintainers:
+ - Hsin-Hsiung Wang <[email protected]>
+
+description: |+
+ On MediaTek SoCs the PMIC is connected via SPMI and the controller allows
+ for multiple SoCs to control a single SPMI master.
+
+allOf:
+ - $ref: "spmi.yaml"
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ const: mediatek,mt6873-spmi
+
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 2
+
+ reg-names:
+ items:
+ - const: pmif
+ - const: spmimst
+
+ clocks:
+ minItems: 3
+ maxItems: 3
+
+ clock-names:
+ items:
+ - const: pmif_sys_ck
+ - const: pmif_tmr_ck
+ - const: spmimst_clk_mux
+
+ assigned-clocks:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ assigned-clock-parents:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - reg-names
+ - clocks
+ - clock-names
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8192-clk.h>
+
+ spmi: spmi@10027000 {
+ compatible = "mediatek,mt6873-spmi";
+ reg = <0 0x10027000 0 0x000e00>,
+ <0 0x10029000 0 0x000100>;
+ reg-names = "pmif", "spmimst";
+ clocks = <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_PMIC_AP>,
+ <&infracfg CLK_INFRA_PMIC_TMR>,
+ <&topckgen CLK_TOP_SPMI_MST_SEL>;
+ clock-names = "pmif_sys_ck",
+ "pmif_tmr_ck",
+ "spmimst_clk_mux";
+ assigned-clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_PWRAP_ULPOSC_SEL>;
+ assigned-clock-parents = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_OSC_D10>;
+ };
+...
--
2.18.0
Quoting Hsin-Hsiung Wang (2021-02-06 21:19:13)
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> index a53bad541f1a..418848840999 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> @@ -25,4 +25,13 @@ config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB
> This is required for communicating with Qualcomm PMICs and
> other devices that have the SPMI interface.
>
> +config SPMI_MTK_PMIF
> + tristate "Mediatek SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)"
> + help
> + If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
> + built-in SPMI PMIC Arbiter interface on Mediatek family
> + processors.
> +
> + This is required for communicating with Mediatek PMICs and
> + other devices that have the SPMI interface.
Preferably add another newline here to unstick the 'endif'
> endif
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4ac4643f89f3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,488 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +//
> +// Copyright (c) 2021 MediaTek Inc.
> +
> +#include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/spmi.h>
> +
> +#define SWINF_IDLE 0x00
> +#define SWINF_WFVLDCLR 0x06
> +
> +#define GET_SWINF(x) (((x) >> 1) & 0x7)
> +
> +#define PMIF_CMD_REG_0 0
> +#define PMIF_CMD_REG 1
> +#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG 2
> +#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG 3
> +
> +#define PMIF_DELAY_US 10
> +#define PMIF_TIMEOUT_US (10 * 1000)
> +
> +#define PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET 0x5
> +
> +#define PMIF_MAX_CLKS 3
> +
> +#define SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY 1
> +
> +struct ch_reg {
> + u32 ch_sta;
> + u32 wdata;
> + u32 rdata;
> + u32 ch_send;
> + u32 ch_rdy;
> +};
> +
> +struct pmif_data {
> + const u32 *regs;
> + const u32 *spmimst_regs;
> + u32 soc_chan;
Is this used?
> +};
> +
> +struct pmif {
> + void __iomem *base;
> + void __iomem *spmimst_base;
> + raw_spinlock_t lock;
Why is the spinlock raw? Is it used in hard irq handling?
> + struct ch_reg chan;
> + struct clk_bulk_data clks[PMIF_MAX_CLKS];
> + u32 nclks;
> + const struct pmif_data *data;
> +};
> +
> +static const char * const pmif_clock_names[] = {
> + "pmif_sys_ck", "pmif_tmr_ck", "spmimst_clk_mux",
> +};
> +
> +enum pmif_regs {
> + PMIF_INIT_DONE,
> + PMIF_INF_EN,
> + PMIF_ARB_EN,
> + PMIF_CMDISSUE_EN,
> + PMIF_TIMER_CTRL,
> + PMIF_SPI_MODE_CTRL,
> + PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_0,
> + PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_0,
> + PMIF_IRQ_CLR_0,
> + PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_1,
> + PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_1,
> + PMIF_IRQ_CLR_1,
> + PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_2,
> + PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_2,
> + PMIF_IRQ_CLR_2,
> + PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_3,
> + PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_3,
> + PMIF_IRQ_CLR_3,
> + PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_4,
> + PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_4,
> + PMIF_IRQ_CLR_4,
> + PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_0,
> + PMIF_WDT_FLAG_0,
> + PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_1,
> + PMIF_WDT_FLAG_1,
> + PMIF_SWINF_0_STA,
> + PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0,
> + PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0,
> + PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC,
> + PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR,
> + PMIF_SWINF_1_STA,
> + PMIF_SWINF_1_WDATA_31_0,
> + PMIF_SWINF_1_RDATA_31_0,
> + PMIF_SWINF_1_ACC,
> + PMIF_SWINF_1_VLD_CLR,
> + PMIF_SWINF_2_STA,
> + PMIF_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0,
> + PMIF_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0,
> + PMIF_SWINF_2_ACC,
> + PMIF_SWINF_2_VLD_CLR,
> + PMIF_SWINF_3_STA,
> + PMIF_SWINF_3_WDATA_31_0,
> + PMIF_SWINF_3_RDATA_31_0,
> + PMIF_SWINF_3_ACC,
> + PMIF_SWINF_3_VLD_CLR,
> +};
> +
> +static const u32 mt6873_regs[] = {
> + [PMIF_INIT_DONE] = 0x0000,
> + [PMIF_INF_EN] = 0x0024,
> + [PMIF_ARB_EN] = 0x0150,
> + [PMIF_CMDISSUE_EN] = 0x03B4,
> + [PMIF_TIMER_CTRL] = 0x03E0,
> + [PMIF_SPI_MODE_CTRL] = 0x0400,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_0] = 0x0418,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_0] = 0x0420,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_0] = 0x0424,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_1] = 0x0428,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_1] = 0x0430,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_1] = 0x0434,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_2] = 0x0438,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_2] = 0x0440,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_2] = 0x0444,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_3] = 0x0448,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_3] = 0x0450,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_3] = 0x0454,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_4] = 0x0458,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_4] = 0x0460,
> + [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_4] = 0x0464,
> + [PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_0] = 0x046C,
> + [PMIF_WDT_FLAG_0] = 0x0470,
> + [PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_1] = 0x0474,
> + [PMIF_WDT_FLAG_1] = 0x0478,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC] = 0x0C00,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0C04,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0C14,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR] = 0x0C24,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_0_STA] = 0x0C28,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_1_ACC] = 0x0C40,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_1_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0C44,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_1_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0C54,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_1_VLD_CLR] = 0x0C64,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_1_STA] = 0x0C68,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_2_ACC] = 0x0C80,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0C84,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0C94,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_2_VLD_CLR] = 0x0CA4,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_2_STA] = 0x0CA8,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_3_ACC] = 0x0CC0,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_3_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0CC4,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_3_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0CD4,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_3_VLD_CLR] = 0x0CE4,
> + [PMIF_SWINF_3_STA] = 0x0CE8,
> +};
> +
> +enum spmi_regs {
> + SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL,
> + SPMI_GRP_ID_EN,
> + SPMI_OP_ST_STA,
> + SPMI_MST_SAMPL,
> + SPMI_MST_REQ_EN,
> + SPMI_REC_CTRL,
> + SPMI_REC0,
> + SPMI_REC1,
> + SPMI_REC2,
> + SPMI_REC3,
> + SPMI_REC4,
> + SPMI_MST_DBG,
> +};
> +
> +static const u32 mt6873_spmi_regs[] = {
There's only one of these so far. Is there going to be a different
register layout in the future? If we can avoid the indirection it would
be ideal.
> + [SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL] = 0x0000,
> + [SPMI_GRP_ID_EN] = 0x0004,
> + [SPMI_OP_ST_STA] = 0x0008,
> + [SPMI_MST_SAMPL] = 0x000c,
> + [SPMI_MST_REQ_EN] = 0x0010,
> + [SPMI_REC_CTRL] = 0x0040,
> + [SPMI_REC0] = 0x0044,
> + [SPMI_REC1] = 0x0048,
> + [SPMI_REC2] = 0x004c,
> + [SPMI_REC3] = 0x0050,
> + [SPMI_REC4] = 0x0054,
> + [SPMI_MST_DBG] = 0x00fc,
> +};
> +
> +static u32 pmif_readl(struct pmif *arb, enum pmif_regs reg)
> +{
> + return readl(arb->base + arb->data->regs[reg]);
> +}
> +
> +static void pmif_writel(struct pmif *arb, u32 val, enum pmif_regs reg)
> +{
> + writel(val, arb->base + arb->data->regs[reg]);
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_spmi_writel(struct pmif *arb, u32 val, enum spmi_regs reg)
> +{
> + writel(val, arb->spmimst_base + arb->data->spmimst_regs[reg]);
> +}
> +
> +static bool pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(struct pmif *arb)
> +{
> + u32 reg_rdata;
> +
> + reg_rdata = pmif_readl(arb, arb->chan.ch_sta);
> + return GET_SWINF(reg_rdata) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR;
> +}
> +
> +static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
> +{
> + struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> + u32 rdata, cmd;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Check for argument validation. */
> + if (sid & ~0xf) {
> + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check the opcode */
> + if (opc < SPMI_CMD_RESET || opc > SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + cmd = opc - SPMI_CMD_RESET;
> +
> + mtk_spmi_writel(arb, (cmd << 0x4) | sid, SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL);
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->spmimst_base + arb->data->spmimst_regs[SPMI_OP_ST_STA],
> + rdata, (rdata & SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY) == SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY,
> + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "timeout, err = %d\n", ret);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
> + u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> + struct ch_reg *inf_reg;
> + int ret;
> + u32 data, cmd;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /* Check for argument validation. */
> + if (sid & ~0xf) {
> + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (len > 4) {
> + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "pmif supports 1..4 bytes per trans, but:%zu requested", len);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (opc >= 0x60 && opc <= 0x7f)
> + opc = PMIF_CMD_REG;
> + else if ((opc >= 0x20 && opc <= 0x2f) || (opc >= 0x38 && opc <= 0x3f))
> + opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&arb->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */
> + inf_reg = &arb->chan;
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
> + data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE,
> + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + /* set channel ready if the data has transferred */
> + if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb))
> + pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
> + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Send the command. */
> + cmd = (opc << 30) | (sid << 24) | ((len - 1) << 16) | addr;
> + pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send);
> +
> + /*
> + * Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be WFVLDCLR,
> + * read the data and clear the valid flag.
> + */
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
> + data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR,
> + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_WFVLDCLR\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + data = pmif_readl(arb, inf_reg->rdata);
> + memcpy(buf, &data, len);
> + pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
> +
> +out:
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&arb->lock, flags);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int pmif_spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
> + u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> + struct ch_reg *inf_reg;
> + int ret;
> + u32 data, cmd;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /* Check for argument validation. */
> + if (sid & ~0xf) {
> + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
Feels like something we should push up into the core framework instead
of having each driver figure out.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + if (len > 4) {
> + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "pmif supports 1..4 bytes per trans, but:%zu requested", len);
Feels like something we should push up into the core framework instead
of having each driver figure out.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + /* Check the opcode */
> + if (opc >= 0x40 && opc <= 0x5F)
> + opc = PMIF_CMD_REG;
> + else if ((opc <= 0xF) || (opc >= 0x30 && opc <= 0x37))
> + opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
> + else if (opc >= 0x80)
> + opc = PMIF_CMD_REG_0;
> + else
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&arb->lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */
> + inf_reg = &arb->chan;
> + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
> + data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE,
> + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + /* set channel ready if the data has transferred */
> + if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb))
> + pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
> + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n");
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* Set the write data. */
> + memcpy(&data, buf, len);
> + pmif_writel(arb, data, inf_reg->wdata);
> +
> + /* Send the command. */
> + cmd = (opc << 30) | BIT(29) | (sid << 24) | ((len - 1) << 16) | addr;
> + pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send);
What is BIT 29? Is that special somehow?
> +
> +out:
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&arb->lock, flags);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
On Sun, 07 Feb 2021 13:19:11 +0800, Hsin-Hsiung Wang wrote:
> The constraint of 'maxItem: 1' might be larger than 1, so we modify it
> to 'minItem: 1'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <[email protected]>
> ---
> changes since v5:
> - update the constraint of minItem to 1.
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spmi/spmi.yaml | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Hi Hsin-Hsiung,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v5.11 next-20210215]
[cannot apply to mediatek/for-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Hsin-Hsiung-Wang/Add-SPMI-support-for-Mediatek-MT6873-8192-SoC-IC/20210207-132428
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
config: arm64-randconfig-r016-20210215 (attached as .config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/19ac525591748a952c6e6f536a12aeb6dd28193a
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Hsin-Hsiung-Wang/Add-SPMI-support-for-Mediatek-MT6873-8192-SoC-IC/20210207-132428
git checkout 19ac525591748a952c6e6f536a12aeb6dd28193a
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=arm64
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> Error: arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8192.dtsi:255.24-25 syntax error
>> FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/[email protected]
Hi,
On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 14:21 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Hsin-Hsiung Wang (2021-02-06 21:19:13)
> > diff --git a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> > index a53bad541f1a..418848840999 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/spmi/Kconfig
> > @@ -25,4 +25,13 @@ config SPMI_MSM_PMIC_ARB
> > This is required for communicating with Qualcomm PMICs and
> > other devices that have the SPMI interface.
> >
> > +config SPMI_MTK_PMIF
> > + tristate "Mediatek SPMI Controller (PMIC Arbiter)"
> > + help
> > + If you say yes to this option, support will be included for the
> > + built-in SPMI PMIC Arbiter interface on Mediatek family
> > + processors.
> > +
> > + This is required for communicating with Mediatek PMICs and
> > + other devices that have the SPMI interface.
>
> Preferably add another newline here to unstick the 'endif'
>
Thanks. I will update it in the next patch.
> > endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..4ac4643f89f3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-mtk-pmif.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,488 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +//
> > +// Copyright (c) 2021 MediaTek Inc.
> > +
> > +#include <linux/clk.h>
> > +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/spmi.h>
> > +
> > +#define SWINF_IDLE 0x00
> > +#define SWINF_WFVLDCLR 0x06
> > +
> > +#define GET_SWINF(x) (((x) >> 1) & 0x7)
> > +
> > +#define PMIF_CMD_REG_0 0
> > +#define PMIF_CMD_REG 1
> > +#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG 2
> > +#define PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG 3
> > +
> > +#define PMIF_DELAY_US 10
> > +#define PMIF_TIMEOUT_US (10 * 1000)
> > +
> > +#define PMIF_CHAN_OFFSET 0x5
> > +
> > +#define PMIF_MAX_CLKS 3
> > +
> > +#define SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY 1
> > +
> > +struct ch_reg {
> > + u32 ch_sta;
> > + u32 wdata;
> > + u32 rdata;
> > + u32 ch_send;
> > + u32 ch_rdy;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct pmif_data {
> > + const u32 *regs;
> > + const u32 *spmimst_regs;
> > + u32 soc_chan;
>
> Is this used?
>
Yes.
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct pmif {
> > + void __iomem *base;
> > + void __iomem *spmimst_base;
> > + raw_spinlock_t lock;
>
> Why is the spinlock raw? Is it used in hard irq handling?
>
Thanks for the comment. After reviewing the code, I will remove it and
update it in the next patch.
> > + struct ch_reg chan;
> > + struct clk_bulk_data clks[PMIF_MAX_CLKS];
> > + u32 nclks;
> > + const struct pmif_data *data;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const char * const pmif_clock_names[] = {
> > + "pmif_sys_ck", "pmif_tmr_ck", "spmimst_clk_mux",
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum pmif_regs {
> > + PMIF_INIT_DONE,
> > + PMIF_INF_EN,
> > + PMIF_ARB_EN,
> > + PMIF_CMDISSUE_EN,
> > + PMIF_TIMER_CTRL,
> > + PMIF_SPI_MODE_CTRL,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_0,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_0,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_CLR_0,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_1,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_1,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_CLR_1,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_2,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_2,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_CLR_2,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_3,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_3,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_CLR_3,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_4,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_4,
> > + PMIF_IRQ_CLR_4,
> > + PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_0,
> > + PMIF_WDT_FLAG_0,
> > + PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_1,
> > + PMIF_WDT_FLAG_1,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_0_STA,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_1_STA,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_1_WDATA_31_0,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_1_RDATA_31_0,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_1_ACC,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_1_VLD_CLR,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_2_STA,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_2_ACC,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_2_VLD_CLR,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_3_STA,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_3_WDATA_31_0,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_3_RDATA_31_0,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_3_ACC,
> > + PMIF_SWINF_3_VLD_CLR,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const u32 mt6873_regs[] = {
> > + [PMIF_INIT_DONE] = 0x0000,
> > + [PMIF_INF_EN] = 0x0024,
> > + [PMIF_ARB_EN] = 0x0150,
> > + [PMIF_CMDISSUE_EN] = 0x03B4,
> > + [PMIF_TIMER_CTRL] = 0x03E0,
> > + [PMIF_SPI_MODE_CTRL] = 0x0400,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_0] = 0x0418,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_0] = 0x0420,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_0] = 0x0424,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_1] = 0x0428,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_1] = 0x0430,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_1] = 0x0434,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_2] = 0x0438,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_2] = 0x0440,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_2] = 0x0444,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_3] = 0x0448,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_3] = 0x0450,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_3] = 0x0454,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_EVENT_EN_4] = 0x0458,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_FLAG_4] = 0x0460,
> > + [PMIF_IRQ_CLR_4] = 0x0464,
> > + [PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_0] = 0x046C,
> > + [PMIF_WDT_FLAG_0] = 0x0470,
> > + [PMIF_WDT_EVENT_EN_1] = 0x0474,
> > + [PMIF_WDT_FLAG_1] = 0x0478,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_0_ACC] = 0x0C00,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_0_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0C04,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_0_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0C14,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_0_VLD_CLR] = 0x0C24,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_0_STA] = 0x0C28,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_1_ACC] = 0x0C40,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_1_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0C44,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_1_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0C54,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_1_VLD_CLR] = 0x0C64,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_1_STA] = 0x0C68,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_2_ACC] = 0x0C80,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_2_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0C84,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_2_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0C94,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_2_VLD_CLR] = 0x0CA4,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_2_STA] = 0x0CA8,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_3_ACC] = 0x0CC0,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_3_WDATA_31_0] = 0x0CC4,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_3_RDATA_31_0] = 0x0CD4,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_3_VLD_CLR] = 0x0CE4,
> > + [PMIF_SWINF_3_STA] = 0x0CE8,
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum spmi_regs {
> > + SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL,
> > + SPMI_GRP_ID_EN,
> > + SPMI_OP_ST_STA,
> > + SPMI_MST_SAMPL,
> > + SPMI_MST_REQ_EN,
> > + SPMI_REC_CTRL,
> > + SPMI_REC0,
> > + SPMI_REC1,
> > + SPMI_REC2,
> > + SPMI_REC3,
> > + SPMI_REC4,
> > + SPMI_MST_DBG,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const u32 mt6873_spmi_regs[] = {
>
> There's only one of these so far. Is there going to be a different
> register layout in the future? If we can avoid the indirection it would
> be ideal.
>
Yes, we have other chips with different registers for spmi driver in the
feature.
> > + [SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL] = 0x0000,
> > + [SPMI_GRP_ID_EN] = 0x0004,
> > + [SPMI_OP_ST_STA] = 0x0008,
> > + [SPMI_MST_SAMPL] = 0x000c,
> > + [SPMI_MST_REQ_EN] = 0x0010,
> > + [SPMI_REC_CTRL] = 0x0040,
> > + [SPMI_REC0] = 0x0044,
> > + [SPMI_REC1] = 0x0048,
> > + [SPMI_REC2] = 0x004c,
> > + [SPMI_REC3] = 0x0050,
> > + [SPMI_REC4] = 0x0054,
> > + [SPMI_MST_DBG] = 0x00fc,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static u32 pmif_readl(struct pmif *arb, enum pmif_regs reg)
> > +{
> > + return readl(arb->base + arb->data->regs[reg]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void pmif_writel(struct pmif *arb, u32 val, enum pmif_regs reg)
> > +{
> > + writel(val, arb->base + arb->data->regs[reg]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void mtk_spmi_writel(struct pmif *arb, u32 val, enum spmi_regs reg)
> > +{
> > + writel(val, arb->spmimst_base + arb->data->spmimst_regs[reg]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(struct pmif *arb)
> > +{
> > + u32 reg_rdata;
> > +
> > + reg_rdata = pmif_readl(arb, arb->chan.ch_sta);
> > + return GET_SWINF(reg_rdata) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pmif_arb_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid)
> > +{
> > + struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> > + u32 rdata, cmd;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* Check for argument validation. */
> > + if (sid & ~0xf) {
> > + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Check the opcode */
> > + if (opc < SPMI_CMD_RESET || opc > SPMI_CMD_WAKEUP)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + cmd = opc - SPMI_CMD_RESET;
> > +
> > + mtk_spmi_writel(arb, (cmd << 0x4) | sid, SPMI_OP_ST_CTRL);
> > + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->spmimst_base + arb->data->spmimst_regs[SPMI_OP_ST_STA],
> > + rdata, (rdata & SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY) == SPMI_OP_ST_BUSY,
> > + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "timeout, err = %d\n", ret);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pmif_spmi_read_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
> > + u16 addr, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> > + struct ch_reg *inf_reg;
> > + int ret;
> > + u32 data, cmd;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + /* Check for argument validation. */
> > + if (sid & ~0xf) {
> > + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (len > 4) {
> > + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "pmif supports 1..4 bytes per trans, but:%zu requested", len);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (opc >= 0x60 && opc <= 0x7f)
> > + opc = PMIF_CMD_REG;
> > + else if ((opc >= 0x20 && opc <= 0x2f) || (opc >= 0x38 && opc <= 0x3f))
> > + opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
> > + else
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&arb->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + /* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */
> > + inf_reg = &arb->chan;
> > + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
> > + data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE,
> > + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + /* set channel ready if the data has transferred */
> > + if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb))
> > + pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
> > + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n");
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Send the command. */
> > + cmd = (opc << 30) | (sid << 24) | ((len - 1) << 16) | addr;
> > + pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be WFVLDCLR,
> > + * read the data and clear the valid flag.
> > + */
> > + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
> > + data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_WFVLDCLR,
> > + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_WFVLDCLR\n");
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + data = pmif_readl(arb, inf_reg->rdata);
> > + memcpy(buf, &data, len);
> > + pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
> > +
> > +out:
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&arb->lock, flags);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int pmif_spmi_write_cmd(struct spmi_controller *ctrl, u8 opc, u8 sid,
> > + u16 addr, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + struct pmif *arb = spmi_controller_get_drvdata(ctrl);
> > + struct ch_reg *inf_reg;
> > + int ret;
> > + u32 data, cmd;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + /* Check for argument validation. */
> > + if (sid & ~0xf) {
> > + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "exceed the max slv id\n");
>
> Feels like something we should push up into the core framework instead
> of having each driver figure out.
>
Thanks for the review.
After checking the framework, it already has the same check, so I will remove it in the next patch.
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (len > 4) {
> > + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "pmif supports 1..4 bytes per trans, but:%zu requested", len);
>
> Feels like something we should push up into the core framework instead
> of having each driver figure out.
>
Thanks for the comment, it's our hw design, not for common driver.
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Check the opcode */
> > + if (opc >= 0x40 && opc <= 0x5F)
> > + opc = PMIF_CMD_REG;
> > + else if ((opc <= 0xF) || (opc >= 0x30 && opc <= 0x37))
> > + opc = PMIF_CMD_EXT_REG_LONG;
> > + else if (opc >= 0x80)
> > + opc = PMIF_CMD_REG_0;
> > + else
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&arb->lock, flags);
> > +
> > + /* Wait for Software Interface FSM state to be IDLE. */
> > + inf_reg = &arb->chan;
> > + ret = readl_poll_timeout_atomic(arb->base + arb->data->regs[inf_reg->ch_sta],
> > + data, GET_SWINF(data) == SWINF_IDLE,
> > + PMIF_DELAY_US, PMIF_TIMEOUT_US);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + /* set channel ready if the data has transferred */
> > + if (pmif_is_fsm_vldclr(arb))
> > + pmif_writel(arb, 1, inf_reg->ch_rdy);
> > + dev_err(&ctrl->dev, "failed to wait for SWINF_IDLE\n");
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Set the write data. */
> > + memcpy(&data, buf, len);
> > + pmif_writel(arb, data, inf_reg->wdata);
> > +
> > + /* Send the command. */
> > + cmd = (opc << 30) | BIT(29) | (sid << 24) | ((len - 1) << 16) | addr;
> > + pmif_writel(arb, cmd, inf_reg->ch_send);
>
> What is BIT 29? Is that special somehow?
>
Bit 29 means write or read cmd.
1 for write and 0 for read.
> > +
> > +out:
> > + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&arb->lock, flags);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +