2021-02-22 08:56:25

by Shengjiu Wang

Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Add pm qos cpu latency support

On SoCs such as i.MX7ULP, cpuidle has some levels which
may disable system/bus clocks, so need to add pm_qos to
prevent cpuidle from entering low level idles and make sure
system/bus clocks are enabled when sai is active.

Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c | 12 ++++++++++++
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
index 5e65b456d3e2..a22679dea578 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/pm_qos.h>
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -1177,6 +1178,7 @@ static const struct fsl_sai_soc_data fsl_sai_vf610_data = {
.fifo_depth = 32,
.reg_offset = 0,
.mclk0_is_mclk1 = false,
+ .flags = 0,
};

static const struct fsl_sai_soc_data fsl_sai_imx6sx_data = {
@@ -1185,6 +1187,7 @@ static const struct fsl_sai_soc_data fsl_sai_imx6sx_data = {
.fifo_depth = 32,
.reg_offset = 0,
.mclk0_is_mclk1 = true,
+ .flags = 0,
};

static const struct fsl_sai_soc_data fsl_sai_imx7ulp_data = {
@@ -1193,6 +1196,7 @@ static const struct fsl_sai_soc_data fsl_sai_imx7ulp_data = {
.fifo_depth = 16,
.reg_offset = 8,
.mclk0_is_mclk1 = false,
+ .flags = PMQOS_CPU_LATENCY,
};

static const struct fsl_sai_soc_data fsl_sai_imx8mq_data = {
@@ -1201,6 +1205,7 @@ static const struct fsl_sai_soc_data fsl_sai_imx8mq_data = {
.fifo_depth = 128,
.reg_offset = 8,
.mclk0_is_mclk1 = false,
+ .flags = 0,
};

static const struct fsl_sai_soc_data fsl_sai_imx8qm_data = {
@@ -1209,6 +1214,7 @@ static const struct fsl_sai_soc_data fsl_sai_imx8qm_data = {
.fifo_depth = 64,
.reg_offset = 0,
.mclk0_is_mclk1 = false,
+ .flags = 0,
};

static const struct of_device_id fsl_sai_ids[] = {
@@ -1235,6 +1241,9 @@ static int fsl_sai_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)

clk_disable_unprepare(sai->bus_clk);

+ if (sai->soc_data->flags & PMQOS_CPU_LATENCY)
+ cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(&sai->pm_qos_req);
+
regcache_cache_only(sai->regmap, true);

return 0;
@@ -1264,6 +1273,9 @@ static int fsl_sai_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
goto disable_tx_clk;
}

+ if (sai->soc_data->flags & PMQOS_CPU_LATENCY)
+ cpu_latency_qos_add_request(&sai->pm_qos_req, 0);
+
regcache_cache_only(sai->regmap, false);
regcache_mark_dirty(sai->regmap);
regmap_write(sai->regmap, FSL_SAI_TCSR(ofs), FSL_SAI_CSR_SR);
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.h b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.h
index ff2619f1b214..bc60030967dd 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.h
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.h
@@ -216,12 +216,15 @@
#define FSL_SAI_MAXBURST_TX 6
#define FSL_SAI_MAXBURST_RX 6

+#define PMQOS_CPU_LATENCY BIT(0)
+
struct fsl_sai_soc_data {
bool use_imx_pcm;
bool use_edma;
bool mclk0_is_mclk1;
unsigned int fifo_depth;
unsigned int reg_offset;
+ unsigned int flags;
};

/**
@@ -273,6 +276,7 @@ struct fsl_sai {
struct snd_dmaengine_dai_dma_data dma_params_tx;
struct fsl_sai_verid verid;
struct fsl_sai_param param;
+ struct pm_qos_request pm_qos_req;
};

#define TX 1
--
2.27.0

2021-03-04 05:30:06

by Mark Brown

Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Add pm qos cpu latency support

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:40:20 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On SoCs such as i.MX7ULP, cpuidle has some levels which
> may disable system/bus clocks, so need to add pm_qos to
> prevent cpuidle from entering low level idles and make sure
> system/bus clocks are enabled when sai is active.

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: fsl_sai: Add pm qos cpu latency support
commit: 6d85d770c171972c0f33f74b84bf0fedc111e89f

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark