2021-03-17 06:49:12

by Jiapeng Chong

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] sched: replace if (cond) BUG() with BUG_ON()

Fix the following coccicheck warnings:

./arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c:908:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON
instead of if condition followed by BUG.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
index 3692064..139a6ec 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
@@ -904,8 +904,7 @@ static noinline void spusched_tick(struct spu_context *ctx)
struct spu_context *new = NULL;
struct spu *spu = NULL;

- if (spu_acquire(ctx))
- BUG(); /* a kernel thread never has signals pending */
+ BUG_ON(spu_acquire(ctx)); /* a kernel thread never has signals pending */

if (ctx->state != SPU_STATE_RUNNABLE)
goto out;
--
1.8.3.1


2021-03-17 07:02:39

by Christophe Leroy

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: replace if (cond) BUG() with BUG_ON()



Le 17/03/2021 à 07:45, Jiapeng Chong a écrit :
> Fix the following coccicheck warnings:
>
> ./arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c:908:2-5: WARNING: Use BUG_ON
> instead of if condition followed by BUG.

Consider using WARN_ON() instead of BUG_ON() if relevant. If not, explain in the commit message why
we need to keep a BUG_ON().

See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#bug-and-bug-on


>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
> index 3692064..139a6ec 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/cell/spufs/sched.c
> @@ -904,8 +904,7 @@ static noinline void spusched_tick(struct spu_context *ctx)
> struct spu_context *new = NULL;
> struct spu *spu = NULL;
>
> - if (spu_acquire(ctx))
> - BUG(); /* a kernel thread never has signals pending */
> + BUG_ON(spu_acquire(ctx)); /* a kernel thread never has signals pending */
>
> if (ctx->state != SPU_STATE_RUNNABLE)
> goto out;
>