These patches fixup or update for rockchip spdif.
Sugar Zhang (4):
ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Mark SPDIF_SMPDR as volatile
ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Fix some coding style
ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Add support for rk3568 spdif
ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: Add compatible for rk3568 spdif
.../devicetree/bindings/sound/rockchip-spdif.yaml | 1 +
sound/soc/rockchip/rockchip_spdif.c | 38 ++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--
2.7.4
On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 18:15:58 +0800, Sugar Zhang wrote:
> These patches fixup or update for rockchip spdif.
>
>
> Sugar Zhang (4):
> ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Mark SPDIF_SMPDR as volatile
> ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Fix some coding style
> ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Add support for rk3568 spdif
> ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: Add compatible for rk3568 spdif
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/4] ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Mark SPDIF_SMPDR as volatile
commit: 023a3f3a1c4f9be9cc1ae92579ba816120fb5807
[2/4] ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Fix some coding style
commit: acc8b9d117912c2d5952868fba0d4fca49cde3c8
[3/4] ASoC: rockchip: spdif: Add support for rk3568 spdif
commit: c5d4f09feb9f74e704d87a304f0c20001488fe10
[4/4] ASoC: dt-bindings: rockchip: Add compatible for rk3568 spdif
commit: e79ef3c2cfe0b39878496eac87450698a2e84e3f
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark