In the case like dmaengine which's not a dai but as a component, the
num_dai is zero, dmaengine component has the same component_of_node
as cpu dai, when cpu dai component is not ready, but dmaengine component
is ready, try to get cpu dai name, the snd_soc_get_dai_name() return
-EINVAL, not -EPROBE_DEFER, that cause below error:
asoc-simple-card <card name>: parse error -22
asoc-simple-card: probe of <card name> failed with error -22
The sound card failed to probe.
So this patch fixes the issue above by skipping the zero num_dai
component in searching dai name.
Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <[email protected]>
---
sound/soc/soc-core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-core.c b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
index 434e61b46983..a088bc9f7dd7 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-core.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-core.c
@@ -3233,7 +3233,7 @@ int snd_soc_get_dai_name(const struct of_phandle_args *args,
for_each_component(pos) {
struct device_node *component_of_node = soc_component_to_node(pos);
- if (component_of_node != args->np)
+ if (component_of_node != args->np || !pos->num_dai)
continue;
ret = snd_soc_component_of_xlate_dai_name(pos, args, dai_name);
--
2.17.1
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 19:19:12 +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> In the case like dmaengine which's not a dai but as a component, the
> num_dai is zero, dmaengine component has the same component_of_node
> as cpu dai, when cpu dai component is not ready, but dmaengine component
> is ready, try to get cpu dai name, the snd_soc_get_dai_name() return
> -EINVAL, not -EPROBE_DEFER, that cause below error:
>
> asoc-simple-card <card name>: parse error -22
> asoc-simple-card: probe of <card name> failed with error -22
>
> [...]
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: soc-core: skip zero num_dai component in searching dai name
commit: f7d344a2bd5ec81fbd1ce76928fd059e57ec9bea
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark