2022-05-14 02:13:10

by Siddh Raman Pant

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] spi: Doc fix - Describe add_lock and dma_map_dev in spi_controller

This fixes the corresponding warnings during building the docs.

Signed-off-by: Siddh Raman Pant <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/spi/spi.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/spi/spi.h b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
index f0177f9b6..d361ba262 100644
--- a/include/linux/spi/spi.h
+++ b/include/linux/spi/spi.h
@@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ extern struct spi_device *spi_new_ancillary_device(struct spi_device *spi, u8 ch
* @max_message_size: function that returns the max message size for
* a &spi_device; may be %NULL, so the default %SIZE_MAX will be used.
* @io_mutex: mutex for physical bus access
+ * @add_lock: mutex to avoid adding devices to the same chipselect
* @bus_lock_spinlock: spinlock for SPI bus locking
* @bus_lock_mutex: mutex for exclusion of multiple callers
* @bus_lock_flag: indicates that the SPI bus is locked for exclusive use
@@ -363,6 +364,7 @@ extern struct spi_device *spi_new_ancillary_device(struct spi_device *spi, u8 ch
* @transfer: adds a message to the controller's transfer queue.
* @cleanup: frees controller-specific state
* @can_dma: determine whether this controller supports DMA
+ * @dma_map_dev: device which can be used for DMA mapping
* @queued: whether this controller is providing an internal message queue
* @kworker: pointer to thread struct for message pump
* @pump_messages: work struct for scheduling work to the message pump
--
2.35.1


2022-05-14 03:47:43

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: Doc fix - Describe add_lock and dma_map_dev in spi_controller

On Thu, 12 May 2022 20:06:45 +0530, Siddh Raman Pant wrote:
> This fixes the corresponding warnings during building the docs.
>
>

Applied to

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: Doc fix - Describe add_lock and dma_map_dev in spi_controller
commit: 75d6fe48a21a0ea1565228c12b9c16f3fb37b673

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark