From: Vegard Nossum <[email protected]>
Replaces typedefs with struct-constructs for large parts of the IDE API
and drivers. No semantic changes. Rationale: CodingStyle, chapter 5.
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <[email protected]>
---
Applies to Linus's 2.6 tree.
I figured that this kind of easy/routine job would make for a gentle
introduction to kernel programming. However, what is the general opinion
of this kind of work, should it be done or not? (I realize that I may be
challenging some established habits with these changes.)
Also, what are the rules for enum and function-pointer typedefs?
CodingStyle does not discuss these cases.
Complete patch is 376K and follows as a link. This violates point 6 of
SubmittingPatches (no links), but is justified by point 7 (e-mail size).
http://peltkore.net/~vegard/linux-2.6-ide-typedef-vegard.patch
Regards from Vegard's