From: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
**NOT FOR CONSIDERATION**
I figured, sure why not add the strings for version number validation,
just in case we need them in the future. The commented out string is
considered by dt-schema to be "not a regex", but regex101 thinks it
is... Maybe dt-schema does not support named match groups, but they
are the only way that I could trivially find to make this somewhat
manageable. Either way, it is permissive so it allows combinations
of "M", "MpM" & no number.
Not-signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
index 90a7cabf58fe..6c725d067846 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml
@@ -80,7 +80,11 @@ properties:
insensitive, letters in the riscv,isa string must be all
lowercase to simplify parsing.
$ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/string"
- pattern: ^rv(?:64|32)imaf?d?q?c?b?v?k?h?(?:_[hsxz](?:[a-z])+)*$
+ oneOf:
+ - pattern: ^rv(?:64|32)imaf?d?q?c?b?v?k?h?(?:_[hsxz](?:[a-z])+)*$
+ - pattern: ^rv(?:64|32)(?:i\d+)(?:m\d+)(?:a\d+)(?:f\d+)?(?:d\d+)?(?:q\d+)?(?:c\d+)?(?:b\d+)?(?:v\d+)?(?:k\d+)?(?:h\d+)?(?:(?:_[zsh][imafdqcbvksh]|_x)(?:[a-z])+\d+)*$
+ - pattern: ^rv(?:64|32)(?:i\d+p\d+)(?:m\d+p\d+)(?:a\d+p\d+)(?:f\d+p\d+)?(?:d\d+p\d+)?(?:q\d+p\d+)?(?:c\d+p\d+)?(?:b\d+p\d+)?(?:v\d+p\d+)?(?:k\d+p\d+)?(?:h\d+p\d+)?(?:(?:_[zsh][imafdqcbvksh]|_x)(?:[a-z])+(?:\d+p\d+))*$
+# - pattern: ^rv(?:64|32)(?:i(?<num>(?:\d+|\d+p\d+)?)?)(?:m(?:\k<num>)?)(?:a(?:\k<num>)?)(?:f(?:\k<num>)?)?(?:d(?:\k<num>)?)?(?:q(?:\k<num>)?)?(?:c(?:\k<num>)?)?(?:b(?:\k<num>)?)?(?:v(?:\k<num>)?)?(?:k(?:\k<num>)?)?(?:h(?:\k<num>)?)?(?:(?:_[zsh][imafdqcbvksh]|_x)(?:[a-z])*(?:\d+|\d+p\d+)?)+$
# RISC-V requires 'timebase-frequency' in /cpus, so disallow it here
timebase-frequency: false
--
2.37.1
On Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:33:20 +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
>
> **NOT FOR CONSIDERATION**
>
> I figured, sure why not add the strings for version number validation,
> just in case we need them in the future. The commented out string is
> considered by dt-schema to be "not a regex", but regex101 thinks it
> is... Maybe dt-schema does not support named match groups, but they
> are the only way that I could trivially find to make this somewhat
> manageable. Either way, it is permissive so it allows combinations
> of "M", "MpM" & no number.
>
> Not-signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
yamllint warnings/errors:
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/cpus.yaml:87:111: [warning] line too long (297 > 110 characters) (line-length)
dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/
This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch
series is generally the most recent rc1.
If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above
error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to
date:
pip3 install dtschema --upgrade
Please check and re-submit.