2023-03-07 15:18:58

by Nathan Chancellor

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Increase size of BTF_ID_LIST without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF again

After commit 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and
bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr"), clang builds without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
warn:

kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10298:24: warning: array index 16 is past the end of the array (that has type 'u32[16]' (aka 'unsigned int[16]')) [-Warray-bounds]
meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr]) {
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9150:1: note: array 'special_kfunc_list' declared here
BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
^
include/linux/btf_ids.h:207:27: note: expanded from macro 'BTF_ID_LIST'
#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16];
^
1 warning generated.

A warning of this nature was previously addressed by
commit beb3d47d1d3d ("bpf: Fix a BTF_ID_LIST bug with
CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF not set") but there have been new kfuncs added
since then.

Quadruple the size of the CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=n definition so that
this problem is unlikely to show up for some time.

Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1810
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
---
include/linux/btf_ids.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
index 3a4f7cd882ca..00950cc03bff 100644
--- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
+++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ extern struct btf_id_set8 name;

#else

-#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16];
+#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[64];
#define BTF_ID(prefix, name)
#define BTF_ID_FLAGS(prefix, name, ...)
#define BTF_ID_UNUSED

---
base-commit: 36e5e391a25af28dc1f4586f95d577b38ff4ed72
change-id: 20230307-bpf-kfuncs-warray-bounds-c2040e8ee7ee

Best regards,
--
Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>



2023-03-07 15:29:27

by Tom Rix

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Increase size of BTF_ID_LIST without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF again


On 3/7/23 7:14 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After commit 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and
> bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr"), clang builds without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
> warn:
>
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10298:24: warning: array index 16 is past the end of the array (that has type 'u32[16]' (aka 'unsigned int[16]')) [-Warray-bounds]
> meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr]) {
> ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9150:1: note: array 'special_kfunc_list' declared here
> BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
> ^
> include/linux/btf_ids.h:207:27: note: expanded from macro 'BTF_ID_LIST'
> #define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16];
> ^
> 1 warning generated.
>
> A warning of this nature was previously addressed by
> commit beb3d47d1d3d ("bpf: Fix a BTF_ID_LIST bug with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF not set") but there have been new kfuncs added
> since then.
>
> Quadruple the size of the CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=n definition so that
> this problem is unlikely to show up for some time.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1810
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>

This has a better commit message, let's use this one.

FWIW, gcc 13 -Warray-bounds, did not catch this.

Reviewed-by: Tom Rix <[email protected]>

> ---
> include/linux/btf_ids.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> index 3a4f7cd882ca..00950cc03bff 100644
> --- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> +++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ extern struct btf_id_set8 name;
>
> #else
>
> -#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16];
> +#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[64];
> #define BTF_ID(prefix, name)
> #define BTF_ID_FLAGS(prefix, name, ...)
> #define BTF_ID_UNUSED
>
> ---
> base-commit: 36e5e391a25af28dc1f4586f95d577b38ff4ed72
> change-id: 20230307-bpf-kfuncs-warray-bounds-c2040e8ee7ee
>
> Best regards,


2023-03-07 15:53:29

by Alexei Starovoitov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Increase size of BTF_ID_LIST without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF again

On Tue, Mar 7, 2023 at 7:14 AM Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> After commit 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and
> bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr"), clang builds without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF

please don't break commit subj into multiple lines.
I've fixed it manually this time while applying.

> warn:
>
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10298:24: warning: array index 16 is past the end of the array (that has type 'u32[16]' (aka 'unsigned int[16]')) [-Warray-bounds]
> meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr]) {
> ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9150:1: note: array 'special_kfunc_list' declared here
> BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
> ^
> include/linux/btf_ids.h:207:27: note: expanded from macro 'BTF_ID_LIST'
> #define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16];
> ^
> 1 warning generated.
>
> A warning of this nature was previously addressed by
> commit beb3d47d1d3d ("bpf: Fix a BTF_ID_LIST bug with
> CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF not set") but there have been new kfuncs added

and here.

> since then.
>
> Quadruple the size of the CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=n definition so that
> this problem is unlikely to show up for some time.
>
> Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1810
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/linux/btf_ids.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/btf_ids.h b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> index 3a4f7cd882ca..00950cc03bff 100644
> --- a/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> +++ b/include/linux/btf_ids.h
> @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ extern struct btf_id_set8 name;
>
> #else
>
> -#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16];
> +#define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[64];
> #define BTF_ID(prefix, name)
> #define BTF_ID_FLAGS(prefix, name, ...)
> #define BTF_ID_UNUSED
>
> ---
> base-commit: 36e5e391a25af28dc1f4586f95d577b38ff4ed72
> change-id: 20230307-bpf-kfuncs-warray-bounds-c2040e8ee7ee
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
>

2023-03-07 16:03:13

by patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: Increase size of BTF_ID_LIST without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF again

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>:

On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 08:14:06 -0700 you wrote:
> After commit 66e3a13e7c2c ("bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_slice and
> bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr"), clang builds without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF
> warn:
>
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10298:24: warning: array index 16 is past the end of the array (that has type 'u32[16]' (aka 'unsigned int[16]')) [-Warray-bounds]
> meta.func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr]) {
> ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c:9150:1: note: array 'special_kfunc_list' declared here
> BTF_ID_LIST(special_kfunc_list)
> ^
> include/linux/btf_ids.h:207:27: note: expanded from macro 'BTF_ID_LIST'
> #define BTF_ID_LIST(name) static u32 __maybe_unused name[16];
> ^
> 1 warning generated.
>
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] bpf: Increase size of BTF_ID_LIST without CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF again
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2d5bcdcda879

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html