Currently, CONFIG_PPC64_BIG_ENDIAN_ELF_ABI_V2 is not selectable with
ld.lld because of an explicit dependency on GNU ld, due to lack of
testing with LLVM.
Erhard was kind enough to test this option on his hardware with LLVM 15,
which ran without any issues. This should not be too surprising, as
ld.lld does not have support for the ELFv1 ABI, only ELFv2, so it should
have decent support. With this series, big endian kernels can be built
with LLVM=1.
This has seen our basic set of powerpc configurations with clang-15,
clang-16, and clang-17 but I will never be opposed to more testing :)
The first two patches fix a couple of issues I noticed while build
testing and the final patch actually allows the option to be selected.
---
Nathan Chancellor (3):
powerpc/boot: Only use '-mabi=elfv2' with CONFIG_PPC64_BOOT_WRAPPER
powerpc: Fix use of '-mabi=elfv2' with clang
powerpc: Allow CONFIG_PPC64_BIG_ENDIAN_ELF_ABI_V2 with ld.lld 15+
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 3 +--
arch/powerpc/Makefile | 4 +---
arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 5dc4c995db9eb45f6373a956eb1f69460e69e6d4
change-id: 20230118-ppc64-elfv2-llvm-39edac67bf0a
Best regards,
--
Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
Commit 5017b4594672 ("powerpc/64: Option to build big-endian with ELFv2
ABI") restricted the ELFv2 ABI configuration such that it can only be
selected when linking with ld.bfd, due to lack of testing with LLVM.
ld.lld can link ELFv2 kernels without any issues; in fact, it is the
only ABI that ld.lld supports, as ELFv1 is not supported in ld.lld.
As this has not seen a ton of real world testing yet, be conservative
and only allow this option to be selected with the latest stable release
of LLVM (15.x) and newer.
While in the area, remove 'default n', as it is unnecessary to specify
it explicitly since all boolean/tristate configuration symbols default
to n.
Tested-by: "Erhard F." <[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index b8c4ac56bddc..f9f13029c98a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -603,8 +603,7 @@ config PPC64_BIG_ENDIAN_ELF_ABI_V2
bool "Build big-endian kernel using ELF ABI V2 (EXPERIMENTAL)"
depends on PPC64 && CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
depends on CC_HAS_ELFV2
- depends on LD_IS_BFD && LD_VERSION >= 22400
- default n
+ depends on LD_VERSION >= 22400 || LLD_VERSION >= 150000
help
This builds the kernel image using the "Power Architecture 64-Bit ELF
V2 ABI Specification", which has a reduced stack overhead and faster
--
2.39.2
When CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2 is enabled with clang through
CONFIG_PPC64_BIG_ENDIAN_ELF_ABI_V2, building the powerpc boot wrapper
in 32-bit mode (i.e. with CONFIG_PPC64_BOOT_WRAPPER=n) fails with:
error: unknown target ABI 'elfv2'
The ABI cannot be changed with '-m32'; GCC silently accepts it but clang
errors out. Only provide '-mabi=elfv2' when CONFIG_PPC64_BOOT_WRAPPER is
enabled, which is the only way '-mabi=elfv2' will be useful.
Tested-by: "Erhard F." <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
index d32d95aea5d6..0d4a8e8bdcab 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile
@@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ BOOTCFLAGS += -m64 -mcpu=powerpc64le
else
BOOTCFLAGS += -m64 -mcpu=powerpc64
endif
+ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2
+BOOTCFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mabi=elfv2)
+endif
else
BOOTCFLAGS += -m32 -mcpu=powerpc
endif
@@ -55,9 +58,6 @@ BOOTCFLAGS += -mbig-endian
else
BOOTCFLAGS += -mlittle-endian
endif
-ifdef CONFIG_PPC64_ELF_ABI_V2
-BOOTCFLAGS += $(call cc-option,-mabi=elfv2)
-endif
BOOTAFLAGS := -D__ASSEMBLY__ $(BOOTCFLAGS) -nostdinc
--
2.39.2
Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> writes:
> Currently, CONFIG_PPC64_BIG_ENDIAN_ELF_ABI_V2 is not selectable with
> ld.lld because of an explicit dependency on GNU ld, due to lack of
> testing with LLVM.
>
> Erhard was kind enough to test this option on his hardware with LLVM 15,
> which ran without any issues. This should not be too surprising, as
> ld.lld does not have support for the ELFv1 ABI, only ELFv2, so it should
> have decent support. With this series, big endian kernels can be built
> with LLVM=1.
>
> This has seen our basic set of powerpc configurations with clang-15,
> clang-16, and clang-17 but I will never be opposed to more testing :)
>
> The first two patches fix a couple of issues I noticed while build
> testing and the final patch actually allows the option to be selected.
Thanks for this.
I thought about applying this last week but decided not to. I'll plan to
pick it up for 6.4.
cheers
On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 05:11:54PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]> writes:
> > Currently, CONFIG_PPC64_BIG_ENDIAN_ELF_ABI_V2 is not selectable with
> > ld.lld because of an explicit dependency on GNU ld, due to lack of
> > testing with LLVM.
> >
> > Erhard was kind enough to test this option on his hardware with LLVM 15,
> > which ran without any issues. This should not be too surprising, as
> > ld.lld does not have support for the ELFv1 ABI, only ELFv2, so it should
> > have decent support. With this series, big endian kernels can be built
> > with LLVM=1.
> >
> > This has seen our basic set of powerpc configurations with clang-15,
> > clang-16, and clang-17 but I will never be opposed to more testing :)
> >
> > The first two patches fix a couple of issues I noticed while build
> > testing and the final patch actually allows the option to be selected.
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> I thought about applying this last week but decided not to. I'll plan to
> pick it up for 6.4.
No worries, I sent this much later in the development cycle than I had
initially intended, so I figured that 6.3 was a long shot anyways. Plus
more soak time is never a bad thing :)
Thanks for taking the initial look, cheers!
Nathan
On Wed, 15 Feb 2023 11:41:14 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Currently, CONFIG_PPC64_BIG_ENDIAN_ELF_ABI_V2 is not selectable with
> ld.lld because of an explicit dependency on GNU ld, due to lack of
> testing with LLVM.
>
> Erhard was kind enough to test this option on his hardware with LLVM 15,
> which ran without any issues. This should not be too surprising, as
> ld.lld does not have support for the ELFv1 ABI, only ELFv2, so it should
> have decent support. With this series, big endian kernels can be built
> with LLVM=1.
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/3] powerpc/boot: Only use '-mabi=elfv2' with CONFIG_PPC64_BOOT_WRAPPER
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/d1c5accacb234c3a9f1609a73b4b2eaa4ef07d1a
[2/3] powerpc: Fix use of '-mabi=elfv2' with clang
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/7c3bd8362b06cff0a4044a4975adb7d71db2dfba
[3/3] powerpc: Allow CONFIG_PPC64_BIG_ENDIAN_ELF_ABI_V2 with ld.lld 15+
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/a11334d8327b3fd7987cbfb38e956a44c722d88f
cheers