2023-05-18 08:30:20

by Christophe JAILLET

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] perf: qcom_l2_pmu: Make l2_cache_pmu_probe_cluster() more robust

If an error occurs after calling list_add(), the &l2cache_pmu->clusters
list will reference some memory that will be freed when the managed
resources will be released.

Move the list_add() at the end of the function when everything is in fine.

This is harmless because if l2_cache_pmu_probe_cluster() fails, then
l2_cache_pmu_probe() will fail as well and 'l2cache_pmu' will be released
as well.
But it looks cleaner and could silence static checker warning.

Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>
---
This is not a fix, because there is no issue.
But in case of interest:
Fixes: 21bdbb7102ed ("perf: add qcom l2 cache perf events driver")
---
drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
index aaca6db7d8f6..3f9a98c17a89 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/qcom_l2_pmu.c
@@ -857,7 +857,6 @@ static int l2_cache_pmu_probe_cluster(struct device *dev, void *data)
return -ENOMEM;

INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cluster->next);
- list_add(&cluster->next, &l2cache_pmu->clusters);
cluster->cluster_id = fw_cluster_id;

irq = platform_get_irq(sdev, 0);
@@ -883,6 +882,7 @@ static int l2_cache_pmu_probe_cluster(struct device *dev, void *data)

spin_lock_init(&cluster->pmu_lock);

+ list_add(&cluster->next, &l2cache_pmu->clusters);
l2cache_pmu->num_pmus++;

return 0;
--
2.34.1



2023-05-19 05:17:46

by Dan Carpenter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: qcom_l2_pmu: Make l2_cache_pmu_probe_cluster() more robust

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:18:08AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> But it looks cleaner and could silence static checker warning.

Thanks Christophe,

Of course, you found found this with your Coccinelle script so
technically it already silences a static checker warning... But I
ran into two list related use after frees yesterday so I'm definitely
going to create a Smatch warning which will trigger here as well.

I'm NOT going to add a if (if_list_is_devm()) exception because I feel
like that encourages subtle code and because devm_ lifetimes are
complicated.

regards,
dan carpenter


2023-06-05 17:28:38

by Will Deacon

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: qcom_l2_pmu: Make l2_cache_pmu_probe_cluster() more robust

On Thu, 18 May 2023 10:18:08 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> If an error occurs after calling list_add(), the &l2cache_pmu->clusters
> list will reference some memory that will be freed when the managed
> resources will be released.
>
> Move the list_add() at the end of the function when everything is in fine.
>
> This is harmless because if l2_cache_pmu_probe_cluster() fails, then
> l2_cache_pmu_probe() will fail as well and 'l2cache_pmu' will be released
> as well.
> But it looks cleaner and could silence static checker warning.
>
> [...]

Applied to will (for-next/perf), thanks!

[1/1] perf: qcom_l2_pmu: Make l2_cache_pmu_probe_cluster() more robust
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/7bd42f122c7c

Cheers,
--
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev